Learning across Diverse Training Modalities is Different across Gender: Insights from a Neuroergonomics Approach

John Hayes, Shivangi Dwivedi, Isabella Pedron, Joe Gabbard, Ranjana K. Mehta
{"title":"Learning across Diverse Training Modalities is Different across Gender: Insights from a Neuroergonomics Approach","authors":"John Hayes, Shivangi Dwivedi, Isabella Pedron, Joe Gabbard, Ranjana K. Mehta","doi":"10.1177/21695067231205572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent challenges such as COVID-19 call for innovative methods of delivering training. In this study, we compare the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR) based psychomotor learning compared to videobased training. Participants completed either AR or video training to learn four basic AR interactions, before completing an AR evaluation. The AR group reported greater workload during training but demonstrated better performance during evaluation. We used functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to compare brain activation and functional connectivity across groups during evaluation. We found that participants in the AR group displayed smaller brain networks during the evaluation, suggesting more efficient utilization of neural resources. Sex differences in activation and connectivity suggest that men and women potentially employ different neural strategies while learning motor skills in AR. Future studies should examine how these differences could impact performance and user experience in future AR-based training programs.","PeriodicalId":20673,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","volume":"1 1","pages":"2558 - 2559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231205572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent challenges such as COVID-19 call for innovative methods of delivering training. In this study, we compare the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR) based psychomotor learning compared to videobased training. Participants completed either AR or video training to learn four basic AR interactions, before completing an AR evaluation. The AR group reported greater workload during training but demonstrated better performance during evaluation. We used functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to compare brain activation and functional connectivity across groups during evaluation. We found that participants in the AR group displayed smaller brain networks during the evaluation, suggesting more efficient utilization of neural resources. Sex differences in activation and connectivity suggest that men and women potentially employ different neural strategies while learning motor skills in AR. Future studies should examine how these differences could impact performance and user experience in future AR-based training programs.
不同性别在不同培训模式下的学习是不同的:神经工效学方法的启示
最近的挑战(如 COVID-19)需要创新的培训方法。在这项研究中,我们比较了基于增强现实(AR)的心理运动学习与基于视频的培训的效果。参与者在完成增强现实评估之前,通过增强现实或视频培训学习四种基本的增强现实互动。AR组在培训期间的工作量更大,但在评估期间的表现更好。我们使用功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)来比较各组在评估期间的大脑激活和功能连接情况。我们发现,在评估期间,AR 组的参与者显示出更小的大脑网络,这表明他们更有效地利用了神经资源。激活和连接方面的性别差异表明,男性和女性在学习 AR 运动技能时可能采用了不同的神经策略。未来的研究应探讨这些差异会如何影响未来基于 AR 的培训项目的表现和用户体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信