Rereading and the Impact on Practice

Mary Ann Harlan
{"title":"Rereading and the Impact on Practice","authors":"Mary Ann Harlan","doi":"10.29173/iasl8734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“I read Little House on the Prairie when I was a child and it didn’t make me racist”,“the kids love Indian in the Cupboard”, “it is our history we should include it and not censor”.These are all sentiments expressed in librarian groups. How much of this sentiment is based on ourown nostalgia for the books of our youth? If we were to engage in rereading these books that are ofthe childhood canon would we be so certain that we should engage our youth in experiencing thesetitles? Would we be defensive of arguments that these books need to be carefully curated andintroduced to students? Or not introduced at all? Censorship and the recent attempts in the UnitedStates as a backlash to diversity, equity and inclusion practices tend toward simple solutions ofcomplex conversations. Rereading childhood favorites may complicate the answers and bringnuance to a complex conversation. This paper examines one person's attempt to reckon with whatthe books of her youth taught her, while also opening discussion with practitioners about the impactof rereading on their own practice.","PeriodicalId":503765,"journal":{"name":"IASL Annual Conference Proceedings","volume":"25 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IASL Annual Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/iasl8734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“I read Little House on the Prairie when I was a child and it didn’t make me racist”,“the kids love Indian in the Cupboard”, “it is our history we should include it and not censor”.These are all sentiments expressed in librarian groups. How much of this sentiment is based on ourown nostalgia for the books of our youth? If we were to engage in rereading these books that are ofthe childhood canon would we be so certain that we should engage our youth in experiencing thesetitles? Would we be defensive of arguments that these books need to be carefully curated andintroduced to students? Or not introduced at all? Censorship and the recent attempts in the UnitedStates as a backlash to diversity, equity and inclusion practices tend toward simple solutions ofcomplex conversations. Rereading childhood favorites may complicate the answers and bringnuance to a complex conversation. This paper examines one person's attempt to reckon with whatthe books of her youth taught her, while also opening discussion with practitioners about the impactof rereading on their own practice.
重读及其对实践的影响
"我小时候读过《草原小屋》,它并没有让我成为种族主义者","孩子们喜欢《柜中的印第安人》","这是我们的历史,我们应该把它包括进来,而不是审查"。这些情绪有多少是基于我们对年轻时书籍的怀念?如果我们参与重读这些属于童年经典的书籍,我们是否会如此确定我们应该让我们的年轻人参与体验这些字幕?我们是否会为这些书需要精心策划并介绍给学生的论点辩护?或者根本不介绍?审查制度以及最近在美国作为对多元化、公平和包容做法的反弹而进行的尝试,都倾向于用简单的方法来解决复杂的对话。重读童年的最爱可能会使答案复杂化,并给复杂的对话带来启示。本文探讨了一个人试图重新认识她年轻时读过的书教会她的东西的过程,同时也与实践者就重读对他们自身实践的影响展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信