DELAY DISCOUNTING AND POLYDIPSIA IN SPONTANEOUSLY HYPERTENSIVE (SHR) AND LEWIS (LEW) RATS

CONDUCTUAL Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.59792/gsdu1779
Carlos F. Aparicio
{"title":"DELAY DISCOUNTING AND POLYDIPSIA IN SPONTANEOUSLY HYPERTENSIVE (SHR) AND LEWIS (LEW) RATS","authors":"Carlos F. Aparicio","doi":"10.59792/gsdu1779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared the performance of the Spontaneously Hypertensive rat (SHR) on a delay discounting task with the performance of the Lewis rat (LEW) to suggest that both strains of rats are potential models of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). It measured choice in the initial link of a concurrentchains procedure with presses on two levers arranging entries to two terminal links, one delivering 1-food pellet after a 0.1-s delay and the other 4-food pellets with delays of 0.1, 5, 10, 20, 40 or 80 seconds presented in random order during the session. A bottle with tap water could be available for the rats to drink during the session (B), or it was not available (A) according to an ABABA reversal design. The SHR and LEW rats made impulsive choices producing discounting functions showing discounting rates increasing with increasing training sessions. Early in training the SHR rats produced discounting rates greater than the LEW rats, but at the end of training both strains of rats produced comparable discounting rates. All rats developed polydipsia in condition B, but the SHR rats consumed more water and emitted more licks than the LEW rats. Polydipsia was not linked to discounting rate, nor polydipsia caused the rats’ impulsive choices to decrease.","PeriodicalId":504592,"journal":{"name":"CONDUCTUAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONDUCTUAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59792/gsdu1779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the performance of the Spontaneously Hypertensive rat (SHR) on a delay discounting task with the performance of the Lewis rat (LEW) to suggest that both strains of rats are potential models of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). It measured choice in the initial link of a concurrentchains procedure with presses on two levers arranging entries to two terminal links, one delivering 1-food pellet after a 0.1-s delay and the other 4-food pellets with delays of 0.1, 5, 10, 20, 40 or 80 seconds presented in random order during the session. A bottle with tap water could be available for the rats to drink during the session (B), or it was not available (A) according to an ABABA reversal design. The SHR and LEW rats made impulsive choices producing discounting functions showing discounting rates increasing with increasing training sessions. Early in training the SHR rats produced discounting rates greater than the LEW rats, but at the end of training both strains of rats produced comparable discounting rates. All rats developed polydipsia in condition B, but the SHR rats consumed more water and emitted more licks than the LEW rats. Polydipsia was not linked to discounting rate, nor polydipsia caused the rats’ impulsive choices to decrease.
自发性高血压大鼠(shr)和路易斯大鼠(lew)的延迟贴现和多饮症
本研究比较了自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)和刘易斯大鼠(Lewis)在延迟折现任务中的表现,认为这两种大鼠都是注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)的潜在模型。它测量的是大鼠在同时进行的链式程序中对初始环节的选择,按下两个杠杆可进入两个终端环节,其中一个环节在延迟0.1秒后提供1粒食物,另一个环节在延迟0.1秒、5秒、10秒、20秒、40秒或80秒后提供4粒食物,在整个过程中以随机顺序呈现。根据 ABABA 反向设计,在训练过程中,大鼠可以饮用装有自来水的瓶子(B),也可以不饮用(A)。SHR和LEW大鼠在做出冲动选择时产生的贴现函数显示,贴现率随着训练次数的增加而增加。在训练初期,SHR 大鼠的贴现率高于 LEW 大鼠,但在训练结束时,两种大鼠的贴现率相当。在条件 B 中,所有大鼠都出现了多食症,但 SHR 大鼠比 LEW 大鼠消耗更多的水,发出更多的舔食声。多饮与贴现率无关,多饮也不会导致大鼠冲动性选择的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信