Kleist in Italy: An Icon of Gendered Conflicts

Mariaenrica Giannuzzi
{"title":"Kleist in Italy: An Icon of Gendered Conflicts","authors":"Mariaenrica Giannuzzi","doi":"10.1353/dia.2022.a908408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this essay I analyze citational practices around Heinrich von Kleist in Italian postmodern theater and Italian feminist biopolitics. In this realm, the reference to Kleist performs a gesture of interruption of traditional eroticism (Catholic, modern, based on women’s sexual slavery), in particular, by using and rewriting Kleist’s narrative of the Amazons, the legendary tribe of women who would cut their breast to embrace the art of war. Postmodern citations of Kleist introduce a new language around sexuality instead of reenacting the ferocious narrative embedded in the ancient icon. The essay conducts a contrastive reading of two postmodern versions of the Kleistian Amazon in Italy: the first version is Lina Mangiacapre’s and Angela Putino’s philosophical conversation in “Androgina/Amazzone” as well as in Mangiacapre’s stage plays; the second version is Carmelo Bene’s cycle of performances on Achilles’s “necrophilia.” While intellectuals like Laura Mulvey in the UK and Gilles Deleuze in France tend to condemn Kleist for his necrophiliac account of romantic love, in Italy Kleist’s pessimistic image of romantic relationships offers a queer standpoint to develop a sustained critique of violent forms of desire.","PeriodicalId":11350,"journal":{"name":"Diacritics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diacritics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2022.a908408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In this essay I analyze citational practices around Heinrich von Kleist in Italian postmodern theater and Italian feminist biopolitics. In this realm, the reference to Kleist performs a gesture of interruption of traditional eroticism (Catholic, modern, based on women’s sexual slavery), in particular, by using and rewriting Kleist’s narrative of the Amazons, the legendary tribe of women who would cut their breast to embrace the art of war. Postmodern citations of Kleist introduce a new language around sexuality instead of reenacting the ferocious narrative embedded in the ancient icon. The essay conducts a contrastive reading of two postmodern versions of the Kleistian Amazon in Italy: the first version is Lina Mangiacapre’s and Angela Putino’s philosophical conversation in “Androgina/Amazzone” as well as in Mangiacapre’s stage plays; the second version is Carmelo Bene’s cycle of performances on Achilles’s “necrophilia.” While intellectuals like Laura Mulvey in the UK and Gilles Deleuze in France tend to condemn Kleist for his necrophiliac account of romantic love, in Italy Kleist’s pessimistic image of romantic relationships offers a queer standpoint to develop a sustained critique of violent forms of desire.
克莱斯特在意大利:性别冲突的象征
摘要:在这篇文章中,我分析了意大利后现代戏剧和意大利女权主义生物政治学中围绕海因里希-冯-克莱斯特的引用实践。在这一领域中,对克莱斯特的引用是对传统情色主义(天主教的、现代的、基于女性性奴役的)的一种中断,特别是通过使用和改写克莱斯特关于亚马逊人的叙述,亚马逊人是传说中的女性部落,她们为了接受战争艺术而割破自己的乳房。后现代对克莱斯特作品的引用引入了围绕性的新语言,而不是重演古代图腾中的凶残叙事。文章对意大利克莱斯特亚马逊的两个后现代版本进行了对比解读:第一个版本是莉娜-曼吉亚卡普和安吉拉-普蒂诺在《安德罗吉娜/阿玛佐内》中的哲学对话以及曼吉亚卡普的舞台剧;第二个版本是卡梅洛-贝内关于阿基里斯 "恋尸癖 "的一系列表演。英国的劳拉-穆尔维(Laura Mulvey)和法国的吉尔-德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)等知识分子倾向于谴责克莱斯特对浪漫爱情的恋尸癖描述,而在意大利,克莱斯特对浪漫爱情关系的悲观描绘则提供了一个同性恋的立场,对暴力形式的欲望进行持续的批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信