Analysis of Grade 10 Opportunity-to-Learn Dynamics of Market from Two Economics Textbooks

Ijeoma C Ogbonnaya,
{"title":"Analysis of Grade 10 Opportunity-to-Learn Dynamics of Market from Two Economics Textbooks","authors":"Ijeoma C Ogbonnaya,","doi":"10.15294/eeaj.v12i2.69848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This theoretical paper analyses the Opportunity-to-Learn (OTL) Dynamics of Market offered in two Grade 10 economics textbooks. The study asked whether opportunities provided in economics textbooks improve learners’ performance in Dynamics of Market. Following a Content Analysis approach, three OTL variables; Content organization, Content coverage and Tasks were used as the theoretical framework to couch this study. One of the findings was that Less High-Order tasks were found in both textbooks hence do not develop learners’ Higher order Cognitive skills. The overall study showed that the analysed economics textbooks do not offer enough OTL Dynamics of Market. This study is significant because it helps both educators and policy makers to explore more on ‘must-have features’ of economics textbook before it could be prescribed for use. It makes contribution to international literature on textbook analysis in the field of economics education, this is rare in economics education studies. It is recommended that Higher order tasks should be included in future editions of the Grade 10 economics textbooks thus, suggesting the need to analyse economics textbooks in high schools for effective learning. Although the study analysed specific textbooks, its findings shed light on how learning opportunities relate to performance more generally.","PeriodicalId":340929,"journal":{"name":"Economic Education Analysis Journal","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Education Analysis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/eeaj.v12i2.69848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This theoretical paper analyses the Opportunity-to-Learn (OTL) Dynamics of Market offered in two Grade 10 economics textbooks. The study asked whether opportunities provided in economics textbooks improve learners’ performance in Dynamics of Market. Following a Content Analysis approach, three OTL variables; Content organization, Content coverage and Tasks were used as the theoretical framework to couch this study. One of the findings was that Less High-Order tasks were found in both textbooks hence do not develop learners’ Higher order Cognitive skills. The overall study showed that the analysed economics textbooks do not offer enough OTL Dynamics of Market. This study is significant because it helps both educators and policy makers to explore more on ‘must-have features’ of economics textbook before it could be prescribed for use. It makes contribution to international literature on textbook analysis in the field of economics education, this is rare in economics education studies. It is recommended that Higher order tasks should be included in future editions of the Grade 10 economics textbooks thus, suggesting the need to analyse economics textbooks in high schools for effective learning. Although the study analysed specific textbooks, its findings shed light on how learning opportunities relate to performance more generally.
10 年级从两本经济学教科书中学习《市场动态》的机会分析
本理论论文分析了两本十年级经济学教科书中提供的 "学习机会"(OTL)《市场动态》。研究询问经济学教科书中提供的机会是否能提高学习者在《市场动态》中的成绩。本研究采用内容分析法,以三个 OTL 变量(内容组织、内容覆盖和任务)作为理论框架。研究结果之一是,两本教科书中的高阶任务较少,因此无法培养学习者的高阶认知技能。总体研究表明,所分析的经济学教科书没有提供足够的 OTL 市场动态。这项研究意义重大,因为它有助于教育工作者和政策制定者在规定使用经济学教科书之前,对其 "必须具备的特征 "进行更多探讨。它为经济学教育领域教科书分析的国际文献做出了贡献,这在经济学教育研究中是罕见的。研究建议在未来版本的 10 年级经济学教科书中加入 "高阶任务",这表明有必要对高中经济学教科书进行分析,以提高学习效率。虽然本研究分析的是具体的教科书,但研究结果却揭示了学习机会与学习成绩之间的普遍关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信