The "graphic design" for 旅 'troops' and 車 'chariot' in oracle-bone and bronze inscriptions

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Chrystelle Maréchal, Ken-ichi Takashima
{"title":"The \"graphic design\" for 旅 'troops' and 車 'chariot' in oracle-bone and bronze inscriptions","authors":"Chrystelle Maréchal, Ken-ichi Takashima","doi":"10.1353/jcl.2023.a911851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This paper argues that there were in the minds of the creators of Chinese characters what we refer to as \"graphic designs\" (abbreviated as \"GD\"—for the other acronyms used hereinafter, see \"Symbols and Abbreviations of the Frequently Used Terms and the Authors' Names\" at the end of the paper). The GD is generally inseparable from the underlying lexeme, and this paper is a case study of the two, and other related, words, in connection specifically with their graphic representations. The GD for the OBI graphs [inline-graphic 01], [inline-graphic 02], and [inline-graphic 03], which appear to be pictographs, is as simple as the UM of the word chē 車 'chariot', namely, \"chariot/wheel\". Its presumed sound—*k-hla~*ka-hla—and the meaning may not have participated in any WF in Shāng Chinese because it was a loan word from an IE language and was not yet integrated in the contemporary lexicological system. A basis for this is that another reading jū, assumed as *ka~*kəlja, had not yet developed. The simplicity of the GD and UM of 車, however, is in contrast with the complexity of its origins and its uses: (1) what is the phonetic in lǚ [inline-graphic 204], [inline-graphic 205] and in BI graphs like [inline-graphic 04], [inline-graphic 05], [inline-graphic 06]? If all these write the word 旅, a question arises: which (pre-)OC form, chē/*k-hla~*ka-hla or jū/*ka~*kəlja, was original? We have suggested that the latter arose after the original, chē/*k-hla~*ka-hla, was sufficiently circulated and came into being as a result of the mono-syllabification of *ka-hla 車; (2) since many IE languages have the initial k- for 車 'wheel/chariot', reconstructing the pre-initial *k- for this Chinese loan word makes sense; (3) we have narrowed down the introduction of the chariot and its word into China to ca. 1200 BC, during the reign of King Wǔ Dīng 武丁 (ca. 1230–1171 BC); (4) we have also tried to answer the question: can we account for the frequent use in the late Shāng-early Zhōu BI of the 車 element, and its disappearance after early Western Zhōu? This question has taken us to examine the history of warfare, the ancient industry of chariot and wheel making, and the utilitarian and symbolic value of the chariot in ancient China.摘要:本文提出造字之初造字者已有所謂\"造字設計\"或者\"古文字構形設計\"(即 \"graphic design\",以下簡稱為\"GD\";文中所用英文縮寫皆見文末 \"Symbols and Abbreviations of the Frequently Used Terms and the Authors' Names\"附表),而這種\"GD\"基本上是與原本的詞位不可分割的。本文將以(早期)上古漢語中\"旅\"與\"車\"兩詞為例探討兩者及與其相關諸詞的古文字構形問題。","PeriodicalId":44675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":"27 1","pages":"522 - 550"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2023.a911851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This paper argues that there were in the minds of the creators of Chinese characters what we refer to as "graphic designs" (abbreviated as "GD"—for the other acronyms used hereinafter, see "Symbols and Abbreviations of the Frequently Used Terms and the Authors' Names" at the end of the paper). The GD is generally inseparable from the underlying lexeme, and this paper is a case study of the two, and other related, words, in connection specifically with their graphic representations. The GD for the OBI graphs [inline-graphic 01], [inline-graphic 02], and [inline-graphic 03], which appear to be pictographs, is as simple as the UM of the word chē 車 'chariot', namely, "chariot/wheel". Its presumed sound—*k-hla~*ka-hla—and the meaning may not have participated in any WF in Shāng Chinese because it was a loan word from an IE language and was not yet integrated in the contemporary lexicological system. A basis for this is that another reading jū, assumed as *ka~*kəlja, had not yet developed. The simplicity of the GD and UM of 車, however, is in contrast with the complexity of its origins and its uses: (1) what is the phonetic in lǚ [inline-graphic 204], [inline-graphic 205] and in BI graphs like [inline-graphic 04], [inline-graphic 05], [inline-graphic 06]? If all these write the word 旅, a question arises: which (pre-)OC form, chē/*k-hla~*ka-hla or jū/*ka~*kəlja, was original? We have suggested that the latter arose after the original, chē/*k-hla~*ka-hla, was sufficiently circulated and came into being as a result of the mono-syllabification of *ka-hla 車; (2) since many IE languages have the initial k- for 車 'wheel/chariot', reconstructing the pre-initial *k- for this Chinese loan word makes sense; (3) we have narrowed down the introduction of the chariot and its word into China to ca. 1200 BC, during the reign of King Wǔ Dīng 武丁 (ca. 1230–1171 BC); (4) we have also tried to answer the question: can we account for the frequent use in the late Shāng-early Zhōu BI of the 車 element, and its disappearance after early Western Zhōu? This question has taken us to examine the history of warfare, the ancient industry of chariot and wheel making, and the utilitarian and symbolic value of the chariot in ancient China.摘要:本文提出造字之初造字者已有所謂"造字設計"或者"古文字構形設計"(即 "graphic design",以下簡稱為"GD";文中所用英文縮寫皆見文末 "Symbols and Abbreviations of the Frequently Used Terms and the Authors' Names"附表),而這種"GD"基本上是與原本的詞位不可分割的。本文將以(早期)上古漢語中"旅"與"車"兩詞為例探討兩者及與其相關諸詞的古文字構形問題。
甲骨文和青铜器铭文中 "旅 "和 "车 "的 "图形设计
摘要:本文认为,在汉字的创造者心目中,存在着我们所说的 "图形设计"(简称 "GD"--下文使用的其他缩略语见文末 "常用术语的符号和缩略语及作者姓名")。一般来说,GD 与底层词素密不可分,本文是对这两个词以及其他相关词的案例研究,特别是与它们的图形表示相关的案例研究。OBI 图形[inline-graphic 01]、[inline-graphic 02]和[inline-graphic 03]似乎是象形文字,它们的 GD 就像 chē 车 "辂 "这个词的 UM 一样简单,即 "辂/轮"。它的假定音--*k-hla~*ka-hla--和意义在上庸汉语中可能没有参与任何 WF,因为它是从一种 IE 语言借来的词,还没有被纳入当代词汇系统。其依据是,另一个读音 jū(假定为 *ka~*kəlja)尚未形成。然而,车的 GD 和 UM 的简单性与其起源和用途的复杂性形成鲜明对比:(1) lǚ [inline-graphic 204]、[inline-graphic 205] 和 BI 图形 [inline-graphic 04]、[inline-graphic 05]、[inline-graphic 06] 中的语音是什么?如果所有这些都写旅字,那么就会出现一个问题:chē/*k-hla~*ka-hla 和 jū/*ka~*kəlja 哪个(前)OC 形式是原始的?我们认为,后者是在chē/*k-hla~*ka-hla这个原词充分流传之后产生的,是*ka-hla车的单音节化的结果;(2)由于许多中欧语言的车 "轮子/战车 "的首字母都是k-,因此重建这个中国借词的前首字母*k-是有意义的;(3)我们把战车及其词传入中国的时间缩小到约公元前1200年,即公元前1200年,当时中国的战车还没有出现。(4) 我们还试图回答这样一个问题:我们能否解释 "车 "这一元素在商末周初 BI 中的频繁使用,以及它在西周早期之后的消失?这个问题带领我们考察了中国古代战争史、古代战车和车轮制造行业,以及战车在中国古代的功用和象征价值。摘要:本文提出造字之初造字者已有所謂 "造字設計 "或者 "古文字構形設計"(即 "graphic design",以下簡稱為 "GD";文中所用英文縮寫皆見文末 "Symbols and Abbreviations of the Frequently Used Terms and the Author names")。本文將以(早期)上古漢語中 "旅 "與 "車 "兩詞為例探討兩者及與其相關諸詞的古文字構形問題。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) is an academic journal, which comprises research content from both general linguistics and Chinese linguistics. It is edited by a distinguished editorial board of international expertise. There are two publications: Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) and Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series (JCLMS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信