Innovative Practice of Integrated Socratic and Seminar Teaching Method in Basic Medical Teaching of Nursing Specialty

Hainan Lu, Xiaoling Wang, Qiao Wang, Zhijia Liu
{"title":"Innovative Practice of Integrated Socratic and Seminar Teaching Method in Basic Medical Teaching of Nursing Specialty","authors":"Hainan Lu, Xiaoling Wang, Qiao Wang, Zhijia Liu","doi":"10.61360/bonicetr232015091006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to study the Socratic method of teaching and Seminar teaching method in nursing professional basic medical teaching practice and the effect is discussed. Results: The scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (90.7±5.0 vs. 86.5±3.8; T = 3.1, P = 0.016); The scores of basic theory (78.5±6.4vs.77.5±3.1; t = 2.291, P = 0.048), paper score (92.0±5.0 vs. 80.0±5.0; t = 2.021, P = 0.018) were better than the control group, especially in the topic selection and writing level, the experimental group was significantly higher.","PeriodicalId":221229,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Education and Teaching Research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Education and Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61360/bonicetr232015091006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to study the Socratic method of teaching and Seminar teaching method in nursing professional basic medical teaching practice and the effect is discussed. Results: The scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (90.7±5.0 vs. 86.5±3.8; T = 3.1, P = 0.016); The scores of basic theory (78.5±6.4vs.77.5±3.1; t = 2.291, P = 0.048), paper score (92.0±5.0 vs. 80.0±5.0; t = 2.021, P = 0.018) were better than the control group, especially in the topic selection and writing level, the experimental group was significantly higher.
苏格拉底式和研讨式综合教学法在护理专业基础医学教学中的创新实践
目的:研究苏格拉底教学法和Seminar教学法在护理专业基础医学教学实践中的应用及效果探讨。结果实验组成绩(90.7±5.0vs.86.5±3.8;T=3.1,P=0.016)明显高于对照组;基础理论成绩(78.5±6.4vs.77.5±3.1;t=2.291,P=0.048)、卷面成绩(92.0±5.0 vs. 80.0±5.0;t=2.021,P=0.018)均优于对照组,特别是在选题和写作水平上,实验组明显高于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信