Analysis of the Effects of Applying Reflective Ways of Actualizing the Psychological Resourcefulness of a Personality

O. Shtepa
{"title":"Analysis of the Effects of Applying Reflective Ways of Actualizing the Psychological Resourcefulness of a Personality","authors":"O. Shtepa","doi":"10.32626/2227-6246.2023-61.138-163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to find out the effects of actualizing psychological resourcefulness empirically in various reflective ways. Methods of the research. One of the qualitative methods of data processing was applied – the method of psychological casuistry, as well as empirical methods - comparative and cluster analysis. The empirical study was conducted according to the Joyce’s model, which allows comparing the results of two identical stages of research for analysis and reflection. A psychological survey (selfassessment method) determines the level of psychological resources. Research results. The hypothesis that an indicator of the actualization of psychological resources is an increase in the level of resource management indicators was confirmed: for each of the methods of actualization of resources, there was a certain increase in the level of knowledge of self-own resources and the ability to accommodate and update them. The hypothesis that different changes in the level and ratio of certain psychological resources will occur for each reflective method of resource actualization is partially confirmed, in particular, using the example of the contingency method and the method of analyzing experience. In the way of eventuality, a person’s faith in goodness becomes effective and realistic, and the ability to update one’s resources becomes concrete; in the way of analyzing experience, a person’s faith in goodness acquires the opportunity to be revealed through mercy in various and unpredictable life situations, and the ability to renew one’s resources also acquires concretization. Conclusions. It is not advisable to determine the most effective among the methods of actualization of resources, at the same time, the results of the study make it possible to assert that the reflexive method of actualization of psychological resources is effective for a person, by which she can increase the level of functional and basic resources. It is appropriate to pay attention to the ratio of actualization resources (predictors) and actualization (effects), namely: the resource «faith in good», the resource «kindness to people», the resource «helping others», the ability to operate resources – knowledge of resources, the ability to update and accommodate them.","PeriodicalId":250456,"journal":{"name":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","volume":"164 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2023-61.138-163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to find out the effects of actualizing psychological resourcefulness empirically in various reflective ways. Methods of the research. One of the qualitative methods of data processing was applied – the method of psychological casuistry, as well as empirical methods - comparative and cluster analysis. The empirical study was conducted according to the Joyce’s model, which allows comparing the results of two identical stages of research for analysis and reflection. A psychological survey (selfassessment method) determines the level of psychological resources. Research results. The hypothesis that an indicator of the actualization of psychological resources is an increase in the level of resource management indicators was confirmed: for each of the methods of actualization of resources, there was a certain increase in the level of knowledge of self-own resources and the ability to accommodate and update them. The hypothesis that different changes in the level and ratio of certain psychological resources will occur for each reflective method of resource actualization is partially confirmed, in particular, using the example of the contingency method and the method of analyzing experience. In the way of eventuality, a person’s faith in goodness becomes effective and realistic, and the ability to update one’s resources becomes concrete; in the way of analyzing experience, a person’s faith in goodness acquires the opportunity to be revealed through mercy in various and unpredictable life situations, and the ability to renew one’s resources also acquires concretization. Conclusions. It is not advisable to determine the most effective among the methods of actualization of resources, at the same time, the results of the study make it possible to assert that the reflexive method of actualization of psychological resources is effective for a person, by which she can increase the level of functional and basic resources. It is appropriate to pay attention to the ratio of actualization resources (predictors) and actualization (effects), namely: the resource «faith in good», the resource «kindness to people», the resource «helping others», the ability to operate resources – knowledge of resources, the ability to update and accommodate them.
运用反思性方法实现人格心理资源化的效果分析
文章的目的是通过各种反思方式,实证性地找出实现心理机智的效果。研究方法。采用了定性数据处理方法之一--心理案例分析法,以及实证方法--比较分析法和聚类分析法。实证研究是根据乔伊斯模式进行的,该模式允许比较两个相同研究阶段的结果,以便进行分析和思考。心理调查(自我评估法)确定了心理资源的水平。研究结果。心理资源现实化的一个指标是资源管理指标水平的提高,这一假设得到了证实:对于每一种资源现实化方法,对自我资源的了解程度以及容纳和更新自我资源的能力都有一定程度的提高。特别是以偶发事件法和经验分析法为例,部分证实了每种资源现实化的反思方法会使某些心理资源的水平和比例发生不同变化的假设。在偶发事件法中,一个人对善的信仰变得有效而现实,更新资源的能力也变得具体;在经验分析法中,一个人对善的信仰获得了在各种不可预知的生活情境中通过仁慈彰显的机会,更新资源的能力也获得了具体化。结论。在各种资源现实化方法中确定最有效的方法并不可取,但研究结果可以断言,心理 资源现实化的反思方法对一个人是有效的,通过这种方法她可以提高功能资源和基本资源 的水平。应该注意现实化资源(预测因素)和现实化(效果)的比例,即:"相信善 "资源、"与人为善 "资源、"帮助他人 "资源、操作资源的能力--对资源的了解、更新和容纳资源的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信