Written notes and listening comprehension: A correlation study

Joseph Siegel
{"title":"Written notes and listening comprehension: A correlation study","authors":"Joseph Siegel","doi":"10.18552/joaw.v13i1.838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notetaking is a crucial aspect of learning in academic contexts, but as a relatively casual form of academic writing, it seldom receives pedagogic or research attention in the literature. Therefore, as more students study academic content through English as a second language (L2), research on student notetaking as a form of academic writing deserves attention. What students write in their notes and how they do so can play important roles in comprehension and learning. To address this gap, the present study examines 102 sets of notes and corresponding listening comprehension test scores to determine the relationships between four factors of quantity and quality in students’ hand-written notes; namely, notations, words, information units, and efficiency ratio. Results indicate that total notations and total words written in notes do not impact overall test scores, while information units and higher efficiency ratios positively correlate to test scores. The paper closes with pedagogic advice for teachers and students operating in L2 academic contexts with a focus on how best to conceptualise and write notes.","PeriodicalId":202793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Writing","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v13i1.838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Notetaking is a crucial aspect of learning in academic contexts, but as a relatively casual form of academic writing, it seldom receives pedagogic or research attention in the literature. Therefore, as more students study academic content through English as a second language (L2), research on student notetaking as a form of academic writing deserves attention. What students write in their notes and how they do so can play important roles in comprehension and learning. To address this gap, the present study examines 102 sets of notes and corresponding listening comprehension test scores to determine the relationships between four factors of quantity and quality in students’ hand-written notes; namely, notations, words, information units, and efficiency ratio. Results indicate that total notations and total words written in notes do not impact overall test scores, while information units and higher efficiency ratios positively correlate to test scores. The paper closes with pedagogic advice for teachers and students operating in L2 academic contexts with a focus on how best to conceptualise and write notes.
书面笔记与听力理解:相关研究
记笔记是学术背景下学习的一个重要方面,但作为一种相对随意的学术写作形式,它很少受到文献中教学或研究的关注。因此,随着越来越多的学生将英语作为第二语言(L2)来学习学术内容,有关学生记笔记这种学术写作形式的研究值得关注。学生在笔记中写什么以及如何写,对理解和学习起着重要作用。针对这一空白,本研究通过对 102 组笔记和相应的听力理解测试成绩进行研究,以确定学生手写笔记中四个数量和质量因素之间的关系,这四个因素是:记号、单词、信息单位和效率比。结果表明,笔记中的记号总数和单词总数不会影响考试总分,而信息单位和较高的效率比则与考试分数呈正相关。最后,论文就如何更好地构思和撰写笔记为重点,为在第二语言学术环境中工作的教师和学生提供了教学建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信