Method of expert assessment of candidates in the project team safety-oriented systems

O. Kovalchuk, O. Zachko, Dmytro Kobylkin
{"title":"Method of expert assessment of candidates in the project team safety-oriented systems","authors":"O. Kovalchuk, O. Zachko, Dmytro Kobylkin","doi":"10.32347/2412-9933.2023.55.55-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expert evaluation of project candidates is an important component of effective project management and recruitment. The peer review process begins with the identification of relevant criteria and key performance indicators (KPIs) specific to the project's requirements. These criteria are the basis for evaluating candidates. Experts, who are usually experienced professionals in the relevant field, are carefully selected to form the assessment team. The diversity of experience within this group ensures a comprehensive assessment. During the evaluation phase, candidates are evaluated against predetermined criteria. Experts may use a variety of assessment methods, including interviews, skills assessments and portfolio reviews. Each expert provides independent evaluations and scores for each candidate based on their judgment and experience. The scores collected are then aggregated and analyzed to identify the top performing candidates. The results serve as a valuable resource for decisionmaking during candidate selection. To implement innovative ideas and tasks, it is advisable to use a project-oriented approach, which has proven itself positively all over the world. The use of PmBOK, P2M, Prince2, Agile and Kanban methodologies allow project managers to effectively build processes and manage the stages of the project life cycle, which is aimed at realizing the ideas of the final product or service. The life cycle of the formation of a civil defense team should be flexible and adaptable to external factors and influences. From the point of view of the system approach, adaptation is the process of changing the parameters and structure of the system, in particular, controlling influences, based on current information in order to achieve a certain, usually optimal, state of the system in the face of initial uncertainty in the operating conditions. A system that can adapt to changes in internal and external conditions is considered adaptive. Adaptive control is control in a system with incomplete information about the controlled process, which changes as information accumulates and is used to improve the quality of the system.","PeriodicalId":321731,"journal":{"name":"Management of Development of Complex Systems","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Development of Complex Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2023.55.55-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Expert evaluation of project candidates is an important component of effective project management and recruitment. The peer review process begins with the identification of relevant criteria and key performance indicators (KPIs) specific to the project's requirements. These criteria are the basis for evaluating candidates. Experts, who are usually experienced professionals in the relevant field, are carefully selected to form the assessment team. The diversity of experience within this group ensures a comprehensive assessment. During the evaluation phase, candidates are evaluated against predetermined criteria. Experts may use a variety of assessment methods, including interviews, skills assessments and portfolio reviews. Each expert provides independent evaluations and scores for each candidate based on their judgment and experience. The scores collected are then aggregated and analyzed to identify the top performing candidates. The results serve as a valuable resource for decisionmaking during candidate selection. To implement innovative ideas and tasks, it is advisable to use a project-oriented approach, which has proven itself positively all over the world. The use of PmBOK, P2M, Prince2, Agile and Kanban methodologies allow project managers to effectively build processes and manage the stages of the project life cycle, which is aimed at realizing the ideas of the final product or service. The life cycle of the formation of a civil defense team should be flexible and adaptable to external factors and influences. From the point of view of the system approach, adaptation is the process of changing the parameters and structure of the system, in particular, controlling influences, based on current information in order to achieve a certain, usually optimal, state of the system in the face of initial uncertainty in the operating conditions. A system that can adapt to changes in internal and external conditions is considered adaptive. Adaptive control is control in a system with incomplete information about the controlled process, which changes as information accumulates and is used to improve the quality of the system.
对项目组安全系统候选人进行专家评估的方法
对项目候选人进行专家评估是有效项目管理和招聘的重要组成部分。同行评审过程首先要确定针对项目要求的相关标准和关键绩效指标 (KPI)。这些标准是评估候选人的依据。 专家通常是相关领域经验丰富的专业人士,他们经过精心挑选,组成评估小组。该小组成员经验丰富,确保了评估的全面性。在评估阶段,将根据预先确定的标准对候选人进行评估。专家们可能会使用各种评估方法,包括面试、技能评估和作品集审查。每位专家根据自己的判断和经验对每位候选人进行独立评估和打分。然后对收集到的分数进行汇总和分析,以确定表现最佳的候选人。结果可作为候选人遴选过程中决策的宝贵资源。要实施创新理念和任务,最好采用以项目为导向的方法。 通过使用 PmBOK、P2M、Prince2、敏捷和看板方法,项目经理可以有效地建立流程并管理项目生命周期的各个阶段,从而实现最终产品或服务的构想。组建民防队伍的生命周期应具有灵活性,并能适应外部因素和影响。从系统方法的角度来看,适应是根据当前信息改变系统参数和结构,特别是控制影响因素的过程,目的是在运行条件最初不确定的情况下,使系统达到某种状态,通常是最佳状态。能够适应内部和外部条件变化的系统被视为自适应系统。自适应控制是在受控过程信息不完整的情况下对系统进行的控制,随着信息的积累而发生变化,并用于提高系统的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信