{"title":"Rasionalisasi Kritik Hadis Klasik: Kontribusi Syarif Ḥātim Al-‘Aunī Dalam Kajian Hadis Kontemporer","authors":"M. K. Huda, M. Fadil","doi":"10.32505/al-bukhari.v6i1.6175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the contributions of Syarif Hatim Al-'Auni in the study of hadith in the contemporary era. One of al-'Auni's contributions is the rationalization of classical hadith criticism. According to al-'Auni, classical hadith criticism works within a rational-universal framework. This has an impact on the acceptance of the classical hadith critique method as a scientific method. This research uses a qualitative-descriptive-analytical approach. The main source of research is the book al-Usus al-'Aqliyyah Li'Ilm Naqd al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah. In this context, al-'Auni agrees with Nabia Abbot, Mustafa Azami and Harald Motzki in terms of the reliability of classical hadith criticism methods. On the other hand, Al-'Auni is at odds with scholars who are skeptical of classical hadith criticism methods such as Ignaz Goldziher and Joseph Scacht.","PeriodicalId":407271,"journal":{"name":"Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v6i1.6175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines the contributions of Syarif Hatim Al-'Auni in the study of hadith in the contemporary era. One of al-'Auni's contributions is the rationalization of classical hadith criticism. According to al-'Auni, classical hadith criticism works within a rational-universal framework. This has an impact on the acceptance of the classical hadith critique method as a scientific method. This research uses a qualitative-descriptive-analytical approach. The main source of research is the book al-Usus al-'Aqliyyah Li'Ilm Naqd al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah. In this context, al-'Auni agrees with Nabia Abbot, Mustafa Azami and Harald Motzki in terms of the reliability of classical hadith criticism methods. On the other hand, Al-'Auni is at odds with scholars who are skeptical of classical hadith criticism methods such as Ignaz Goldziher and Joseph Scacht.