Potential for low-forage diets to maintain milk production in forage-limited situations

Ariana Negreiro, Adam L. Lock
{"title":"Potential for low-forage diets to maintain milk production in forage-limited situations","authors":"Ariana Negreiro,&nbsp;Adam L. Lock","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We determined the effect of feeding diets similar in neutral detergent fiber (NDF), starch, and crude protein (CP) with different amounts of forage on the yields of milk and milk components of mid-lactation dairy cows. Thirty-two Holstein cows (132 ± 68 d in milk) were used in a crossover design with 2 consecutive 28-d periods, with sample and data collection during the final 5 d of each period. Treatment diets were (1) control diet (CON) containing high forage (55.5% diet dry matter [DM]; forage NDF 19.2% diet DM) and no supplemental fatty acids or AA; and (2) low-forage (LF) diet containing low forage (36.6% diet DM; forage NDF 12.7% diet DM), including supplemental fat (1.43% diet DM; 82% C16:0-enriched supplement) and rumen-protected methionine and lysine. Diets were balanced for similar NDF (∼30.2% diet DM), starch (∼26.7% diet DM), and CP (∼16.2% diet DM). There was no effect of treatment on milk yield, milk fat content, or body weight. Compared with CON, LF increased DM intake (30.8 vs. 31.8 kg/d), milk fat yield (1.78 vs. 1.84 kg/d), milk protein yield (1.47 vs. 1.56 kg/d), milk protein content (3.24% vs. 3.41%), energy-corrected milk (48.3 vs. 50.2 kg/d), and body condition score (3.2 vs. 3.3). Our results demonstrate that feeding a low-forage diet supplemented with a C16:0-enriched fatty acid supplement and AA increased DM intake and the yields of milk fat and protein, without changes in body weight. The effect of a low-forage diet without supplemental fatty acids and AA was not tested.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910223001084/pdfft?md5=e2030bbe8274af6118ed42aabec6de7b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910223001084-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910223001084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We determined the effect of feeding diets similar in neutral detergent fiber (NDF), starch, and crude protein (CP) with different amounts of forage on the yields of milk and milk components of mid-lactation dairy cows. Thirty-two Holstein cows (132 ± 68 d in milk) were used in a crossover design with 2 consecutive 28-d periods, with sample and data collection during the final 5 d of each period. Treatment diets were (1) control diet (CON) containing high forage (55.5% diet dry matter [DM]; forage NDF 19.2% diet DM) and no supplemental fatty acids or AA; and (2) low-forage (LF) diet containing low forage (36.6% diet DM; forage NDF 12.7% diet DM), including supplemental fat (1.43% diet DM; 82% C16:0-enriched supplement) and rumen-protected methionine and lysine. Diets were balanced for similar NDF (∼30.2% diet DM), starch (∼26.7% diet DM), and CP (∼16.2% diet DM). There was no effect of treatment on milk yield, milk fat content, or body weight. Compared with CON, LF increased DM intake (30.8 vs. 31.8 kg/d), milk fat yield (1.78 vs. 1.84 kg/d), milk protein yield (1.47 vs. 1.56 kg/d), milk protein content (3.24% vs. 3.41%), energy-corrected milk (48.3 vs. 50.2 kg/d), and body condition score (3.2 vs. 3.3). Our results demonstrate that feeding a low-forage diet supplemented with a C16:0-enriched fatty acid supplement and AA increased DM intake and the yields of milk fat and protein, without changes in body weight. The effect of a low-forage diet without supplemental fatty acids and AA was not tested.

低饲草日粮在饲草有限的情况下保持牛奶产量的潜力
我们测定了饲喂中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、淀粉和粗蛋白(CP)含量相似的日粮与不同量的饲草对泌乳中期奶牛的牛奶产量和牛奶成分的影响。32 头荷斯坦奶牛(产奶期为 132 ± 68 天)采用交叉设计,连续饲喂 2 期,每期 28 天,在每期的最后 5 天采集样品和数据。处理日粮为:(1)对照日粮(CON),含高饲草(55.5% 日粮干物质 [DM];饲草 NDF 19.2% 日粮 DM),不补充脂肪酸或 AA;(2)低饲草日粮(LF),含低饲草(36.6% 日粮 DM;饲草 NDF 12.7% 日粮 DM),包括补充脂肪(1.43% 日粮 DM;82% C16:0 富集补充物)以及瘤胃保护蛋氨酸和赖氨酸。日粮中的 NDF(∼30.2% 日粮 DM)、淀粉(∼26.7% 日粮 DM)和 CP(∼16.2% 日粮 DM)保持平衡。处理对产奶量、乳脂含量和体重没有影响。与CON相比,LF增加了DM摄入量(30.8 vs. 31.8 kg/d)、乳脂产量(1.78 vs. 1.84 kg/d)、乳蛋白产量(1.47 vs. 1.56 kg/d)、乳蛋白含量(3.24% vs. 3.41%)、能量校正奶(48.3 vs. 50.2 kg/d)和体况评分(3.2 vs. 3.3)。我们的研究结果表明,饲喂添加了 C16:0 脂肪酸和 AA 的低饲喂量日粮可增加 DM 的摄入量以及乳脂和蛋白质的产量,而体重不会发生变化。没有测试不添加脂肪酸和 AA 的低贮饲日粮的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信