Does teachers’ motivation have an impact on students’ scientific literacy and motivation? An empirical study in Colombia with data from PISA 2015

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ana María Suárez-Mesa, Ricardo L. Gómez
{"title":"Does teachers’ motivation have an impact on students’ scientific literacy and motivation? An empirical study in Colombia with data from PISA 2015","authors":"Ana María Suárez-Mesa, Ricardo L. Gómez","doi":"10.1186/s40536-023-00190-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study we use data from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) to investigate the effect of teachers’ motivation on students’ scientific literacy and motivation in Colombia. These relationships are explored using a multilevel modeling framework and through the lens of Self-Determination Theory. Although difficulties in achieving education quality in developing and emerging economies are commonly attributed to teacher motivation issues, and important policy measures are implemented based on this assumption, this topic remains largely empirically unexplored. The purpose of the study is to contribute to fill this gap and provide empirically based insights for a broader and more informed dialogue regarding the effect of motivation in the development of scientific literacy, and to the design and implementation of evidence-based policies, instructional practices, and interventions. In this analysis, we did not find a significant relationship between teacher motivation and either students’ scientific literacy or motivation. However, students’ interest in science and sense of self-efficacy were significantly associated with their own achievement. The results also show that teacher-directed instruction is the strongest predictor of scientific literacy as opposed to inquiry-based teaching. However, inquiry-based teaching was found to be a positive predictor of increased students’ motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":37009,"journal":{"name":"Large-Scale Assessments in Education","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Large-Scale Assessments in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00190-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study we use data from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) to investigate the effect of teachers’ motivation on students’ scientific literacy and motivation in Colombia. These relationships are explored using a multilevel modeling framework and through the lens of Self-Determination Theory. Although difficulties in achieving education quality in developing and emerging economies are commonly attributed to teacher motivation issues, and important policy measures are implemented based on this assumption, this topic remains largely empirically unexplored. The purpose of the study is to contribute to fill this gap and provide empirically based insights for a broader and more informed dialogue regarding the effect of motivation in the development of scientific literacy, and to the design and implementation of evidence-based policies, instructional practices, and interventions. In this analysis, we did not find a significant relationship between teacher motivation and either students’ scientific literacy or motivation. However, students’ interest in science and sense of self-efficacy were significantly associated with their own achievement. The results also show that teacher-directed instruction is the strongest predictor of scientific literacy as opposed to inquiry-based teaching. However, inquiry-based teaching was found to be a positive predictor of increased students’ motivation.

Abstract Image

教师的积极性对学生的科学素养和积极性有影响吗?利用 2015 年国际学生评估项目(PISA)数据在哥伦比亚开展的实证研究
在本研究中,我们利用国际学生评估项目(PISA)的数据来研究哥伦比亚教师的积极性对学生科学素养和积极性的影响。我们采用多层次建模框架,从自我决定理论的角度探讨了这些关系。尽管发展中国家和新兴经济体在提高教育质量方面遇到的困难通常被归咎于教师的积极性问题,并基于这一假设实施了重要的政策措施,但这一主题在很大程度上仍未得到实证研究。本研究旨在填补这一空白,并提供基于经验的见解,以便就科学素养培养中动机的影响开展更广泛、更知情的对话,并设计和实施基于证据的政策、教学实践和干预措施。在这项分析中,我们没有发现教师的积极性与学生的科学素养或积极性之间有显著的关系。然而,学生对科学的兴趣和自我效能感却与他们的成绩有显著的关系。结果还显示,与探究式教学相比,教师指导式教学对科学素养的预测作用最强。不过,探究式教学对学生学习动机的提高有积极的预测作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Large-Scale Assessments in Education
Large-Scale Assessments in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信