Ahmadiyya Congregation in the Shadow of Religious Politics: Tensions Between Law and Freedom of Religion

Moh. Fadhil, Muhammad Rosyad Sudrajad
{"title":"Ahmadiyya Congregation in the Shadow of Religious Politics: Tensions Between Law and Freedom of Religion","authors":"Moh. Fadhil, Muhammad Rosyad Sudrajad","doi":"10.18784/analisa.v8i1.1829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to freedom of religion is a fundamental right. For Indonesian people, religion is not only seen as a ritual but also as a part of the social relations between society members and the state. However, the sacred value of religion in social relations is degraded through normative recognition in the form of official religious politics. The policy does not actually engender order and justice. On the contrary, official religious political policies and restrictions on religious freedom raise widespread discriminatory practices that affect religious minority groups, such as the Indonesian Ahmadiyya Community. The purpose of this study is to examine the tension between the law and the right to freedom of religion or belief in cases of discrimination against the Ahmadiyya Community of Indonesia from the point of view of the legal theory of legal disorder. The research methods used are socio-legal with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a critical legal study approach using legal disorder theory. This research emphasizes that the Ahmadiyya, as a sect in Islam, has the right to freedom of religion within the Forum Internum. In practice, the official religious politics subordinated the rights of religious freedom under the control of religious majoritarianism. However, empirical facts show that the multireligious social context of Indonesian society places the situation in a state of irregularity. Through the disorder of law theory, Sampford opens the horizons of the legal paradigm, showing that seeing and answering various irregularities cannot be done through the lens of order.","PeriodicalId":102671,"journal":{"name":"Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v8i1.1829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The right to freedom of religion is a fundamental right. For Indonesian people, religion is not only seen as a ritual but also as a part of the social relations between society members and the state. However, the sacred value of religion in social relations is degraded through normative recognition in the form of official religious politics. The policy does not actually engender order and justice. On the contrary, official religious political policies and restrictions on religious freedom raise widespread discriminatory practices that affect religious minority groups, such as the Indonesian Ahmadiyya Community. The purpose of this study is to examine the tension between the law and the right to freedom of religion or belief in cases of discrimination against the Ahmadiyya Community of Indonesia from the point of view of the legal theory of legal disorder. The research methods used are socio-legal with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a critical legal study approach using legal disorder theory. This research emphasizes that the Ahmadiyya, as a sect in Islam, has the right to freedom of religion within the Forum Internum. In practice, the official religious politics subordinated the rights of religious freedom under the control of religious majoritarianism. However, empirical facts show that the multireligious social context of Indonesian society places the situation in a state of irregularity. Through the disorder of law theory, Sampford opens the horizons of the legal paradigm, showing that seeing and answering various irregularities cannot be done through the lens of order.
宗教政治阴影下的艾哈迈迪耶教会:法律与宗教自由之间的紧张关系
宗教自由权是一项基本权利。对印尼人来说,宗教不仅被视为一种仪式,也是社会成员与国家之间社会关系的一部分。然而,宗教在社会关系中的神圣价值却因官方宗教政治形式的规范性认可而被贬低。这种政策实际上并没有带来秩序和正义。相反,官方宗教政治政策和对宗教自由的限制引发了广泛的歧视性做法,影响到宗教少数群体,如印尼艾哈迈迪耶教派。本研究的目的是从法律混乱的法律理论角度出发,探讨在歧视印尼艾哈迈迪耶教派的案件中,法律与宗教或信仰自由权之间的紧张关系。所采用的研究方法是社会-法律的法定方法、概念方法和使用法律混乱理论的批判性法律研究方法。本研究强调,艾哈迈德派作为伊斯兰教的一个教派,在 "国际论坛 "中享有宗教自由权。在实践中,官方宗教政治将宗教自由权置于宗教多数主义的控制之下。然而,经验事实表明,印尼社会的多宗教社会背景使这一状况处于非正常状态。桑普福德通过法律的无序性理论,打开了法律范式的视野,表明不能通过秩序的视角来看待和回答各种不规则性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信