Efficacy of the jawbone defect elimination

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
G. Poryadin, DA Eremin, N. Khelminskaya, V. Kravets, IV Zhitareva, AV Posadskaya, NM Krasnov, PA Shen, MA Gureshidze
{"title":"Efficacy of the jawbone defect elimination","authors":"G. Poryadin, DA Eremin, N. Khelminskaya, V. Kravets, IV Zhitareva, AV Posadskaya, NM Krasnov, PA Shen, MA Gureshidze","doi":"10.24075/brsmu.2023.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The regenerative medicine methods are being actively developed both in Russia and abroad due to relevance of this direction, especially in the field of the jaw osteoplasty. Autologous, allogeneic and xenoplastic materials, as well as the calcium phosphate ceramics synthetic preparations are conventionally used to normalize and stimulate osteogenesis, however, the treatment outcomes are not always unequivocal. The study was aimed to substantiate the use of the biocomplex consisting of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and xenoplastic material to improve the jawbone osteogenesis efficacy. The study involved 136 patients (105 females and 31 males aged 21–67) divided into four groups based on the method of bone defect restoration. In group 1, no osteoplastic material was used; in group 2, osteoplasty involved the use of the PRGF fibrin gel; in group 3, the Osteobiol Gen-Os material was used; in group 4, osteoplasty involved using the combination of the Osteobiol Gen-Os material and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF). Computed tomography and digital densitometry were performed before surgery and 3, 6, 12 months after it to assess the dynamics of osteogenesis. A year later restoration of the lost bone tissue volume was reported in 100% of patients in group 4, 70.27% of patients in group 3, 43.47% of patients in group 2, 37.5% of patients in group 1; Fisher's exact test revealed significant differences in the osteoplasty outcomes in groups 3 and 4 (p = 0.00002). There were significant differences in bone density between patients of groups 1 and 2 twelve months after surgery (p = 0.044), between patient of groups 3 and 4 three (p = 0.004), six (p = 0.0001) and 12 (p = 0.0001) months after surgery. The findings show that the method proposed is effective.","PeriodicalId":9344,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Russian State Medical University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Russian State Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2023.044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The regenerative medicine methods are being actively developed both in Russia and abroad due to relevance of this direction, especially in the field of the jaw osteoplasty. Autologous, allogeneic and xenoplastic materials, as well as the calcium phosphate ceramics synthetic preparations are conventionally used to normalize and stimulate osteogenesis, however, the treatment outcomes are not always unequivocal. The study was aimed to substantiate the use of the biocomplex consisting of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and xenoplastic material to improve the jawbone osteogenesis efficacy. The study involved 136 patients (105 females and 31 males aged 21–67) divided into four groups based on the method of bone defect restoration. In group 1, no osteoplastic material was used; in group 2, osteoplasty involved the use of the PRGF fibrin gel; in group 3, the Osteobiol Gen-Os material was used; in group 4, osteoplasty involved using the combination of the Osteobiol Gen-Os material and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF). Computed tomography and digital densitometry were performed before surgery and 3, 6, 12 months after it to assess the dynamics of osteogenesis. A year later restoration of the lost bone tissue volume was reported in 100% of patients in group 4, 70.27% of patients in group 3, 43.47% of patients in group 2, 37.5% of patients in group 1; Fisher's exact test revealed significant differences in the osteoplasty outcomes in groups 3 and 4 (p = 0.00002). There were significant differences in bone density between patients of groups 1 and 2 twelve months after surgery (p = 0.044), between patient of groups 3 and 4 three (p = 0.004), six (p = 0.0001) and 12 (p = 0.0001) months after surgery. The findings show that the method proposed is effective.
消除颌骨缺陷的功效
由于再生医学的重要性,俄罗斯和国外都在积极发展再生医学方法,尤其是在颌骨整形领域。自体、异体和异种材料以及磷酸钙陶瓷合成制剂通常被用于正常化和刺激骨生成,但治疗效果并不总是明确的。这项研究旨在证实由富含生长因子的血浆(PRGF)和异种材料组成的生物复合物对改善颌骨成骨疗效的作用。研究根据骨缺损修复方法将 136 名患者(女 105 人,男 31 人,年龄 21-67 岁)分为四组。第一组不使用骨整形材料;第二组使用富含生长因子的纤维蛋白凝胶进行骨整形;第三组使用Osteobiol Gen-Os材料;第四组结合使用Osteobiol Gen-Os材料和富含生长因子的血浆(PRGF)进行骨整形。手术前和手术后 3、6、12 个月分别进行了计算机断层扫描和数字密度测量,以评估骨生成的动态。一年后,第 4 组 100%的患者、第 3 组 70.27%的患者、第 2 组 43.47%的患者、第 1 组 37.5%的患者恢复了失去的骨组织量;费雪精确检验显示,第 3 组和第 4 组的骨成形术结果存在显著差异(P = 0.00002)。第 1 组和第 2 组患者术后 12 个月的骨密度有明显差异(p = 0.044),第 3 组和第 4 组患者术后 3 个月(p = 0.004)、6 个月(p = 0.0001)和 12 个月(p = 0.0001)的骨密度有明显差异。研究结果表明,所建议的方法是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Russian State Medical University
Bulletin of Russian State Medical University MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Russian State Medical University (Bulletin of RSMU, ISSN Print 2500–1094, ISSN Online 2542–1204) is a peer-reviewed medical journal of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Moscow, Russia). The original language of the journal is Russian (Vestnik Rossiyskogo Gosudarstvennogo Meditsinskogo Universiteta, Vestnik RGMU, ISSN Print 2070–7320, ISSN Online 2070–7339). Founded in 1994, it is issued once every two months publishing articles on clinical medicine and medical and biological sciences, first of all oncology, neurobiology, allergy and immunology, medical genetics, medical microbiology and infectious diseases. Every issue is thematic. Deadlines for manuscript submission are announced in advance. The number of publications on topics in spite of the issue topic is limited. The journal accepts only original articles submitted by their authors, including articles that present methods and techniques, clinical cases and opinions. Authors must guarantee that their work has not been previously published elsewhere in whole or in part and in other languages and is not under consideration by another scientific journal. The journal publishes only one review per issue; the review is ordered by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信