Differences in C-Reactive Protein Level Based on Clinical Severity and Outcome of COVID-19 Patients at RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang

Isnaniyah Usman, Irvan Medison, Deddy Herman
{"title":"Differences in C-Reactive Protein Level Based on Clinical Severity and Outcome of COVID-19 Patients at RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang","authors":"Isnaniyah Usman, Irvan Medison, Deddy Herman","doi":"10.36497/jri.v43i4.427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inflammatory process in COVID-19 can increase inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin 6 (IL-6). The level of C-reactive protein describes the severity of viral infection. Several studies had been conducted to investigate the link between C-reactive protein level and the severity of COVID-19. The purpose of this study is to identify differences in C-reactive protein levels based on clinical degrees and outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated at RSUP by Dr. M. Jamil Padang.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that analyzed all COVID-19 patients treated at RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang. This study lasted from December 1st, 2021 and June 1st, 2022. The data was analyzed using univariate, bivariate, and confounding analysis. Bivariate analysis explored differences in C-reactive protein levels in clinical severity and patient outcomes for COVID-19. The Kruskal-Wallis test determined the difference between the CRP level and clinical severity, while the Mann-Whitney test determined the difference between the CRP level and length of stay and final hospitalization status. Confounding test was performed using multiple linear regression tests.Results: Majority of participants were women (51.0%) with range of age between 50–59 years (28.0%) and suffered from hypertension (46.0%). Less than half of them had secondary infection (49.0%). Majority of them had a critical clinical severity (75.0%) and length of stay ≤14 days (77.0%) and more than half were deceased (65.0%). C-reactive protein levels were higher in patients with critical clinical degrees (89.00 mg/L) compared to moderate (37.50 mg/L) and severe (23.00 mg/L), C-reactive protein levels in patients with long hospitalization ≤14 days (97.00 mg/L) was higher than >14 days (88.50 mg/L), and C-reactive protein levels were higher in patients who died (93.00 mg/L) than those who survived (68.00 mg/L).Conclusion: C-reactive protein levels differed significantly based on clinical severity, length of stay and end of stay status of COVID-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":168168,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Respirologi Indonesia","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Respirologi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36497/jri.v43i4.427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inflammatory process in COVID-19 can increase inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin 6 (IL-6). The level of C-reactive protein describes the severity of viral infection. Several studies had been conducted to investigate the link between C-reactive protein level and the severity of COVID-19. The purpose of this study is to identify differences in C-reactive protein levels based on clinical degrees and outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated at RSUP by Dr. M. Jamil Padang.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that analyzed all COVID-19 patients treated at RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang. This study lasted from December 1st, 2021 and June 1st, 2022. The data was analyzed using univariate, bivariate, and confounding analysis. Bivariate analysis explored differences in C-reactive protein levels in clinical severity and patient outcomes for COVID-19. The Kruskal-Wallis test determined the difference between the CRP level and clinical severity, while the Mann-Whitney test determined the difference between the CRP level and length of stay and final hospitalization status. Confounding test was performed using multiple linear regression tests.Results: Majority of participants were women (51.0%) with range of age between 50–59 years (28.0%) and suffered from hypertension (46.0%). Less than half of them had secondary infection (49.0%). Majority of them had a critical clinical severity (75.0%) and length of stay ≤14 days (77.0%) and more than half were deceased (65.0%). C-reactive protein levels were higher in patients with critical clinical degrees (89.00 mg/L) compared to moderate (37.50 mg/L) and severe (23.00 mg/L), C-reactive protein levels in patients with long hospitalization ≤14 days (97.00 mg/L) was higher than >14 days (88.50 mg/L), and C-reactive protein levels were higher in patients who died (93.00 mg/L) than those who survived (68.00 mg/L).Conclusion: C-reactive protein levels differed significantly based on clinical severity, length of stay and end of stay status of COVID-19 patients.
基于临床严重程度的 C-Reactive 蛋白水平差异与 RSUP COVID-19 患者的预后 M. Djamil Padang 博士
背景:COVID-19 的炎症过程会增加炎症指标,如 C 反应蛋白 (CRP)、降钙素原 (PCT) 和白细胞介素 6 (IL-6)。C 反应蛋白的水平说明了病毒感染的严重程度。已有多项研究调查了 C 反应蛋白水平与 COVID-19 严重程度之间的联系。本研究的目的是根据M. Jamil Padang博士在RSUP治疗的COVID-19患者的临床程度和结果,确定C反应蛋白水平的差异:这是一项回顾性队列研究,分析了在 M. Djamil Padang 医生的 RSUP 治疗的所有 COVID-19 患者。这项研究从 2021 年 12 月 1 日持续到 2022 年 6 月 1 日。数据采用单变量、双变量和混杂分析法进行分析。双变量分析探讨了COVID-19临床严重程度和患者预后中C反应蛋白水平的差异。Kruskal-Wallis 检验确定了 CRP 水平与临床严重程度之间的差异,而 Mann-Whitney 检验确定了 CRP 水平与住院时间和最终住院状态之间的差异。使用多元线性回归测试对混杂因素进行了检验:大多数参与者为女性(51.0%),年龄在 50-59 岁之间(28.0%),患有高血压(46.0%)。继发感染者不足半数(49.0%)。大多数患者的临床症状严重(75.0%),住院时间少于 14 天(77.0%),半数以上患者已死亡(65.0%)。与中度(37.50 mg/L)和重度(23.00 mg/L)相比,临床程度危重的患者 C 反应蛋白水平更高(89.00 mg/L),住院时间≤14 天的患者 C 反应蛋白水平(97.00 mg/L)高于住院时间大于 14 天的患者(88.50 mg/L),死亡患者 C 反应蛋白水平(93.00 mg/L)高于存活患者(68.00 mg/L):结论:COVID-19患者的C反应蛋白水平因其临床严重程度、住院时间和住院结束状态而存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信