Assessment of the effects of prepartum anti-inflammatory therapies on type 1/type 2 immunity ratio using a rapid blood test

J. Spring , Q. Huo , E. Jimenez , M. Martinez , P. Zarei , J. Lection , E. Hovingh , J. Lawhead , R.H. Sorto Cruz , A.A. Barragan
{"title":"Assessment of the effects of prepartum anti-inflammatory therapies on type 1/type 2 immunity ratio using a rapid blood test","authors":"J. Spring ,&nbsp;Q. Huo ,&nbsp;E. Jimenez ,&nbsp;M. Martinez ,&nbsp;P. Zarei ,&nbsp;J. Lection ,&nbsp;E. Hovingh ,&nbsp;J. Lawhead ,&nbsp;R.H. Sorto Cruz ,&nbsp;A.A. Barragan","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study was to assess (1) the effects of prepartum administration of anti-inflammatory therapies on type 1/type 2 immunity ratio using a rapid blood test (D2Dx immunity test; Nano Discovery Inc.), and (2) correlations between rapid blood test scores and daily milk yield in Holstein dairy cows. At 14 d before the expected calving date, cows (n = 64) and heifers (n = 23) were blocked by body condition score (optimal = 3.25–3.5; high ≥3.75) and parity (nulliparous, parous), and randomly allocated to one of 3 treatment groups (1) ASA (n = 29) = receive one oral treatment with administration of acetylsalicylic acid (4 boluses; 480 grain/bolus); (2) MEL (n = 31) = receive one oral administration with meloxicam (1 mg/kg of body weight), or (3) PLC (n = 27) = receive one oral treatment with 4 gelatin capsules filled with water. Blood samples were collected weekly starting 1 wk before treatment until 3 wk after calving for assessment of type 1/type 2 immunity ratio using a rapid blood test (i.e., D2Dx immunity test). A higher D2Dx score corresponds to a higher type 1/type 2 ratio. Furthermore, blood samples were collected within 72 h before and after calving by farm personnel. Daily milk yield for the first 60 d in milk (DIM) was collected from on-farm computer records. The data were analyzed using MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc.) as a randomized complete block design. On average enrolled cows received treatment administration 10 d before the actual calving date (standard deviation = 5.10 d). There was a tendency for a treatment by day interaction. Cows treated with ASA had higher type 1/type 2 ratio within 3 d after calving compared with MEL and PLC cows (ASA = 0.065 ± 0.002; MEL = 0.059 ± 0.002; PLC = 0.053 ± 0.002). Similarly, ASA and MEL cows had a higher type 1/type 2 ratio at 7 ± 3 DIM compared with PLC cows (ASA = 0.062 ± 0.002; MEL = 0.064 ± 0.002; PLC = 0.056 ± 0.002). Regardless of treatment, there was an interaction between parity and day. Parous cows had higher type 1/type 2 ratios compared with nulliparous cows at 14 ± 3 d before calving and at 7 ± 3, 14 ± 3, and 21 ± 3 d after calving. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between D2Dx scores at 14 ± 3 DIM and average daily milk yield in the first 60 DIM. These results suggest that prepartum anti-inflammatory therapies may cause an increased shift in type 1 immunity around calving. Similarly, parous cows may have an increased shift in type 1 immunity after calving. Interestingly, higher type 1/type 2 ratios may be associated with higher milk yields in the first 60 DIM. Larger studies are needed to identify associations between the D2Dx immunity test and cow health and performance, as well as to assess the applicability of these types of tests in a conventional farm setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910223001230/pdfft?md5=da7d2f9a5a008b9032e74b0650b2dfbe&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910223001230-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910223001230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess (1) the effects of prepartum administration of anti-inflammatory therapies on type 1/type 2 immunity ratio using a rapid blood test (D2Dx immunity test; Nano Discovery Inc.), and (2) correlations between rapid blood test scores and daily milk yield in Holstein dairy cows. At 14 d before the expected calving date, cows (n = 64) and heifers (n = 23) were blocked by body condition score (optimal = 3.25–3.5; high ≥3.75) and parity (nulliparous, parous), and randomly allocated to one of 3 treatment groups (1) ASA (n = 29) = receive one oral treatment with administration of acetylsalicylic acid (4 boluses; 480 grain/bolus); (2) MEL (n = 31) = receive one oral administration with meloxicam (1 mg/kg of body weight), or (3) PLC (n = 27) = receive one oral treatment with 4 gelatin capsules filled with water. Blood samples were collected weekly starting 1 wk before treatment until 3 wk after calving for assessment of type 1/type 2 immunity ratio using a rapid blood test (i.e., D2Dx immunity test). A higher D2Dx score corresponds to a higher type 1/type 2 ratio. Furthermore, blood samples were collected within 72 h before and after calving by farm personnel. Daily milk yield for the first 60 d in milk (DIM) was collected from on-farm computer records. The data were analyzed using MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc.) as a randomized complete block design. On average enrolled cows received treatment administration 10 d before the actual calving date (standard deviation = 5.10 d). There was a tendency for a treatment by day interaction. Cows treated with ASA had higher type 1/type 2 ratio within 3 d after calving compared with MEL and PLC cows (ASA = 0.065 ± 0.002; MEL = 0.059 ± 0.002; PLC = 0.053 ± 0.002). Similarly, ASA and MEL cows had a higher type 1/type 2 ratio at 7 ± 3 DIM compared with PLC cows (ASA = 0.062 ± 0.002; MEL = 0.064 ± 0.002; PLC = 0.056 ± 0.002). Regardless of treatment, there was an interaction between parity and day. Parous cows had higher type 1/type 2 ratios compared with nulliparous cows at 14 ± 3 d before calving and at 7 ± 3, 14 ± 3, and 21 ± 3 d after calving. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between D2Dx scores at 14 ± 3 DIM and average daily milk yield in the first 60 DIM. These results suggest that prepartum anti-inflammatory therapies may cause an increased shift in type 1 immunity around calving. Similarly, parous cows may have an increased shift in type 1 immunity after calving. Interestingly, higher type 1/type 2 ratios may be associated with higher milk yields in the first 60 DIM. Larger studies are needed to identify associations between the D2Dx immunity test and cow health and performance, as well as to assess the applicability of these types of tests in a conventional farm setting.

使用快速血液检测法评估产前抗炎疗法对 1 型/2 型免疫比率的影响
本研究的目的是评估:(1) 使用快速血液测试(D2Dx 免疫测试;Nano Discovery Inc.在预产期前 14 d,将奶牛(n = 64)和母牛(n = 23)按体况评分(最佳 = 3.25-3.5;高≥3.75)和胎次(无胎、有胎),并随机分配到 3 个治疗组中的一个:(1)ASA(n = 29)= 接受一次口服乙酰水杨酸治疗(4 次;480 粒/次);(2)MEL(n = 31)= 接受一次口服美洛昔康治疗(1 毫克/千克体重);或(3)PLC(n = 27)= 接受一次口服 4 粒装满水的明胶胶囊治疗。从治疗前 1 周开始到产犊后 3 周,每周采集血液样本,使用快速血液检测(即 D2Dx 免疫检测)评估 1 型/2 型免疫比率。D2Dx 分数越高,1 型/2 型免疫比率越高。此外,牧场工作人员还在产犊前后 72 小时内采集血液样本。头 60 天的日产奶量(DIM)由牧场电脑记录收集。数据采用 SAS(SAS Institute Inc.)参试奶牛平均在实际产犊日期前 10 天接受治疗(标准偏差 = 5.10 天)。不同天数的处理有交互作用的趋势。与 MEL 和 PLC 相比,接受 ASA 治疗的奶牛在产犊后 3 d 内的 1 型/2 型比率更高(ASA = 0.065 ± 0.002;MEL = 0.059 ± 0.002;PLC = 0.053 ± 0.002)。同样,与 PLC 奶牛相比,ASA 和 MEL 奶牛在 7 ± 3 DIM 时的 1 型/2 型比率更高(ASA = 0.062 ± 0.002;MEL = 0.064 ± 0.002;PLC = 0.056 ± 0.002)。无论哪种处理方法,奇数和日数之间都存在交互作用。在产犊前 14 ± 3 d、产犊后 7 ± 3 d、14 ± 3 d 和 21 ± 3 d,奇数母牛的 1 型/2 型比率高于偶数母牛。此外,产后 14 ± 3 d 的 D2Dx 评分与产后 60 d 的平均日产奶量呈正相关。这些结果表明,产前抗炎疗法可能会导致产犊前后 1 型免疫力的转移增加。同样,parous 奶牛在产犊后1型免疫力的转变也会增加。有趣的是,较高的 1 型/2 型比率可能与产后 60 天内较高的产奶量有关。需要进行更大规模的研究,以确定 D2Dx 免疫测试与奶牛健康和性能之间的关联,并评估这类测试在传统牧场环境中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信