EFL Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and Teaching Practice: Metekel Zone Junior Schools in Focus, Ethiopia

Tadesse Hirpa, Birhnu Simegn, Dawit Amogne, Meseret Getnet
{"title":"EFL Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and Teaching Practice: Metekel Zone Junior Schools in Focus, Ethiopia","authors":"Tadesse Hirpa, Birhnu Simegn, Dawit Amogne, Meseret Getnet","doi":"10.33541/jet.v9i3.5291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this explanatory sequential mixed method study, the researcher attempted to investigate the EFL teachers’ status of CK, PK, PCK, classroom practice and the relationships among these variables. Comprehensive and purposive sampling techniques were used. Quantitative and qualitative data analyses methods were employed in the study. The least knowledge the teachers owned was CK whereas classroom practice was found to be relatively the highest. They had moderate PK in assessing students’ understanding of topics, in drawing up clear classroom rules, creating a friendly atmosphere, and developing a good relationship with students. However, the overall finding revealed that the teachers were not well equipped with PK. They had moderate PCK in designing instructional objectives and context, and in using appropriate examples to explain concepts related to the subject matter whereas their knowledge of students’ understandings and misunderstandings was inadequate. They had low knowledge to diagnose the notions that were problematic for students and to think why these concepts became difficult. There was a strong positive correlation between CK and classroom practice. The correlation between CK and PK was fair whereas there was a weak positive correlation between PK and classroom practice. There was not statistically significant relationship between PCK and classroom practice.","PeriodicalId":201732,"journal":{"name":"JET (Journal of English Teaching)","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JET (Journal of English Teaching)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v9i3.5291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this explanatory sequential mixed method study, the researcher attempted to investigate the EFL teachers’ status of CK, PK, PCK, classroom practice and the relationships among these variables. Comprehensive and purposive sampling techniques were used. Quantitative and qualitative data analyses methods were employed in the study. The least knowledge the teachers owned was CK whereas classroom practice was found to be relatively the highest. They had moderate PK in assessing students’ understanding of topics, in drawing up clear classroom rules, creating a friendly atmosphere, and developing a good relationship with students. However, the overall finding revealed that the teachers were not well equipped with PK. They had moderate PCK in designing instructional objectives and context, and in using appropriate examples to explain concepts related to the subject matter whereas their knowledge of students’ understandings and misunderstandings was inadequate. They had low knowledge to diagnose the notions that were problematic for students and to think why these concepts became difficult. There was a strong positive correlation between CK and classroom practice. The correlation between CK and PK was fair whereas there was a weak positive correlation between PK and classroom practice. There was not statistically significant relationship between PCK and classroom practice.
EFL 教师的教学内容知识(PCK)与教学实践:聚焦埃塞俄比亚梅特克尔区初级学校
在这项解释性顺序混合方法研究中,研究者试图调查 EFL 教师的 CK、PK、PCK 状况、课堂实践以及这些变量之间的关系。研究采用了综合抽样和目的抽样技术。研究采用了定量和定性数据分析方法。研究发现,教师拥有的知识最少的是知识库,而课堂实践相对最多。他们在评估学生对主题的理解、制定明确的课堂规则、营造友好的氛围以及与学生建立良好关系等方面的能力都处于中等水平。然而,总体调查结果显示,教师的 PK 水平不高。他们在设计教学目标和情境,以及使用适当的例子解释与学科有关的概念方面的个人知识水平一般,但对学生的理解和误解的了解不足。他们在诊断学生有问题的概念和思考这些概念为何变得困难方面的知识较少。CK 与课堂实践之间有很强的正相关性。CK 与 PK 之间的相关性一般,而 PK 与课堂练习之间的正相关性较弱。PCK 与课堂实践之间的关系在统计上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信