Stress and coping strategy among coaching and non-coaching students in Kota: A comparative study

B. S. Shekhawat, Deepika Meena, Sandhya Yadav, Vikas Dhaka, K. Vignesh
{"title":"Stress and coping strategy among coaching and non-coaching students in Kota: A comparative study","authors":"B. S. Shekhawat, Deepika Meena, Sandhya Yadav, Vikas Dhaka, K. Vignesh","doi":"10.4103/ipj.ipj_203_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: About 1.5 lakh students study in over 100 coaching centers in Kota. There is a highly competitive environment, and students often land up in stress and even suicide. So, the estimation of the magnitude of this problem and timely intervention can be of great value to students. Aim: This study aimed to assess and compare stress and coping strategies used by coaching and non-coaching students studying in Kota. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 90 coaching and 90 non-coaching students fulfilling inclusion criteria that were specifically laid down for the study. A semi-structured specially designed pro forma, Scale of Academic Stress (SAS), and Coping Strategies Scale (CSS)-Hindi version were used. Appropriate statistical methods were then used to classify, tabulate, and analyze the collected data. Results: In this study, it was found that of all coaching students, 44.45% were suffering from high levels of academic stress, 34.44% suffered from average and 21.11% reported suffering from low levels of academic stress. Likewise, among non-coaching students, 70% were suffering from low academic stress, 26.67% from average, and 3.33% from high levels of academic stress. It was also evident that the majority of both coaching and non-coaching students used a low level of active coping strategy (cognitive approach, behavioral approach, and cognitive behavioral approach) and a high level of avoidance coping strategy (cognitive avoidance and behavioral avoidance). Conclusion: There is a significantly high prevalence of stress among coaching students as compared to non-coaching students. Stress levels of greater severity were found to be more prevalent in female students, 12th-class students, those belonging to urban and middle-class backgrounds, and those whose stream was chosen by their parents. Both coaching and non-coaching students used the same type of coping strategies to cope with stress.","PeriodicalId":13534,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_203_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: About 1.5 lakh students study in over 100 coaching centers in Kota. There is a highly competitive environment, and students often land up in stress and even suicide. So, the estimation of the magnitude of this problem and timely intervention can be of great value to students. Aim: This study aimed to assess and compare stress and coping strategies used by coaching and non-coaching students studying in Kota. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 90 coaching and 90 non-coaching students fulfilling inclusion criteria that were specifically laid down for the study. A semi-structured specially designed pro forma, Scale of Academic Stress (SAS), and Coping Strategies Scale (CSS)-Hindi version were used. Appropriate statistical methods were then used to classify, tabulate, and analyze the collected data. Results: In this study, it was found that of all coaching students, 44.45% were suffering from high levels of academic stress, 34.44% suffered from average and 21.11% reported suffering from low levels of academic stress. Likewise, among non-coaching students, 70% were suffering from low academic stress, 26.67% from average, and 3.33% from high levels of academic stress. It was also evident that the majority of both coaching and non-coaching students used a low level of active coping strategy (cognitive approach, behavioral approach, and cognitive behavioral approach) and a high level of avoidance coping strategy (cognitive avoidance and behavioral avoidance). Conclusion: There is a significantly high prevalence of stress among coaching students as compared to non-coaching students. Stress levels of greater severity were found to be more prevalent in female students, 12th-class students, those belonging to urban and middle-class backgrounds, and those whose stream was chosen by their parents. Both coaching and non-coaching students used the same type of coping strategies to cope with stress.
科塔市教练学生和非教练学生的压力与应对策略:比较研究
背景:约有 150 万名学生在哥打的 100 多个辅导中心学习。这里竞争激烈,学生们经常会感到压力过大,甚至自杀。因此,估计这一问题的严重程度并及时采取干预措施对学生而言具有重要价值。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较在哥打就读的辅导班学生和非辅导班学生的压力和应对策略。材料和方法:这项横断面研究包括 90 名教练学生和 90 名非教练学生,他们均符合研究特别制定的纳入标准。研究采用了专门设计的半结构化表格、学业压力量表(SAS)和应对策略量表(CSS)--印地语版。然后使用适当的统计方法对收集到的数据进行分类、制表和分析。研究结果研究发现,在所有辅导学生中,44.45% 的学生学习压力较大,34.44% 的学生学习压力一般,21.11% 的学生学习压力较小。同样,在非辅导学生中,70%的学生学业压力较小,26.67%的学生学业压力一般,3.33%的学生学业压力较大。此外,大部分教练学生和非教练学生都采用了低水平的积极应对策略(认知方法、行为方法和认知行为方法)和高水平的回避应对策略(认知回避和行为回避)。结论与非教练专业学生相比,教练专业学生的压力发生率明显较高。在女生、十二年级学生、城市和中产阶级背景的学生以及由父母选择的学生中,压力的严重程度更高。教练班学生和非教练班学生都使用相同类型的应对策略来应对压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信