Association between Subjective Health Perception and Cohabitation Status of the Elderly

H. h
{"title":"Association between Subjective Health Perception and Cohabitation Status of the Elderly","authors":"H. h","doi":"10.14251/jscm.2023.9.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is for verifying the association between subjective health status and cohabitation status of elderly group in Korea. the 8th National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES Ⅷ-2) raw data used for analysis. The respondents of this research were 2,314 people aged 60 and older. Data analysis was performed by SPSS. Chi-square analysis was performed for differences of subjective health perception and general characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was performed for to analyze factors related to subjective health perception and cohabitation status. In 60s age group, gender, household income, education level, cohabitation status, drinking were related to subjective health perception. In 70s, gender, education level, walking were related to subjective health perception. In 80 and older, household income, walking were related to subjective health perception, In logistic regression analysis, subjective health perception in 60s age group was 2.1 times higher in the case of cohabitation (yes) compared to cohabitation (no). Subjective health status have been related to successful aging. This research' result would be used for basic data for the developing an intervention program to improve subjective health perception in the elderly.","PeriodicalId":395795,"journal":{"name":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14251/jscm.2023.9.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is for verifying the association between subjective health status and cohabitation status of elderly group in Korea. the 8th National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES Ⅷ-2) raw data used for analysis. The respondents of this research were 2,314 people aged 60 and older. Data analysis was performed by SPSS. Chi-square analysis was performed for differences of subjective health perception and general characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was performed for to analyze factors related to subjective health perception and cohabitation status. In 60s age group, gender, household income, education level, cohabitation status, drinking were related to subjective health perception. In 70s, gender, education level, walking were related to subjective health perception. In 80 and older, household income, walking were related to subjective health perception, In logistic regression analysis, subjective health perception in 60s age group was 2.1 times higher in the case of cohabitation (yes) compared to cohabitation (no). Subjective health status have been related to successful aging. This research' result would be used for basic data for the developing an intervention program to improve subjective health perception in the elderly.
老年人的主观健康感知与同居状况之间的关系
本研究的目的是验证韩国老年人群的主观健康状况与同居状况之间的关联。分析使用的是第八次国民健康与营养调查(KNHANES Ⅷ-2)的原始数据。调查对象为 2314 名 60 岁及以上的老年人。数据分析采用 SPSS 软件进行。对主观健康感知和一般特征的差异进行了卡方分析。为分析与主观健康感知和同居状况相关的因素,进行了逻辑回归分析。在 60 岁年龄组中,性别、家庭收入、教育水平、同居状况和饮酒与主观健康感受有关。在 70 岁年龄组中,性别、教育水平、步行与主观健康感受有关。在逻辑回归分析中,与同居(无)相比,60 年代年龄组中同居(有)的人的主观健康感受要高出 2.1 倍。主观健康状况与成功老龄化有关。这项研究成果将为制定干预计划提供基础数据,以改善老年人的主观健康感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信