CAN WE KNOW THAT GOD EXISTS SIMPLY BY THINKING ABOUT IT?

Adriana Sima
{"title":"CAN WE KNOW THAT GOD EXISTS SIMPLY BY THINKING ABOUT IT?","authors":"Adriana Sima","doi":"10.35603/sws.iscah.2023/s10.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of whether we can know that God exists simply by thinking about it has been explored by various philosophers throughout history. Let�s examine the ideas of Plato, Saint Augustine of Hippo, Saint Anselm, Thomas Aquinas, Rene Descartes, and Lucian Blaga on this topic. Plato�s philosophy centered around the idea of forms or ideal concepts. While he did not explicitly argue for the existence of a monotheistic God, he believed in a transcendent realm of perfect forms that served as the ultimate source of reality. According to Plato, through philosophical contemplation and reason, one could gain knowledge of these forms, including the form of the good, which could be equated with a divine or godlike entity. Saint Augustine of Hippo sought to reconcile faith and reason and believed that rational inquiry could lead to knowledge of God�s existence. He argued that God�s existence could be known through introspection and reflection on one�s own existence. Augustine believed that God�s existence is self-evident and that every thought we have depends on the existence of a supreme, unchanging and eternal being. Saint Anselm proposed the ontological argument for the existence of God. He argued that we can conceive of a being greater than which nothing can be conceived. According to Anselm, if such a being exists in the understanding alone, it could also exist in reality, which is even greater. Therefore, God must exist in reality. Anselm�s argument relies on the idea that the concept of God contains the concept of necessary existence. Thomas Aquinas developed the cosmological argument, which asserts that everything in the universe has a cause, and ultimately there must be an uncaused cause (God) that initiates the chain of causes. Aquinas believed that reason could lead us to knowledge of God�s existence through observation of the natural world and logical deduction. He believed that God�s existence is self-evident and can be understood through natural theology. Rene Descartes known for his phrase �I think, therefore I am,� sought to establish a foundation of knowledge through rational inquiry. While his philosophical project primarily focused on skepticism and the existence of the self, Descartes also argued for the existence of God. He posited that the idea of God, as a perfect and infinite being, could not have originated from himself, a finite and imperfect being. Therefore, he concluded that the idea of God must have been implanted by a higher power, namely God himself. Lucian Blaga, a Romanian philosopher, addressed the problem of God�s existence from a phenomenological perspective. He argued that God�s existence is not a factual truth that can be proven or disproven by rational thought alone. Instead, Blaga emphasized the importance of subjective experience and existential intuition in recognizing the presence of God. For Blaga, the experience of the sacred and the encounter with the numinous in human existence provides a profound sense of meaning and transcendence, which suggests the existence of God. In summary, the philosophers mentioned above offer different perspectives on whether we can know that God exists simply by thinking about it. While some argue for rational proofs like the ontological or cosmological arguments, others emphasize the importance of personal experience, intuition, introspection or the recognition of higher realities, but the question of God�s existence remains a deeply complex and multifaceted topic, with different philosophical approaches yielding different conclusions, a complex and deeply personal matter, with differing viewpoints among philosophers and individuals.","PeriodicalId":187162,"journal":{"name":"SWS International Scientific Conferences on ART and HUMANITIES - ISCAH","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SWS International Scientific Conferences on ART and HUMANITIES - ISCAH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscah.2023/s10.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of whether we can know that God exists simply by thinking about it has been explored by various philosophers throughout history. Let�s examine the ideas of Plato, Saint Augustine of Hippo, Saint Anselm, Thomas Aquinas, Rene Descartes, and Lucian Blaga on this topic. Plato�s philosophy centered around the idea of forms or ideal concepts. While he did not explicitly argue for the existence of a monotheistic God, he believed in a transcendent realm of perfect forms that served as the ultimate source of reality. According to Plato, through philosophical contemplation and reason, one could gain knowledge of these forms, including the form of the good, which could be equated with a divine or godlike entity. Saint Augustine of Hippo sought to reconcile faith and reason and believed that rational inquiry could lead to knowledge of God�s existence. He argued that God�s existence could be known through introspection and reflection on one�s own existence. Augustine believed that God�s existence is self-evident and that every thought we have depends on the existence of a supreme, unchanging and eternal being. Saint Anselm proposed the ontological argument for the existence of God. He argued that we can conceive of a being greater than which nothing can be conceived. According to Anselm, if such a being exists in the understanding alone, it could also exist in reality, which is even greater. Therefore, God must exist in reality. Anselm�s argument relies on the idea that the concept of God contains the concept of necessary existence. Thomas Aquinas developed the cosmological argument, which asserts that everything in the universe has a cause, and ultimately there must be an uncaused cause (God) that initiates the chain of causes. Aquinas believed that reason could lead us to knowledge of God�s existence through observation of the natural world and logical deduction. He believed that God�s existence is self-evident and can be understood through natural theology. Rene Descartes known for his phrase �I think, therefore I am,� sought to establish a foundation of knowledge through rational inquiry. While his philosophical project primarily focused on skepticism and the existence of the self, Descartes also argued for the existence of God. He posited that the idea of God, as a perfect and infinite being, could not have originated from himself, a finite and imperfect being. Therefore, he concluded that the idea of God must have been implanted by a higher power, namely God himself. Lucian Blaga, a Romanian philosopher, addressed the problem of God�s existence from a phenomenological perspective. He argued that God�s existence is not a factual truth that can be proven or disproven by rational thought alone. Instead, Blaga emphasized the importance of subjective experience and existential intuition in recognizing the presence of God. For Blaga, the experience of the sacred and the encounter with the numinous in human existence provides a profound sense of meaning and transcendence, which suggests the existence of God. In summary, the philosophers mentioned above offer different perspectives on whether we can know that God exists simply by thinking about it. While some argue for rational proofs like the ontological or cosmological arguments, others emphasize the importance of personal experience, intuition, introspection or the recognition of higher realities, but the question of God�s existence remains a deeply complex and multifaceted topic, with different philosophical approaches yielding different conclusions, a complex and deeply personal matter, with differing viewpoints among philosophers and individuals.
我们能仅仅通过思考就知道神的存在吗?
历史上,不同的哲学家都曾探讨过 "我们能否通过思考就知道上帝的存在 "这一问题。让我们来看看柏拉图、希波的圣奥古斯丁、圣安瑟伦、托马斯-阿奎那、笛卡尔和卢西安-布拉加对这个问题的看法。柏拉图的哲学以形式或理想概念为中心。虽然他没有明确论证一神教上帝的存在,但他相信一个由完美形式构成的超验领域是现实的终极源泉。柏拉图认为,通过哲学沉思和理性,人们可以获得关于这些形式的知识,包括善的形式,而善的形式可以等同于神或神一样的实体。希波的圣奥古斯丁(Saint Augustine of Hippo)试图调和信仰与理性,认为理性的探究可以让人了解神的存在。他认为,上帝的存在可以通过对自身存在的反省和反思来认识。奥古斯丁认为上帝的存在是不言而喻的,我们的每一个思想都取决于一个至高无上、永恒不变的存在。圣安瑟伦提出了上帝存在的本体论论证。他认为,我们可以想象出一个更伟大的存在,没有什么可以比它更伟大。安瑟伦认为,如果这样一种存在仅存在于人们的理解之中,那么它也可能存在于现实之中,而现实则更加伟大。因此,上帝一定存在于现实之中。安瑟伦的论证依赖于这样一个观点,即上帝的概念包含必然存在的概念。托马斯-阿奎那(Thomas Aquinas)提出了宇宙论论证,认为宇宙万物皆有其因,最终必然有一个无因之因(上帝)启动了因果链。阿奎那相信,通过观察自然世界和逻辑演绎,理性可以引导我们认识上帝的存在。他认为上帝的存在是不证自明的,可以通过自然神学来理解。笛卡尔(Rene Descartes)以 "我思故我在"(I think, therefore I am)一词而闻名,他试图通过理性探索建立知识的基础。笛卡尔的哲学课题主要集中在怀疑论和自我的存在上,同时他也论证了上帝的存在。他认为,上帝是一个完美和无限的存在,上帝的观念不可能源于他自己这个有限和不完美的存在。因此,他得出结论,上帝的观念一定是由一种更高的力量,即上帝本身,所植入的。罗马尼亚哲学家卢西安-布拉加(Lucian Blaga)从现象学的角度探讨了上帝存在的问题。他认为,上帝的存在并不是一个仅凭理性思考就能证明或否定的事实真相。相反,布拉加强调主观体验和存在直觉对认识上帝存在的重要性。在布拉加看来,人类生存中的神圣体验和与非凡事物的相遇提供了一种深刻的意义感和超越感,从而暗示了上帝的存在。 总之,上述哲学家对我们能否仅仅通过思考就知道上帝的存在提出了不同的观点。有些人主张理性证明,如本体论或宇宙论论证,有些人则强调个人体验、直觉、内省或对更高现实的认识的重要性,但上帝存在的问题仍然是一个极其复杂和多面的话题,不同的哲学方法会得出不同的结论,是一个复杂和深入个人的问题,哲学家和个人之间的观点也不尽相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信