On the perceived usefulness and effectiveness of Eduflow as a supplementary tool for online writing instruction

Natasha Stojanovska-Ilievska
{"title":"On the perceived usefulness and effectiveness of Eduflow as a supplementary tool for online writing instruction","authors":"Natasha Stojanovska-Ilievska","doi":"10.18552/joaw.v13i1.890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper centres around the use of Eduflow, a novel online learning management system (LMS) which was introduced in a university-level Academic Writing course in response to the challenges brought about by the mandatory switch from face-to-face to online writing instruction (OWI) over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, Eduflow is piloted with a group of second-year university students of English language and literature at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje. These students chose to fulfil their Academic Writing course requirements by compiling a writing portfolio. The rationale behind the use of this platform was the assumption that it would facilitate the online management of all the stages of the essay writing process: Writing a first draft, doing a peer review of essays created by fellow students, considering the comments received from fellow students, reflecting on one’s own writing by doing a self-review, and finally, submitting the final version. The relentlessness of the pandemic led to the continuous application of this learning management system over the course of two entire academic years, each year with a different group of students. An online survey on the perceived usefulness and effectiveness of Eduflow was administered among the second generation of students who used this platform. As this small-scale analysis demonstrates, despite experiencing some easily resolvable minor technical difficulties, these students generally found Eduflow effective and useful as a supplementary tool for online writing instruction and showed particular appreciation for the collaborative peer review experience.","PeriodicalId":202793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Writing","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v13i1.890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper centres around the use of Eduflow, a novel online learning management system (LMS) which was introduced in a university-level Academic Writing course in response to the challenges brought about by the mandatory switch from face-to-face to online writing instruction (OWI) over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, Eduflow is piloted with a group of second-year university students of English language and literature at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje. These students chose to fulfil their Academic Writing course requirements by compiling a writing portfolio. The rationale behind the use of this platform was the assumption that it would facilitate the online management of all the stages of the essay writing process: Writing a first draft, doing a peer review of essays created by fellow students, considering the comments received from fellow students, reflecting on one’s own writing by doing a self-review, and finally, submitting the final version. The relentlessness of the pandemic led to the continuous application of this learning management system over the course of two entire academic years, each year with a different group of students. An online survey on the perceived usefulness and effectiveness of Eduflow was administered among the second generation of students who used this platform. As this small-scale analysis demonstrates, despite experiencing some easily resolvable minor technical difficulties, these students generally found Eduflow effective and useful as a supplementary tool for online writing instruction and showed particular appreciation for the collaborative peer review experience.
关于将 Eduflow 作为在线写作教学辅助工具的实用性和有效性的看法
Eduflow 是一种新颖的在线学习管理系统 (LMS),在 COVID-19 大流行期间,为了应对从面授到在线写作教学(OWI)的强制转换所带来的挑战,该系统被引入到大学学术写作课程中。本文以斯科普里西里尔和美多迪乌斯大学(Ss.斯科普里西里尔和美多迪乌斯大学的英语语言文学专业二年级学生进行了试点。这些学生选择通过编制写作作品集来达到学术写作课程的要求。使用该平台的理由是假定它将促进论文写作过程所有阶段的在线管理:撰写初稿、对同学的论文进行互评、考虑同学的意见、通过自评反思自己的写作,最后提交最终版本。大流行病的无情导致这一学习管理系统在整整两个学年中持续应用,每年都有不同的学生使用。我们对使用 Eduflow 平台的第二代学生进行了一项在线调查,以了解他们对 Eduflow 的实用性和有效性的看法。正如这项小规模分析所显示的,尽管遇到了一些容易解决的小技术问题,但这些学生普遍认为,Eduflow 作为在线写作教学的辅助工具是有效和有用的,并对协作式同行评阅体验表现出了特别的赞赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信