Study delay during emergency remote teaching among students at Dutch universities: the role of students’ education satisfaction and academic wellbeing

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Manja Vollmann, Renée A. Scheepers, Femke Hilverda
{"title":"Study delay during emergency remote teaching among students at Dutch universities: the role of students’ education satisfaction and academic wellbeing","authors":"Manja Vollmann, Renée A. Scheepers, Femke Hilverda","doi":"10.1007/s10212-023-00779-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated whether the amount of emergency remote teaching (ERT) was negatively associated with students’ academic performance in terms of study delay and explored whether this association was mediated by study-related experiences, i.e. students’ education satisfaction and subsequently academic wellbeing (academic burnout and academic engagement). The study was conducted during the academic year 2020/2021 and 680 students from all conventional Dutch universities participated. The amount of ERT and study-related experiences were measured at three time points throughout the academic year and the respective scores were averaged for data analysis. Study delay was assessed at the end of the academic year (last time point). The hypothesised model was tested using path analysis. A higher amount of ERT was associated with a higher risk of study delay and this association was mediated by study-related experiences in two ways. First, a higher amount of ERT was related to lower education satisfaction, which in turn increased the risk of study delay. Second, a higher amount of ERT was related to lower education satisfaction, which in turn was associated with lower academic wellbeing, i.e. more academic burnout and less academic engagement, which in turn increased the risk of study delay. The findings suggest that education satisfaction and academic wellbeing are mechanisms underlying the detrimental effect of ERT on study performance, with education satisfaction playing a central role. To avoid students incurring study delay, universities are advised to implement ERT and online education in general in such a way that students’ education satisfaction gets preserved.</p>","PeriodicalId":47800,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychology of Education","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00779-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated whether the amount of emergency remote teaching (ERT) was negatively associated with students’ academic performance in terms of study delay and explored whether this association was mediated by study-related experiences, i.e. students’ education satisfaction and subsequently academic wellbeing (academic burnout and academic engagement). The study was conducted during the academic year 2020/2021 and 680 students from all conventional Dutch universities participated. The amount of ERT and study-related experiences were measured at three time points throughout the academic year and the respective scores were averaged for data analysis. Study delay was assessed at the end of the academic year (last time point). The hypothesised model was tested using path analysis. A higher amount of ERT was associated with a higher risk of study delay and this association was mediated by study-related experiences in two ways. First, a higher amount of ERT was related to lower education satisfaction, which in turn increased the risk of study delay. Second, a higher amount of ERT was related to lower education satisfaction, which in turn was associated with lower academic wellbeing, i.e. more academic burnout and less academic engagement, which in turn increased the risk of study delay. The findings suggest that education satisfaction and academic wellbeing are mechanisms underlying the detrimental effect of ERT on study performance, with education satisfaction playing a central role. To avoid students incurring study delay, universities are advised to implement ERT and online education in general in such a way that students’ education satisfaction gets preserved.

Abstract Image

荷兰大学学生在紧急远程教学期间的学习延迟:学生的教育满意度和学习幸福感的作用
本研究调查了紧急远程教学(ERT)的数量是否与学生在学习延迟方面的学业成绩呈负相关,并探讨了这种关联是否受学习相关体验(即学生的教育满意度以及随后的学业幸福感(学业倦怠和学业投入))的调节。研究在 2020/2021 学年进行,来自荷兰所有传统大学的 680 名学生参与了研究。在整个学年的三个时间点测量了 ERT 的数量和与学习相关的经历,并在数据分析中对各自的得分进行了平均。学习延迟在学年结束时(最后一个时间点)进行评估。假设模型通过路径分析进行了检验。较高的 ERT 量与较高的学习延迟风险相关,而这种关联通过两种方式被学习相关经历所调节。首先,较高的 ERT 量与较低的教育满意度有关,而教育满意度又会增加学习延迟的风险。其次,较高的 ERT 与较低的教育满意度有关,而教育满意度又与较低的学业幸福感有关,即较高的学业倦怠感和较低的学业参与度,这反过来又增加了学习延迟的风险。研究结果表明,教育满意度和学习幸福感是 ERT 对学习成绩产生不利影响的内在机制,其中教育满意度起着核心作用。为避免学生出现学习拖延,建议大学在实施 ERT 和在线教育时,要注意保持学生的教育满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychology of Education (EJPE) is a quarterly journal oriented toward publishing high-quality papers that address the relevant psychological aspects of educational processes embedded in different institutional, social, and cultural contexts, and which focus on diversity in terms of the participants, their educational trajectories and their socio-cultural contexts. Authors are strongly encouraged to employ a variety of theoretical and methodological tools developed in the psychology of education in order to gain new insights by integrating different perspectives. Instead of reinforcing the divisions and distances between different communities stemming from their theoretical and methodological backgrounds, we would like to invite authors to engage with diverse theoretical and methodological tools in a meaningful way and to search for the new knowledge that can emerge from a combination of these tools. EJPE is open to all papers reflecting findings from original psychological studies on educational processes, as well as to exceptional theoretical and review papers that integrate current knowledge and chart new avenues for future research. Following the assumption that engaging with diversities creates great opportunities for new knowledge, the editorial team wishes to encourage, in particular, authors from less represented countries and regions, as well as young researchers, to submit their work and to keep going through the review process, which can be challenging, but which also presents opportunities for learning and inspiration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信