Ankyloglossia severity in infants: maternal pain, self-efficacy, and functional aspects of breastfeeding

IF 1.4 Q3 PEDIATRICS
C. L. C. Batista, Alex Luiz Pozzobon Pereira
{"title":"Ankyloglossia severity in infants: maternal pain, self-efficacy, and functional aspects of breastfeeding","authors":"C. L. C. Batista, Alex Luiz Pozzobon Pereira","doi":"10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2022203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze functional aspects of breastfeeding, self-efficacy, and pain reported by mothers during breastfeeding, in newborns with severe and mild ankyloglossia. Methods: This is an observational study, carried out with 81 babies with ankyloglossia, assessed by the Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool (severe: scores 0–3; mild: scores 4–6) nested in a cohort carried out at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, Brazil. The functional aspects of breastfeeding were analyzed using the Breastfeeding Observation Form of the United Nations Children's Fund (BOF-UNICEF) and the LATCH Scoring System. Breastfeeding self-efficacy was measured using the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale — Short-Form. Pain indicators were evaluated by the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. The significance level adopted was 5%. Results: Maternal age was 26.7±0.8 years, and 64.2% reported high school education. Most babies were male (67.9%), and the birth weight was 3232±60g. A significant association was detected in the sucking aspect evaluated by the BOF-UNICEF [β=0.22 (95%CI 0.07; 0.73), p-value=0.013]. However, the groups did not differ in the assessment of breastfeeding performed by the LATCH scale. The groups had no differences in the assessment of breastfeeding self-efficacy reported by mothers, and in pain scores. Conclusions: Despite the observation of sucking difficulty in infants with severe ankyloglossia., the quality of breastfeeding in general, maternal pain, and self-efficacy reported by mothers do not differ when compared with infants with mild ankyloglossia. Therefore, the severity of ankyloglossia seems not to affect the breastfeeding indicators.","PeriodicalId":21311,"journal":{"name":"Revista Paulista De Pediatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Paulista De Pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2022203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze functional aspects of breastfeeding, self-efficacy, and pain reported by mothers during breastfeeding, in newborns with severe and mild ankyloglossia. Methods: This is an observational study, carried out with 81 babies with ankyloglossia, assessed by the Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool (severe: scores 0–3; mild: scores 4–6) nested in a cohort carried out at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, Brazil. The functional aspects of breastfeeding were analyzed using the Breastfeeding Observation Form of the United Nations Children's Fund (BOF-UNICEF) and the LATCH Scoring System. Breastfeeding self-efficacy was measured using the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale — Short-Form. Pain indicators were evaluated by the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. The significance level adopted was 5%. Results: Maternal age was 26.7±0.8 years, and 64.2% reported high school education. Most babies were male (67.9%), and the birth weight was 3232±60g. A significant association was detected in the sucking aspect evaluated by the BOF-UNICEF [β=0.22 (95%CI 0.07; 0.73), p-value=0.013]. However, the groups did not differ in the assessment of breastfeeding performed by the LATCH scale. The groups had no differences in the assessment of breastfeeding self-efficacy reported by mothers, and in pain scores. Conclusions: Despite the observation of sucking difficulty in infants with severe ankyloglossia., the quality of breastfeeding in general, maternal pain, and self-efficacy reported by mothers do not differ when compared with infants with mild ankyloglossia. Therefore, the severity of ankyloglossia seems not to affect the breastfeeding indicators.
婴儿口唇强直的严重程度:母亲的疼痛、自我效能感和母乳喂养的功能方面
摘要 目的分析患有重度和轻度强直性舌后裂的新生儿的母乳喂养功能、自我效能以及母亲在母乳喂养过程中报告的疼痛。研究方法这是一项观察性研究,研究对象是巴西圣路易斯马拉尼昂联邦大学大学医院的一个队列中的 81 名患有舌侧畸形的婴儿,他们均通过布里斯托尔舌评估工具进行了评估(重度:0-3 分;轻度:4-6 分)。使用联合国儿童基金会母乳喂养观察表(BOF-UNICEF)和 LATCH 评分系统分析了母乳喂养的功能方面。母乳喂养自我效能感采用母乳喂养自我效能感简易量表进行测量。疼痛指标通过短式麦吉尔疼痛问卷进行评估。采用的显著性水平为 5%。结果产妇年龄为(26.7±0.8)岁,64.2%接受过高中教育。大多数婴儿为男性(67.9%),出生体重为(3232±60)克。根据 BOF-UNICEF 评估,吸吮方面存在明显关联[β=0.22 (95%CI 0.07; 0.73),p 值=0.013]。然而,在使用 LATCH 量表进行母乳喂养评估方面,两组没有差异。在母亲的母乳喂养自我效能评估和疼痛评分方面,两组没有差异。结论尽管观察到患有重度强直性舌后裂的婴儿吸吮困难,但与患有轻度强直性舌后裂的婴儿相比,母乳喂养的总体质量、母亲的疼痛感以及母亲的自我效能感都没有差异。因此,强直性口吃的严重程度似乎不会影响母乳喂养的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Paulista De Pediatria
Revista Paulista De Pediatria Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Paulista de Pediatria publishes original contributions, case reports and review of clinical research with methodological approach in the areas of health and disease of neonates, infants, children and adolescents. The objective is to disseminate research with methodological quality on issues that comprise the health of children and adolescents. All articles are freely available online, via SciELO. Its abbreviated title is Rev. Paul. Pediatr., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信