The Asymmetric Effect of Government Spending in the United States

Jingyi Xu, Siyuan Wu
{"title":"The Asymmetric Effect of Government Spending in the United States","authors":"Jingyi Xu, Siyuan Wu","doi":"10.54097/ajmss.v5i1.13936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we test for the presence of asymmetric effects of government spending on output and employment rate using U.S. postwar states panel data. We estimate two “endogenous” asymmetry: (i) whether negative and positive government spending change has different multiplier impact on real output and employment; (ii) whether big or small change has different effects. Our empirical results show there are asymmetric effects in terms of positive and negative government spending, but the asymmetric effect of positive and negative government spending can vary for different dependent variables and there is no significant asymmetric effect on employment. For the asymmetry of big and small government spending, we observe the same asymmetric property for output and employment. In both cases, the differences of the effect of big and small change are non-significant. Our main results are robust to intersection of “endogenous” factors effects, alternative specification (or other additional controls) and longer change interval, but asymmetric effect might differ among different production sectors.","PeriodicalId":503570,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences","volume":"37 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54097/ajmss.v5i1.13936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we test for the presence of asymmetric effects of government spending on output and employment rate using U.S. postwar states panel data. We estimate two “endogenous” asymmetry: (i) whether negative and positive government spending change has different multiplier impact on real output and employment; (ii) whether big or small change has different effects. Our empirical results show there are asymmetric effects in terms of positive and negative government spending, but the asymmetric effect of positive and negative government spending can vary for different dependent variables and there is no significant asymmetric effect on employment. For the asymmetry of big and small government spending, we observe the same asymmetric property for output and employment. In both cases, the differences of the effect of big and small change are non-significant. Our main results are robust to intersection of “endogenous” factors effects, alternative specification (or other additional controls) and longer change interval, but asymmetric effect might differ among different production sectors.
美国政府支出的不对称效应
本文利用美国战后各州的面板数据,检验政府支出对产出和就业率是否存在非对称效应。我们估计了两个 "内生 "非对称性:(i) 政府支出的负向变化和正向变化对实际产出和就业的乘数影响是否不同;(ii) 大变化和小变化的影响是否不同。我们的实证结果表明,政府支出的正负变化存在非对称效应,但政府支出正负变化的非对称效应会因因变量的不同而不同,对就业的非对称效应并不显著。对于政府支出大小的非对称性,我们观察到产出和就业具有相同的非对称性。在这两种情况下,大小变化的影响差异都不显著。我们的主要结果对 "内生 "因素效应的交叉、替代规格(或其他额外控制)和更长的变化间隔都是稳健的,但非对称效应在不同生产部门之间可能有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信