Philosophy and Religion in Plato's Dialogues by Andrea Nightingale (review)

IF 0.7 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Marina Berzins McCoy
{"title":"Philosophy and Religion in Plato's Dialogues by Andrea Nightingale (review)","authors":"Marina Berzins McCoy","doi":"10.1353/hph.2024.a916715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Philosophy and Religion in Plato's Dialogues</em> by Andrea Nightingale <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Marina Berzins McCoy </li> </ul> Andrea Nightingale. <em>Philosophy and Religion in Plato's Dialogues</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. 308. Hardback, $39.99. <p>Andrea Nightingale has written a scholarly work that will prove indispensable to restoring the centrality of religion and theology to Platonic philosophy. She demonstrates that Plato uses the language of Greek religion to inform his metaphysics and his very conception of philosophy. She deftly interweaves classical scholarship with close readings of a wide range of texts in order to build her claims. She gives especially good treatments of Eleusinian mysteries and Orphic ritual. She also explores the way in which the epiphanic nature of the encounter with the Forms has a transforming influence on the philosopher's soul.</p> <p>In the introduction, Nightingale presents an overview of key \"divinity markers\" (8–23) present in the dialogues—occurrences in which the Forms are described as godlike, references to Eleusinian and Orphic mysteries, poetic narratives of epiphanic encounters, and references to the sacred spectacle. She also assesses why these references are so often overlooked in contemporary scholarship, noting many contemporary scholars' unfamiliarity with the specific nature of Greek religion, and a general movement toward secularism in philosophy. She acknowledges some notable exceptions (e.g. Mark McPherran's work), but she might have given attention to others as well. Specifically, Jill Gordon's <em>Plato's Erotic World: From Cosmic Origins to Human Death</em> (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) characterizes Platonic philosophy in terms of both striving for and alienation from the divine, and Ross Romero's <em>Without the Least Tremor: The Sacrifice of Socrates in Plato's</em> Phaedo (Albany: SUNY Press, 2009) on religious sacrifice in the <em>Phaedo</em> is another example. Still, Nightingale is accurate in her assessment of the field's tendency to ignore religious language or to assimilate it too quickly to later monotheistic traditions. Her book convincingly argues that religious language can serve a philosophical purpose in suggesting how union with Beauty and the Good is experienced. The book as a whole provides precious information about many connections between Greek religion and culture that add depth and richness to particular Platonic passages.</p> <p>Chapter 1 sketches out a theory of the Forms and argues that as a group they are treated as \"divine.\" The <em>Phaedo</em> connects the Forms to concepts of eternality, unchangingness, and intelligibility (50). Human beings can connect with the Forms through contemplation (51). Similarly, the <em>Republic</em> describes the Forms as divine and the soul that contemplates them as undergoing a kind of divinization. The Form of the Good is the highest divinity, and its pursuit is an encounter with the divine. Nightingale notes that this does not mean that the Good can be grasped completely. But insofar as we can contemplate the Forms, Plato thinks that we can come to know the Good and become more like it.</p> <p>In chapter 2, Nightingale turns to the topic of human longing, focusing on the <em>Symposium</em>. We humans, Plato believes, have two different but related kinds of longing for immortality. While human beings long for a divine kind of immortality that is ultimately unreachable, they can have a partial kind of immortality through desiring the Good and giving birth to \"children\" of the soul. The vision of the Beautiful can be a kind of divine epiphany that leads to wonder. Nightingale delves more deeply into the concept of epiphany through texts such as the Homeric Hymn to Dionysius and Herodotus, as well as sanctuary inscriptions. Epiphanies validate the Greek religious system. Similarly, Plato's metaphysics is validated <strong>[End Page 149]</strong> by a philosophical vision of the Forms. Nightingale's detailed account of Eleusinian mysteries brings together a wide range of source material with which many philosophers will be unfamiliar, and which is especially valuable for scholars seeking to interpret Platonic passages that allude to the mysteries. Nightingale also offers an engaging interpretation of Alcibiades as one who has encountered the divine in Socrates yet failed to understand it, and so has \"profaned\" the mysteries in the context of human relationship (107–13).</p> <p>Chapter 3 examines Socrates's accounts of the soul and immortality in the <em>Phaedo</em>. Whereas those...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46448,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2024.a916715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Philosophy and Religion in Plato's Dialogues by Andrea Nightingale
  • Marina Berzins McCoy
Andrea Nightingale. Philosophy and Religion in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. 308. Hardback, $39.99.

Andrea Nightingale has written a scholarly work that will prove indispensable to restoring the centrality of religion and theology to Platonic philosophy. She demonstrates that Plato uses the language of Greek religion to inform his metaphysics and his very conception of philosophy. She deftly interweaves classical scholarship with close readings of a wide range of texts in order to build her claims. She gives especially good treatments of Eleusinian mysteries and Orphic ritual. She also explores the way in which the epiphanic nature of the encounter with the Forms has a transforming influence on the philosopher's soul.

In the introduction, Nightingale presents an overview of key "divinity markers" (8–23) present in the dialogues—occurrences in which the Forms are described as godlike, references to Eleusinian and Orphic mysteries, poetic narratives of epiphanic encounters, and references to the sacred spectacle. She also assesses why these references are so often overlooked in contemporary scholarship, noting many contemporary scholars' unfamiliarity with the specific nature of Greek religion, and a general movement toward secularism in philosophy. She acknowledges some notable exceptions (e.g. Mark McPherran's work), but she might have given attention to others as well. Specifically, Jill Gordon's Plato's Erotic World: From Cosmic Origins to Human Death (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) characterizes Platonic philosophy in terms of both striving for and alienation from the divine, and Ross Romero's Without the Least Tremor: The Sacrifice of Socrates in Plato's Phaedo (Albany: SUNY Press, 2009) on religious sacrifice in the Phaedo is another example. Still, Nightingale is accurate in her assessment of the field's tendency to ignore religious language or to assimilate it too quickly to later monotheistic traditions. Her book convincingly argues that religious language can serve a philosophical purpose in suggesting how union with Beauty and the Good is experienced. The book as a whole provides precious information about many connections between Greek religion and culture that add depth and richness to particular Platonic passages.

Chapter 1 sketches out a theory of the Forms and argues that as a group they are treated as "divine." The Phaedo connects the Forms to concepts of eternality, unchangingness, and intelligibility (50). Human beings can connect with the Forms through contemplation (51). Similarly, the Republic describes the Forms as divine and the soul that contemplates them as undergoing a kind of divinization. The Form of the Good is the highest divinity, and its pursuit is an encounter with the divine. Nightingale notes that this does not mean that the Good can be grasped completely. But insofar as we can contemplate the Forms, Plato thinks that we can come to know the Good and become more like it.

In chapter 2, Nightingale turns to the topic of human longing, focusing on the Symposium. We humans, Plato believes, have two different but related kinds of longing for immortality. While human beings long for a divine kind of immortality that is ultimately unreachable, they can have a partial kind of immortality through desiring the Good and giving birth to "children" of the soul. The vision of the Beautiful can be a kind of divine epiphany that leads to wonder. Nightingale delves more deeply into the concept of epiphany through texts such as the Homeric Hymn to Dionysius and Herodotus, as well as sanctuary inscriptions. Epiphanies validate the Greek religious system. Similarly, Plato's metaphysics is validated [End Page 149] by a philosophical vision of the Forms. Nightingale's detailed account of Eleusinian mysteries brings together a wide range of source material with which many philosophers will be unfamiliar, and which is especially valuable for scholars seeking to interpret Platonic passages that allude to the mysteries. Nightingale also offers an engaging interpretation of Alcibiades as one who has encountered the divine in Socrates yet failed to understand it, and so has "profaned" the mysteries in the context of human relationship (107–13).

Chapter 3 examines Socrates's accounts of the soul and immortality in the Phaedo. Whereas those...

柏拉图对话录中的哲学与宗教》,作者 Andrea Nightingale(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 柏拉图对话录中的哲学与宗教》,作者 Andrea Nightingale Marina Berzins McCoy Andrea Nightingale。柏拉图对话录中的哲学与宗教》。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2021 年。Pp.308.精装本,39.99 美元。安德烈娅-南丁格尔(Andrea Nightingale)撰写的这部学术著作将被证明是恢复宗教和神学在柏拉图哲学中的中心地位所不可或缺的。她证明了柏拉图使用希腊宗教语言为其形而上学和哲学概念本身提供信息。她巧妙地将古典学术研究与对大量文本的细读交织在一起,从而提出了自己的主张。她对埃利乌西尼奥秘和奥菲克仪式的论述尤为精彩。她还探讨了与 "形式 "相遇的顿悟性如何影响哲学家的灵魂。在引言中,南丁格尔概述了对话中出现的关键 "神性标记"(8-23)--将形式描述为神性的情况、对埃琉西尼和奥尔菲奥秘的引用、关于顿悟式相遇的诗歌叙事以及对神圣奇观的引用。她还评估了为什么这些提法在当代学术研究中经常被忽视,指出许多当代学者不熟悉希腊宗教的特殊性质,以及哲学中普遍存在的世俗主义倾向。她承认有一些值得注意的例外(如马克-麦克弗兰的作品),但她可能也会关注其他作品。特别是吉尔-戈登(Jill Gordon)的《柏拉图的情色世界》(Plato's Erotic World):从宇宙起源到人类死亡》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2012 年)从对神性的追求和疏离两方面描述了柏拉图哲学的特点,而罗斯-罗梅罗的《没有丝毫颤抖:另一个例子是罗斯-罗梅罗(Ross Romero)的《没有丝毫颤栗:柏拉图《斐多》中苏格拉底的牺牲》(The Sacrifice of Socrates in Plato's Phaedo)(奥尔巴尼:纽约州立大学出版社,2009 年),该书探讨了《斐多》中的宗教牺牲。尽管如此,南丁格尔对该领域忽视宗教语言或过快地将其与后来的一神教传统同化的倾向做出了准确的评价。她在书中令人信服地指出,宗教语言可以起到哲学的作用,暗示人们如何体验与 "美 "和 "善 "的结合。全书提供了有关希腊宗教与文化之间许多联系的珍贵信息,这些信息为柏拉图的特定段落增添了深度和丰富性。第 1 章勾勒了形式的理论,并认为作为一个群体,它们被视为 "神圣的"。斐多》将 "形式 "与永恒、不变和可理解性等概念联系起来(50)。人类可以通过沉思与形式联系起来(51)。同样,《共和国》将 "形式 "描述为神圣的,而沉思 "形式 "的灵魂则经历了一种神化。善的形式是最高的神性,对它的追求就是与神的相遇。南丁格尔指出,这并不意味着可以完全掌握 "善"。但柏拉图认为,只要我们能够思考 "善的形式",我们就能认识 "善",并变得更像 "善"。在第二章中,南丁格尔转向了人类渴望的话题,重点是《论语》。柏拉图认为,我们人类对不朽有两种不同但相关的渴望。虽然人类渴望一种神圣的不朽,但这种不朽最终是无法实现的,而人类可以通过对善的向往,生出灵魂的 "孩子",从而获得部分的不朽。对 "美 "的憧憬可以是一种神圣的顿悟,从而产生奇迹。南丁格尔通过《荷马史诗-狄奥尼修斯赞美诗》、希罗多德以及圣所碑文等文本对顿悟的概念进行了更深入的研究。顿悟验证了希腊的宗教体系。同样,柏拉图的形而上学也通过对形式的哲学思考得到了验证 [第 149 页完]。南丁格尔对埃莱乌西尼奥秘的详细论述汇集了许多哲学家所不熟悉的大量原始资料,这对学者们解释柏拉图中暗指奥秘的段落尤其有价值。南丁格尔还对阿尔西比亚德斯进行了引人入胜的解读,认为他在苏格拉底身上遇到了神性,但却未能理解它,因此在人际关系中 "亵渎 "了奥秘(107-13)。第 3 章探讨了苏格拉底在《斐多》中关于灵魂和不朽的论述。而那些...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Since January 2002, the Journal of the History of Philosophy has been published by The Johns Hopkins University Press. For subscriptions, change of address, and back issues, please contact Subscription Services. In addition to photocopying allowed by the "fair use" doctrine, JHP authorizes personal or educational multiple-copying by instructors for use within a course. This policy does not cover photocopying for commercial use either by individuals or publishers. All such uses must be authorized by JHP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信