A Comparison of John Dewey and E. D. Hirsch's Thoughts on Determining Quality Educational Goals

Darmawati.R, Mustofa Aji Prayitno, Moh. Solehuddin, B. I. Sappaile, Didik Cahyono
{"title":"A Comparison of John Dewey and E. D. Hirsch's Thoughts on Determining Quality Educational Goals","authors":"Darmawati.R, Mustofa Aji Prayitno, Moh. Solehuddin, B. I. Sappaile, Didik Cahyono","doi":"10.58355/competitive.v2i3.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the views of John Dewey and E. D. Hirsch on determining quality educational goals, and compares the similarities and differences between their approaches. The main objective of this research is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the two prominent educational theorists and their ideas on quality educational goals, and to examine how their approaches differ and overlap. To achieve this objective, the research methodology adopted in this study is a comparative analysis of the two thinkers' views on education. The study begins with a thorough review of the literature on the educational theories of Dewey and Hirsch, followed by a comparative analysis of their approaches. The comparative analysis includes an examination of their perspectives on curriculum development, experiential learning, cultural literacy, and knowledge-based education. The data collected from the literature review and comparative analysis is then synthesized to develop a comprehensive understanding of the similarities and differences between Dewey and Hirsch's approaches to determining quality educational goals. The findings of this research suggest that while Dewey and Hirsch's approaches differ in their emphasis on experiential learning versus cultural literacy, they share a common goal of providing a quality education that prepares students for active and engaged citizenship. Additionally, both Dewey and Hirsch emphasize the importance of effective curriculum development and individualized learning. Education policymakers and practitioners can draw on the insights provided by this research to develop a holistic approach to education that incorporates the strengths of both Dewey and Hirsch's perspectives.","PeriodicalId":371171,"journal":{"name":"COMPETITIVE: Journal of Education","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPETITIVE: Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58355/competitive.v2i3.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the views of John Dewey and E. D. Hirsch on determining quality educational goals, and compares the similarities and differences between their approaches. The main objective of this research is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the two prominent educational theorists and their ideas on quality educational goals, and to examine how their approaches differ and overlap. To achieve this objective, the research methodology adopted in this study is a comparative analysis of the two thinkers' views on education. The study begins with a thorough review of the literature on the educational theories of Dewey and Hirsch, followed by a comparative analysis of their approaches. The comparative analysis includes an examination of their perspectives on curriculum development, experiential learning, cultural literacy, and knowledge-based education. The data collected from the literature review and comparative analysis is then synthesized to develop a comprehensive understanding of the similarities and differences between Dewey and Hirsch's approaches to determining quality educational goals. The findings of this research suggest that while Dewey and Hirsch's approaches differ in their emphasis on experiential learning versus cultural literacy, they share a common goal of providing a quality education that prepares students for active and engaged citizenship. Additionally, both Dewey and Hirsch emphasize the importance of effective curriculum development and individualized learning. Education policymakers and practitioners can draw on the insights provided by this research to develop a holistic approach to education that incorporates the strengths of both Dewey and Hirsch's perspectives.
约翰-杜威和 E. D. 赫希关于确定优质教育目标的思想比较
本文探讨了约翰-杜威(John Dewey)和 E. D. 赫希(E. D. Hirsch)关于确定优质教育目标的观点,并比较了他们在方法上的异同。本研究的主要目的是全面了解这两位著名的教育理论家及其关于优质教育目标的观点,并研究他们的方法有何不同和重叠之处。为实现这一目标,本研究采用的研究方法是对两位思想家的教育观点进行比较分析。本研究首先对杜威和赫希的教育理论文献进行了全面回顾,然后对他们的方法进行了比较分析。比较分析包括研究他们对课程开发、体验式学习、文化素养和知识型教育的观点。然后对从文献综述和比较分析中收集到的数据进行综合,以全面了解杜威和赫希在确定优质教育目标方面的异同。研究结果表明,虽然杜威和赫希的方法在强调体验学习与文化素养方面有所不同,但他们的共同目标是提供优质教育,培养学生成为积极主动的公民。此外,杜威和赫希都强调有效的课程开发和个性化学习的重要性。教育政策制定者和实践者可以借鉴本研究提供的启示,制定出一种融合杜威和赫希观点优点的整体教育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信