Review of Computational Techniques for Modelling Eco-Safe Driving Behavior

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
N. Jain, Sangeeta Mittal
{"title":"Review of Computational Techniques for Modelling Eco-Safe Driving Behavior","authors":"N. Jain, Sangeeta Mittal","doi":"10.15282/ijame.20.2.2023.08.0806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Driving is a complex task involving the perception of the driving event, planning response, and action. Safe driving ensures the vehicle’s and its passengers’ safety, whereas economical driving brings down fuel consumption. Eventually, eco-safe driving that ensures economical as well as safe driving is the best bet. This review paper provides a systematic comprehensive analysis across cross-cutting dimensions such as data collection mechanisms, features affecting eco-safe driving, computational models for driving behavior analysis, driver motivational approaches towards eco-safe driving, exploiting research gaps and opportunities for further research in this domain. Driving behavior along with environmental context, including weather information, road conditions, traffic flow and time of travel, represent the most effective factors for doing eco-safe driving analysis. 82% of reviewed papers recommended OBD as a reliable data collection source, along with supplementary information from body sensors and cameras. The K-Mean clustering is an effective driving profiling technique clubbed with dimensionality reduction techniques based on Random Forest regressor, PCA and autoencoders. Deep learning and ensemble learning-based safety approaches utilizing Recurrent Convolutional Networks (RCN), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Decision Tree (DT) have achieved impressive accuracies surpassing 99%, followed by Neural Networks (NN), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) with accuracy ranging from 91% to 96%. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) yielded superior Area Under Curve (AUC of 0.836) for fuel prediction, in comparison to Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Neural Networks (NN). Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) represents fine-grained accurate fuel-prediction methods with accuracy comparable to Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Prominent research gaps identified during this study are the lack of a comprehensive approach covering all aspects related to safety, fuel economy, the scope of improvement in real-time driving risk assessment at appropriate granularity level, missing effective and engaging driving feedback, dealing with uncertain and incomplete driving events, driver’s personal traits affecting driving safety and fuel-economy. The review will help in establishing the readiness of automation of driving analysis for reinforcement of eco-safe driving for various kinds of vehicles plug-in hybrid vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, electric vehicles, and self-driving cars.","PeriodicalId":13935,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.20.2.2023.08.0806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driving is a complex task involving the perception of the driving event, planning response, and action. Safe driving ensures the vehicle’s and its passengers’ safety, whereas economical driving brings down fuel consumption. Eventually, eco-safe driving that ensures economical as well as safe driving is the best bet. This review paper provides a systematic comprehensive analysis across cross-cutting dimensions such as data collection mechanisms, features affecting eco-safe driving, computational models for driving behavior analysis, driver motivational approaches towards eco-safe driving, exploiting research gaps and opportunities for further research in this domain. Driving behavior along with environmental context, including weather information, road conditions, traffic flow and time of travel, represent the most effective factors for doing eco-safe driving analysis. 82% of reviewed papers recommended OBD as a reliable data collection source, along with supplementary information from body sensors and cameras. The K-Mean clustering is an effective driving profiling technique clubbed with dimensionality reduction techniques based on Random Forest regressor, PCA and autoencoders. Deep learning and ensemble learning-based safety approaches utilizing Recurrent Convolutional Networks (RCN), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Decision Tree (DT) have achieved impressive accuracies surpassing 99%, followed by Neural Networks (NN), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) with accuracy ranging from 91% to 96%. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) yielded superior Area Under Curve (AUC of 0.836) for fuel prediction, in comparison to Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Neural Networks (NN). Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) represents fine-grained accurate fuel-prediction methods with accuracy comparable to Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Prominent research gaps identified during this study are the lack of a comprehensive approach covering all aspects related to safety, fuel economy, the scope of improvement in real-time driving risk assessment at appropriate granularity level, missing effective and engaging driving feedback, dealing with uncertain and incomplete driving events, driver’s personal traits affecting driving safety and fuel-economy. The review will help in establishing the readiness of automation of driving analysis for reinforcement of eco-safe driving for various kinds of vehicles plug-in hybrid vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, electric vehicles, and self-driving cars.
生态安全驾驶行为建模计算技术综述
驾驶是一项复杂的任务,涉及对驾驶事件的感知、计划响应和行动。安全驾驶能确保车辆和乘客的安全,而经济驾驶则能降低油耗。最终,既经济又安全的生态安全驾驶才是最佳选择。本综述论文从数据收集机制、影响生态安全驾驶的特征、驾驶行为分析计算模型、驾驶员生态安全驾驶动机激发方法等跨领域角度进行了系统全面的分析,并探讨了该领域的研究空白和进一步研究的机会。驾驶行为与环境背景(包括天气信息、道路状况、交通流量和行车时间)是进行生态安全驾驶分析的最有效因素。82% 的综述论文建议将车载诊断系统作为可靠的数据收集来源,同时使用车身传感器和摄像头作为补充信息。K-Mean 聚类是一种有效的驾驶分析技术,它与基于随机森林回归器、PCA 和自动编码器的降维技术相结合。利用递归卷积网络(RCN)、卷积神经网络(CNN)、长短期记忆(LSTM)和决策树(DT)的基于深度学习和集合学习的安全方法取得了超过 99% 的惊人准确率,其次是神经网络(NN)、支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林(RF),准确率从 91% 到 96% 不等。与支持向量机(SVM)和神经网络(NN)相比,长短期记忆(LSTM)在燃料预测方面的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.836。门控循环单元(GRU)代表了细粒度精确燃料预测方法,其精确度可与长短期记忆(LSTM)相媲美。本研究中发现的主要研究空白包括:缺乏涵盖与安全和燃油经济性有关的所有方面的综合方法;在适当粒度水平上改进实时驾驶风险评估的范围;缺乏有效和吸引人的驾驶反馈;处理不确定和不完整的驾驶事件;影响驾驶安全和燃油经济性的驾驶员个人特征。本综述将有助于确定自动驾驶分析是否已准备就绪,以加强各种车辆的生态安全驾驶,包括插电式混合动力汽车、混合动力电动汽车、电动汽车和自动驾驶汽车。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJAME provides the forum for high-quality research communications and addresses all aspects of original experimental information based on theory and their applications. This journal welcomes all contributions from those who wish to report on new developments in automotive and mechanical engineering fields within the following scopes. -Engine/Emission Technology Automobile Body and Safety- Vehicle Dynamics- Automotive Electronics- Alternative Energy- Energy Conversion- Fuels and Lubricants - Combustion and Reacting Flows- New and Renewable Energy Technologies- Automotive Electrical Systems- Automotive Materials- Automotive Transmission- Automotive Pollution and Control- Vehicle Maintenance- Intelligent Vehicle/Transportation Systems- Fuel Cell, Hybrid, Electrical Vehicle and Other Fields of Automotive Engineering- Engineering Management /TQM- Heat and Mass Transfer- Fluid and Thermal Engineering- CAE/FEA/CAD/CFD- Engineering Mechanics- Modeling and Simulation- Metallurgy/ Materials Engineering- Applied Mechanics- Thermodynamics- Agricultural Machinery and Equipment- Mechatronics- Automatic Control- Multidisciplinary design and optimization - Fluid Mechanics and Dynamics- Thermal-Fluids Machinery- Experimental and Computational Mechanics - Measurement and Instrumentation- HVAC- Manufacturing Systems- Materials Processing- Noise and Vibration- Composite and Polymer Materials- Biomechanical Engineering- Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics- Machine Components design- Gas Turbine- Power Plant Engineering- Artificial Intelligent/Neural Network- Robotic Systems- Solar Energy- Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics- Discrete Systems- Non-linear Analysis- Structural Analysis- Tribology- Engineering Materials- Mechanical Systems and Technology- Pneumatic and Hydraulic Systems - Failure Analysis- Any other related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信