Beyond working hours: the association between long working hours, the use of work-related communication devices outside regular working hours, and anxiety symptoms

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shinhyeong Kim, Seunghon Ham, S. Kang, Won-Jun Choi, Wanhyung Lee
{"title":"Beyond working hours: the association between long working hours, the use of work-related communication devices outside regular working hours, and anxiety symptoms","authors":"Shinhyeong Kim, Seunghon Ham, S. Kang, Won-Jun Choi, Wanhyung Lee","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiad004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The present study aims to identify and compare the associations between long working hours and use of work-related communication devices outside regular working hours on anxiety symptoms, thereby providing insight into redefining working hours. Methods: Based on the cross-sectional data from the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS), specifically the responses from 46,055 workers, the use of work-related communication devices outside of regular working hours, long working hours, and anxiety symptoms were assessed. To investigate the associations between using work-related communication devices outside regular working hours or long working hours on anxiety symptoms, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multiple logistic regression models. Results: Among 46,055 participants, 25,659 (55.7%) used work-related communication devices outside working hours, 8,145 (17.7%) worked long hours, and 2,664 (5.8%) experienced anxiety symptoms. Compared to the reference group, those who used work-related communication devices outside regular working hours without working long hours, had higher OR of anxiety symptoms (OR:2.18, 95% CI:1.97-2.41) than those who worked long hours without using work-related communication devices during off-hours (OR:1.32, 95% CI:1.09-1.59). Furthermore, the group that both worked long hours and used work-related communication devices outside working hours exhibited the highest OR of anxiety symptoms (OR:2.57, 95% CI:2.24-2.97). Conclusions: Using work-related communication devices outside regular working hours is associated with a higher risk of anxiety symptoms compared to long working hours. This result suggests that using work-related devices outside regular working hours, in addition to regular work time, should be considered when redefining working hours.","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiad004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The present study aims to identify and compare the associations between long working hours and use of work-related communication devices outside regular working hours on anxiety symptoms, thereby providing insight into redefining working hours. Methods: Based on the cross-sectional data from the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS), specifically the responses from 46,055 workers, the use of work-related communication devices outside of regular working hours, long working hours, and anxiety symptoms were assessed. To investigate the associations between using work-related communication devices outside regular working hours or long working hours on anxiety symptoms, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multiple logistic regression models. Results: Among 46,055 participants, 25,659 (55.7%) used work-related communication devices outside working hours, 8,145 (17.7%) worked long hours, and 2,664 (5.8%) experienced anxiety symptoms. Compared to the reference group, those who used work-related communication devices outside regular working hours without working long hours, had higher OR of anxiety symptoms (OR:2.18, 95% CI:1.97-2.41) than those who worked long hours without using work-related communication devices during off-hours (OR:1.32, 95% CI:1.09-1.59). Furthermore, the group that both worked long hours and used work-related communication devices outside working hours exhibited the highest OR of anxiety symptoms (OR:2.57, 95% CI:2.24-2.97). Conclusions: Using work-related communication devices outside regular working hours is associated with a higher risk of anxiety symptoms compared to long working hours. This result suggests that using work-related devices outside regular working hours, in addition to regular work time, should be considered when redefining working hours.
工作时间之外:长时间工作、在正常工作时间之外使用与工作有关的通讯设备与焦虑症状之间的联系
研究目的本研究旨在确定和比较长时间工作与在正常工作时间之外使用与工作有关的通讯设备对焦虑症状的影响,从而为重新定义工作时间提供启示。 研究方法根据第六次韩国工作条件调查(KWCS)的横断面数据,特别是 46,055 名工人的回答,对在正常工作时间之外使用与工作相关的通讯设备、长时间工作和焦虑症状进行了评估。为了研究在正常工作时间之外使用工作相关通讯设备或长时间工作与焦虑症状之间的关系,研究人员使用多元逻辑回归模型计算了几率比(OR)和 95% 的置信区间(CI)。 结果显示在 46,055 名参与者中,25,659 人(55.7%)在工作时间以外使用与工作有关的通讯设备,8,145 人(17.7%)长时间工作,2,664 人(5.8%)出现焦虑症状。与参照组相比,在正常工作时间以外使用与工作有关的通讯设备而没有长时间工作的人,其焦虑症状的 OR 值(OR:2.18,95% CI:1.97-2.41)高于长时间工作而没有在非工作时间使用与工作有关的通讯设备的人的 OR 值(OR:1.32,95% CI:1.09-1.59)。此外,既长时间工作又在非工作时间使用与工作有关的通讯设备的人群的焦虑症状 OR 值最高(OR:2.57,95% CI:2.24-2.97)。 结论与长时间工作相比,在正常工作时间之外使用与工作相关的通讯设备与更高的焦虑症状风险相关。这一结果表明,在重新定义工作时间时,除了正常工作时间外,还应考虑在正常工作时间外使用与工作相关的设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信