Comparison of the effect of conventional nasal packing and merocel packing following deviated septal surgeries

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
F. John, R. Valli, T. Kiren
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of conventional nasal packing and merocel packing following deviated septal surgeries","authors":"F. John, R. Valli, T. Kiren","doi":"10.4103/jss.jss_35_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Nasal packs are necessary after nasal surgery for hemostasis and internal stabilization of bony and cartilaginous structures. Aims: The study was done to compare the outcomes of conventional nasal packing and Merocel packing in terms of the middle ear pressure, mucociliary clearance, patient comfort, and complication. Settings and Design: A prospective study was conducted among 40 patients in a tertiary care center for 18 months. Subjects and Methods: The patients between 18 and 50 years and who underwent septal surgery were included in the study. The patients with any history of ciliary dysfunction, who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery with septoplasty, and any middle ear diseases were excluded from the study. The patients were divided into Group 1, which had conventional nasal pack and Group 2, which had Merocel postoperatively. All the patients were assessed with impedance audiometry and sacchrin test preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 2 and 4 weeks and these were compared between the 2 groups. During pack removal, pain and bleeding and postoperative complications were also compared between the groups. Statistical Analysis Used: The difference between the two-group comparison student t-tests, the differences between the right and left sides of the same tests paired t-test. The association/difference between categorical variables Chi-square test was calculated at a 5% level of significance. Results: Group 1 and Group 2 had a mean age of 38.47 and 37.47, respectively. Gender predisposition in Group 2 is 1:1 and in Group 1 is 3:2. The middle ear pressure returns to normal by 2nd week in Group 2 compared to Group 1, which improved by 4th week (P < 0.05). The mucociliary clearance reverts to normal by 1st week in Group 2 and 4th week in Group 1 (P = 0.0001) was statistically significant. Group 2 had lesser pain scores assessed using visual analog scores (P = 0.0001) and less bleeding (P = 0.01), which was statistically significant. Group 2 has fewer postoperative complications. Conclusions: The conventional and Merocel packs were both effective packs. In terms of mucociliary clearance, the middle ear pressure Merocel packing was better, and conventional nasal packing had more incidence in terms of postoperative complications.","PeriodicalId":55681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Scientific Society","volume":"46 1","pages":"389 - 393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Scientific Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jss.jss_35_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Nasal packs are necessary after nasal surgery for hemostasis and internal stabilization of bony and cartilaginous structures. Aims: The study was done to compare the outcomes of conventional nasal packing and Merocel packing in terms of the middle ear pressure, mucociliary clearance, patient comfort, and complication. Settings and Design: A prospective study was conducted among 40 patients in a tertiary care center for 18 months. Subjects and Methods: The patients between 18 and 50 years and who underwent septal surgery were included in the study. The patients with any history of ciliary dysfunction, who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery with septoplasty, and any middle ear diseases were excluded from the study. The patients were divided into Group 1, which had conventional nasal pack and Group 2, which had Merocel postoperatively. All the patients were assessed with impedance audiometry and sacchrin test preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 2 and 4 weeks and these were compared between the 2 groups. During pack removal, pain and bleeding and postoperative complications were also compared between the groups. Statistical Analysis Used: The difference between the two-group comparison student t-tests, the differences between the right and left sides of the same tests paired t-test. The association/difference between categorical variables Chi-square test was calculated at a 5% level of significance. Results: Group 1 and Group 2 had a mean age of 38.47 and 37.47, respectively. Gender predisposition in Group 2 is 1:1 and in Group 1 is 3:2. The middle ear pressure returns to normal by 2nd week in Group 2 compared to Group 1, which improved by 4th week (P < 0.05). The mucociliary clearance reverts to normal by 1st week in Group 2 and 4th week in Group 1 (P = 0.0001) was statistically significant. Group 2 had lesser pain scores assessed using visual analog scores (P = 0.0001) and less bleeding (P = 0.01), which was statistically significant. Group 2 has fewer postoperative complications. Conclusions: The conventional and Merocel packs were both effective packs. In terms of mucociliary clearance, the middle ear pressure Merocel packing was better, and conventional nasal packing had more incidence in terms of postoperative complications.
鼻中隔偏曲手术后传统鼻腔填料与 merocel 填料的效果比较
背景:鼻腔手术后必须进行鼻腔填塞,以止血并在内部稳定骨和软骨结构。目的:本研究比较了传统鼻腔填料和 Merocel 填料在中耳压力、粘液纤毛清除率、患者舒适度和并发症方面的效果。设置与设计:在一家三级医疗中心对 40 名患者进行了为期 18 个月的前瞻性研究。研究对象和方法:研究对象包括年龄在 18 至 50 岁之间接受鼻中隔手术的患者。有睫状肌功能障碍病史、接受过功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术和鼻中隔成形术的患者以及患有中耳疾病的患者不在研究范围内。患者被分为使用传统鼻腔填料的第一组和术后使用美罗凯尔的第二组。所有患者在术前、术后 1 周、2 周和 4 周均接受了阻抗测听和蔗糖试验,并对两组患者进行了比较。此外,还比较了两组患者在拆除包装时的疼痛、出血和术后并发症情况。统计分析:两组比较的差异采用学生 t 检验,相同检验的左右两侧差异采用配对 t 检验。分类变量之间的关联/差异采用卡方检验(Chi-square test),显著性水平为 5%。结果第 1 组和第 2 组的平均年龄分别为 38.47 岁和 37.47 岁。第 2 组的性别比例为 1:1,第 1 组为 3:2。第 2 组的中耳压力在第 2 周恢复正常,而第 1 组在第 4 周有所改善(P < 0.05)。第 2 组的粘液纤毛清除率在第 1 周恢复正常,而第 1 组在第 4 周恢复正常(P = 0.0001),差异有统计学意义。用视觉模拟评分法评估,第 2 组的疼痛评分较低(P = 0.0001),出血较少(P = 0.01),有统计学意义。第 2 组术后并发症较少。结论:传统药包和 Merocel 药包都是有效的药包。就粘液纤毛清除率而言,中耳压美洛昔尔填料更好,而传统鼻腔填料术后并发症发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Scientific Society
Journal of the Scientific Society MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信