Clinical and technical factors in endoscopic skull base surgery associated with reconstructive success.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin23.267
A Abiri, B F Bitner, T V Nguyen, J C Pang, K M Roman, M Vasudev, D D Chung, S H Tripathi, J C Harris, N Kosaraju, R M Shih, M Ko, J E Miller, J E Douglas, D J Lee, J G Eide, R S Kshirsagar, K M Phillips, A R Sedaghat, M Bergsneider, M B Wang, J N Palmer, N D Adappa, F P K Hsu, E C Kuan
{"title":"Clinical and technical factors in endoscopic skull base surgery associated with reconstructive success.","authors":"A Abiri, B F Bitner, T V Nguyen, J C Pang, K M Roman, M Vasudev, D D Chung, S H Tripathi, J C Harris, N Kosaraju, R M Shih, M Ko, J E Miller, J E Douglas, D J Lee, J G Eide, R S Kshirsagar, K M Phillips, A R Sedaghat, M Bergsneider, M B Wang, J N Palmer, N D Adappa, F P K Hsu, E C Kuan","doi":"10.4193/Rhin23.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we identified key discrete clinical and technical factors that may correlate with primary reconstructive success in endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ESBS cases with intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks at four tertiary academic rhinology programs were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression identified factors associated with surgical outcomes by defect subsite (anterior cranial fossa [ACF], suprasellar [SS], purely sellar, posterior cranial fossa [PCF]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 706 patients (50.4% female), 61.9% had pituitary adenomas, 73.4% had sellar or SS defects, and 20.5% had high-flow intraoperative CSF leaks. The postoperative CSF leak rate was 7.8%. Larger defect size predicted ACF postoperative leaks; use of rigid reconstruction and older age protected against sellar postoperative leaks; and use of dural sealants compared to fibrin glue protected against PCF postoperative leaks. SS postoperative leaks occurred less frequently with the use of dural onlay. Body-mass index, intraoperative CSF leak flow rate, and the use of lumbar drain were not significantly associated with postoperative CSF leak. Meningitis was associated with larger tumors in ACF defects, nondissolvable nasal packing in SS defects, and high-flow intraoperative leaks in PCF defects. Sinus infections were more common in sellar defects with synthetic grafts and nondissolvable nasal packing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depending on defect subsite, reconstructive success following ESBS may be influenced by factors, such as age, defect size, and the use of rigid reconstruction, dural onlay, and tissue sealants.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"330-341"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this study, we identified key discrete clinical and technical factors that may correlate with primary reconstructive success in endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS).

Methods: ESBS cases with intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks at four tertiary academic rhinology programs were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression identified factors associated with surgical outcomes by defect subsite (anterior cranial fossa [ACF], suprasellar [SS], purely sellar, posterior cranial fossa [PCF]).

Results: Of 706 patients (50.4% female), 61.9% had pituitary adenomas, 73.4% had sellar or SS defects, and 20.5% had high-flow intraoperative CSF leaks. The postoperative CSF leak rate was 7.8%. Larger defect size predicted ACF postoperative leaks; use of rigid reconstruction and older age protected against sellar postoperative leaks; and use of dural sealants compared to fibrin glue protected against PCF postoperative leaks. SS postoperative leaks occurred less frequently with the use of dural onlay. Body-mass index, intraoperative CSF leak flow rate, and the use of lumbar drain were not significantly associated with postoperative CSF leak. Meningitis was associated with larger tumors in ACF defects, nondissolvable nasal packing in SS defects, and high-flow intraoperative leaks in PCF defects. Sinus infections were more common in sellar defects with synthetic grafts and nondissolvable nasal packing.

Conclusions: Depending on defect subsite, reconstructive success following ESBS may be influenced by factors, such as age, defect size, and the use of rigid reconstruction, dural onlay, and tissue sealants.

内窥镜颅底手术中与重建成功相关的临床和技术因素。
背景:在这项研究中,我们确定了可能与内窥镜颅底手术(ESBS)初次重建成功相关的关键临床和技术因素:在这项研究中,我们确定了可能与内窥镜颅底手术(ESBS)一次重建成功率相关的关键临床和技术因素:方法:我们对四个三级学术鼻科项目中出现术中脑脊液(CSF)漏的 ESBS 病例进行了回顾性研究。结果:在 706 例患者(50.4%)中,有 1 例患者的脑脊液(CSF)漏在术中发生,有 1 例患者的脑脊液(CSF)漏在术中发生,有 1 例患者的脑脊液(CSF)漏在术中发生:在706名患者(50.4%为女性)中,61.9%患有垂体腺瘤,73.4%患有蝶鞍或SS缺损,20.5%患有高流量术中CSF漏。术后 CSF 泄漏率为 7.8%。缺损面积越大,ACF术后渗漏的发生率越高;使用硬膜重建和年龄越大,蝶鞍术后渗漏的发生率越低;使用硬膜密封剂比使用纤维蛋白胶更能防止PCF术后渗漏。使用硬脑膜衬垫时,SS 术后渗漏发生率较低。体重指数、术中 CSF 漏流量和腰椎引流管的使用与术后 CSF 漏无明显关系。脑膜炎与 ACF 缺损中较大的肿瘤、SS 缺损中不可溶解的鼻腔填料以及 PCF 缺损中高流量的术中渗漏有关。鼻窦感染在使用合成移植物和非可溶解鼻腔填料的蝶窦缺损中更为常见:根据缺损部位的不同,ESBS术后的重建成功率可能会受到一些因素的影响,如年龄、缺损大小以及刚性重建、硬膜镶嵌和组织密封剂的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信