Utilizing the MRI findings to diagnose acute appendicitis in pregnant women

Zeynep Yildiz, Fuldem Mutlu
{"title":"Utilizing the MRI findings to diagnose acute appendicitis in pregnant women","authors":"Zeynep Yildiz, Fuldem Mutlu","doi":"10.32322/jhsm.1362716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To assess the performance of magnetic resonance ımaging (MRI ) scale for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women and to determine the added diagnostic value of MRI imaging. Methods: In this retrospective study, the data of patients who presented to our hospital emergency department between January 2018 and December 2021, had clinical and laboratory findings consistent with acute appendicitis, and were diagnosed with radiological imaging, were extracted from the hospital automation system and used for statistical analysis. Ultrasound (US) was used as the first-line diagnostic method for pregnant patients, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used as the second-line diagnostic method. The success of US and MRI examinations in diagnosing acute appendicitis was evaluated. In MRI examinations, the mean values of appendix diameter and wall thickness parameters were examined, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of periappendiceal fat tissue intensity increase, T2A lumen hyperintensity, and periappendiceal fluid parameters were evaluated. Additionally, the frequency of acute appendicitis according to trimesters was examined. SPSS v20.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0; Armonk, NY, USA) package program was used for the analysis. Results: When the medical records of 200 patients diagnosed with appandicitis were retrospectively examined, it was determined that there were 13 pregnant cases diagnosed with MRI during this period. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated for parameters including intraluminal T2A hyperintensity, wall thickness, periappendiceal fluid accumulation, and periappendiceal fatty tissue intensity increase. İntraluminal T2A hyperintensity and also periappendiceal fatty tissue intensity increase parameter sensitivity was 100%, however the wall thickness parameter had a sensitivity of 60% and the periappendiceal fluid accumulation parameter had a sensitivity of 80%. the periappendiceal fatty tissue intensity increase parameter had a a specificity of 33.3%, which is the lowest ratio among the other parameters. there was also no significant difference in the frequency of acute appendicitis according to trimesters Conclusion: MRI examination has a high success rate and can be used as the primary diagnostic method for pregnant appandicitis cases. In terms of parameter evaluation, the highest positive predictive value (90.9%) is found by the parameter of intraluminal T2 hyperintensity, and the parameter of periappendiceal fluid collection is found to be in the second place. The success of T2A lumen hyperintensity and periappendiceal fat tissue intensity increase parameters, especially in excluding negative cases, was found to be quite high.","PeriodicalId":176872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine","volume":"11 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1362716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To assess the performance of magnetic resonance ımaging (MRI ) scale for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women and to determine the added diagnostic value of MRI imaging. Methods: In this retrospective study, the data of patients who presented to our hospital emergency department between January 2018 and December 2021, had clinical and laboratory findings consistent with acute appendicitis, and were diagnosed with radiological imaging, were extracted from the hospital automation system and used for statistical analysis. Ultrasound (US) was used as the first-line diagnostic method for pregnant patients, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used as the second-line diagnostic method. The success of US and MRI examinations in diagnosing acute appendicitis was evaluated. In MRI examinations, the mean values of appendix diameter and wall thickness parameters were examined, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of periappendiceal fat tissue intensity increase, T2A lumen hyperintensity, and periappendiceal fluid parameters were evaluated. Additionally, the frequency of acute appendicitis according to trimesters was examined. SPSS v20.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0; Armonk, NY, USA) package program was used for the analysis. Results: When the medical records of 200 patients diagnosed with appandicitis were retrospectively examined, it was determined that there were 13 pregnant cases diagnosed with MRI during this period. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated for parameters including intraluminal T2A hyperintensity, wall thickness, periappendiceal fluid accumulation, and periappendiceal fatty tissue intensity increase. İntraluminal T2A hyperintensity and also periappendiceal fatty tissue intensity increase parameter sensitivity was 100%, however the wall thickness parameter had a sensitivity of 60% and the periappendiceal fluid accumulation parameter had a sensitivity of 80%. the periappendiceal fatty tissue intensity increase parameter had a a specificity of 33.3%, which is the lowest ratio among the other parameters. there was also no significant difference in the frequency of acute appendicitis according to trimesters Conclusion: MRI examination has a high success rate and can be used as the primary diagnostic method for pregnant appandicitis cases. In terms of parameter evaluation, the highest positive predictive value (90.9%) is found by the parameter of intraluminal T2 hyperintensity, and the parameter of periappendiceal fluid collection is found to be in the second place. The success of T2A lumen hyperintensity and periappendiceal fat tissue intensity increase parameters, especially in excluding negative cases, was found to be quite high.
利用磁共振成像结果诊断孕妇急性阑尾炎
目的:评估磁共振成像(MRI)量表在诊断孕妇急性阑尾炎方面的性能,并确定磁共振成像的附加诊断价值。 方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们从医院自动化系统中提取了2018年1月至2021年12月期间在我院急诊科就诊、临床和实验室检查结果与急性阑尾炎相符并经放射成像诊断的患者数据,并将其用于统计分析。怀孕患者的一线诊断方法是超声波(US),二线诊断方法是磁共振成像(MRI)。评估了 US 和 MRI 检查在诊断急性阑尾炎方面的成功率。在磁共振成像检查中,检查了阑尾直径和壁厚参数的平均值,评估了阑尾周围脂肪组织强度增加、T2A管腔高密度和阑尾周围液体参数的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。此外,还研究了不同孕期急性阑尾炎的发病率。分析使用了SPSS v20.0(IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0; Armonk, NY, USA)软件包。 结果回顾性检查了 200 例阑尾炎患者的病历,发现在此期间有 13 例孕妇确诊为 MRI 患者。对包括管腔内 T2A 高密度、管壁厚度、阑尾周围积液和阑尾周围脂肪组织强度增加等参数的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值进行了评估。管腔内 T2A 高密度和阑尾周围脂肪组织强度增加参数的敏感性为 100%,但管壁厚度参数的敏感性为 60%,阑尾周围积液参数的敏感性为 80%,阑尾周围脂肪组织强度增加参数的特异性为 33.3%,是其他参数中特异性最低的:磁共振成像检查的成功率很高,可作为妊娠阑尾炎病例的主要诊断方法。在参数评估方面,腔内 T2 高强度参数的阳性预测值最高(90.9%),阑尾周围积液参数位居第二。T2A 腔内高密度和阑尾周围脂肪组织强度增加参数的成功率相当高,尤其是在排除阴性病例时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信