Proximate composition and sensory acceptability of cowpea-based pudding produced from cowpea cultivated using different weed control methods

E. Oke, B. A. Hammod, A. Adeola, O. A. Ojo, S. Omoniyi
{"title":"Proximate composition and sensory acceptability of cowpea-based pudding produced from cowpea cultivated using different weed control methods","authors":"E. Oke, B. A. Hammod, A. Adeola, O. A. Ojo, S. Omoniyi","doi":"10.2478/ausal-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study evaluates the effect of different weed control methods on the proximate composition and sensory properties of cowpea-based pudding produced from cowpea flour. Cowpea seeds of Ife Brown variety with three different treatments [(supplementary hoe weeding at 6 weeks after sowing, two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 weeks after sowing, and three hoe weeding at 3, 6, and 9 weeks after sowing (WAS)] were processed into flour samples and analysed for physicochemical properties using standard methods. The puddings were prepared from cowpea flour and were subjected to proximate composition, colour properties as well as sensory qualities using standard methods. The pH, total titratable acidity, water absorption capacity and amylose of cowpea flour were 4.85–5.10, 0.02%–0.05%, 276.00%–287.09%, and 22.04%–24.60% respectively. The ranges of values for moisture content, crude fat, total ash, crude fibre, crude protein, and total carbohydrate of cowpea based pudding were 74.26%–76.15%, 0.63%–0.71%, 0.75%–0.94%, 0.66%–0.75%, 16.70%–17.83%, and 5.11%–5.55% respectively. The colour properties of cowpea-based pudding were significantly affected (p < 0.05) by each treatment. However, cowpea-based pudding prepared from treatment of supplementary hoe weeding at 6 weeks after sowing and three hoe weeding at 3, 6, and 9 weeks after were preferred most by the panelist.","PeriodicalId":7180,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Alimentaria","volume":"5 1","pages":"49 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Alimentaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausal-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the effect of different weed control methods on the proximate composition and sensory properties of cowpea-based pudding produced from cowpea flour. Cowpea seeds of Ife Brown variety with three different treatments [(supplementary hoe weeding at 6 weeks after sowing, two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 weeks after sowing, and three hoe weeding at 3, 6, and 9 weeks after sowing (WAS)] were processed into flour samples and analysed for physicochemical properties using standard methods. The puddings were prepared from cowpea flour and were subjected to proximate composition, colour properties as well as sensory qualities using standard methods. The pH, total titratable acidity, water absorption capacity and amylose of cowpea flour were 4.85–5.10, 0.02%–0.05%, 276.00%–287.09%, and 22.04%–24.60% respectively. The ranges of values for moisture content, crude fat, total ash, crude fibre, crude protein, and total carbohydrate of cowpea based pudding were 74.26%–76.15%, 0.63%–0.71%, 0.75%–0.94%, 0.66%–0.75%, 16.70%–17.83%, and 5.11%–5.55% respectively. The colour properties of cowpea-based pudding were significantly affected (p < 0.05) by each treatment. However, cowpea-based pudding prepared from treatment of supplementary hoe weeding at 6 weeks after sowing and three hoe weeding at 3, 6, and 9 weeks after were preferred most by the panelist.
用不同除草方法种植的豇豆制成的豇豆布丁的近似物成分和感官可接受性
摘要 本研究评估了不同杂草控制方法对用豇豆粉制作的豇豆布丁的近似成分和感官特性的影响。采用三种不同的处理方法[(播种后 6 周进行辅助锄草,播种后 3 周和 6 周进行两次锄草,播种后 3 周、6 周和 9 周(WAS)进行三次锄草)]将伊费布朗品种的豇豆种子加工成面粉样品,并采用标准方法分析其理化性质。用豇豆面粉制备布丁,并采用标准方法检测其近似成分、颜色特性和感官质量。豇豆粉的 pH 值、总滴定酸度、吸水能力和直链淀粉分别为 4.85-5.10、0.02%-0.05%、276.00%-287.09% 和 22.04%-24.60%。豇豆布丁的水分含量、粗脂肪、总灰分、粗纤维、粗蛋白和总碳水化合物的数值范围分别为 74.26%-76.15%、0.63%-0.71%、0.75%-0.94%、0.66%-0.75%、16.70%-17.83% 和 5.11%-5.55%。各处理对豇豆布丁的颜色特性均有显著影响(p < 0.05)。然而,小组成员最喜欢在播种后 6 周进行辅助锄草和在播种后 3、6 和 9 周进行三次锄草所制备的豇豆布丁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信