A Comparative Analysis of Students' Understanding in Social Studies: Unraveling the Nuances of Online and Offline Learning

Tsalasah Alfirdausi Zahrah, Vanda Rezania
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Students' Understanding in Social Studies: Unraveling the Nuances of Online and Offline Learning","authors":"Tsalasah Alfirdausi Zahrah, Vanda Rezania","doi":"10.21070/ijemd.v21i3.771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the disparity in students' comprehension of social studies materials during online and offline learning for Class IV SDN Pagerwojo. Employing a non-experimental quantitative ex post facto method, documentation of value data collection was employed as the instrument. The results indicate that online learning yields a mean understanding score of 70 (medium category) with a standard deviation of 10, while offline learning achieves a mean score of 73 (moderate category) with a standard deviation of 13. The findings suggest a discernible variance in students' understanding between the two modes of learning, albeit not significantly pronounced. The implications of this study contribute to the ongoing discourse on optimizing learning environments to better support students' comprehension in social studies subjects. Highlights: Insightful Comparison: This research delves into a comparative analysis of students' understanding of social studies materials in both online and offline learning environments, shedding light on the nuanced differences between the two. Moderate Disparity: The study reveals a moderate variance in students' comprehension levels between online and offline learning, emphasizing the need for further exploration to optimize educational approaches. Implications for Education: The findings have significant implications for educators, highlighting the importance of tailoring teaching strategies to maximize students' understanding of social studies subjects across different learning platforms. Keywords: Students' Understanding, Social Studies, Online Learning, Offline Learning, Comparative Analysis","PeriodicalId":131820,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v21i3.771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the disparity in students' comprehension of social studies materials during online and offline learning for Class IV SDN Pagerwojo. Employing a non-experimental quantitative ex post facto method, documentation of value data collection was employed as the instrument. The results indicate that online learning yields a mean understanding score of 70 (medium category) with a standard deviation of 10, while offline learning achieves a mean score of 73 (moderate category) with a standard deviation of 13. The findings suggest a discernible variance in students' understanding between the two modes of learning, albeit not significantly pronounced. The implications of this study contribute to the ongoing discourse on optimizing learning environments to better support students' comprehension in social studies subjects. Highlights: Insightful Comparison: This research delves into a comparative analysis of students' understanding of social studies materials in both online and offline learning environments, shedding light on the nuanced differences between the two. Moderate Disparity: The study reveals a moderate variance in students' comprehension levels between online and offline learning, emphasizing the need for further exploration to optimize educational approaches. Implications for Education: The findings have significant implications for educators, highlighting the importance of tailoring teaching strategies to maximize students' understanding of social studies subjects across different learning platforms. Keywords: Students' Understanding, Social Studies, Online Learning, Offline Learning, Comparative Analysis
学生对社会学理解的比较分析:解读在线和离线学习的细微差别
本研究探讨了第四班(SDN Pagerwojo)学生在在线和离线学习中对社会研究材料理解的差异。研究采用非实验性的事后定量方法,以价值数据收集文件为工具。结果表明,在线学习的平均理解分数为 70 分(中等),标准偏差为 10 分,而离线学习的平均分数为 73 分(中等),标准偏差为 13 分。研究结果表明,两种学习模式下学生的理解能力存在明显差异,尽管差异并不显著。本研究的意义在于,为更好地帮助学生理解社会研究学科,优化学习环境的讨论仍在继续。 亮点: 富有洞察力的比较:本研究深入比较分析了学生在在线和离线学习环境中对社会研究材料的理解,揭示了两者之间的细微差别。 适度差异:研究揭示了在线学习和离线学习中学生理解水平的适度差异,强调了进一步探索优化教育方法的必要性。 对教育的影响:研究结果对教育工作者具有重要意义,强调了在不同的学习平台上调整教学策略以最大限度地提高学生对社会研究学科的理解能力的重要性。 关键词学生的理解、社会研究、在线学习、离线学习、比较分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信