NON DESCENT VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS TOTAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Rajanna. S.P, Rekha. N, Nidhi. B. R, Dwarakanath L
{"title":"NON DESCENT VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS TOTAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY","authors":"Rajanna. S.P, Rekha. N, Nidhi. B. R, Dwarakanath L","doi":"10.36106/paripex/9300681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the most common procedures performed by the gynecologist all over the world including India is Hysterectomy. It is one of the most common elective surgeries in hysterectomy as operative modality. Factors influencing route of hysterectomy include accessibility and size of uterus, extent of adnexal pathology, surgeon training and experience. There are different routes of removal of uterus which is being used with abdominal hysterectomy is no doubt more popular route than vaginal route. An advance in anaesthesia, availability of transfusion services and antibiotics has made hysterectomy becoming the most common procedure in nonpregnancy related major surgical procedures. Many literature supports that vaginal hysterectomy is the cost effective and safe procedure for the removal of uterus also most regularly abdominal route is chosen. In this new era of minimally invasive surgery, a resurgence of interest and importance of VH for non-descent indications i.e. non-decent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH) as the scar less hysterectomy has occurred as has many benefits over abdominal hysterectomy such as lesser post-operative morbidity, cosmetic advantages, better and rapid recovery. The objectives of the study was to compare and assess factors like operative duration of surgery, intra operative and post-operative complications, intra operative blood loss, postoperative requirement of analgesia , post-operative ambulating time and duration of post-operative hospital stay and to put forward best route of hysterectomy in non- descent cases. Compared to all other routes vaginal hysterectomy yields better outcome with less complications. The study was done on 50 cases fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly segregated in two groups- abdominal hysterectomy and NDVH (non-decent vaginal hysterectomy). Intra operative blood loss, Operative time and post-operative morbidity and hospital stay were less in NDVH groups. Nondecent vaginal hysterectomy is a better substitute to abdominal hysterectomy in cases with benign disorders of the uterus, with good mobility and adequate vaginal access.","PeriodicalId":19910,"journal":{"name":"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/9300681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the most common procedures performed by the gynecologist all over the world including India is Hysterectomy. It is one of the most common elective surgeries in hysterectomy as operative modality. Factors influencing route of hysterectomy include accessibility and size of uterus, extent of adnexal pathology, surgeon training and experience. There are different routes of removal of uterus which is being used with abdominal hysterectomy is no doubt more popular route than vaginal route. An advance in anaesthesia, availability of transfusion services and antibiotics has made hysterectomy becoming the most common procedure in nonpregnancy related major surgical procedures. Many literature supports that vaginal hysterectomy is the cost effective and safe procedure for the removal of uterus also most regularly abdominal route is chosen. In this new era of minimally invasive surgery, a resurgence of interest and importance of VH for non-descent indications i.e. non-decent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH) as the scar less hysterectomy has occurred as has many benefits over abdominal hysterectomy such as lesser post-operative morbidity, cosmetic advantages, better and rapid recovery. The objectives of the study was to compare and assess factors like operative duration of surgery, intra operative and post-operative complications, intra operative blood loss, postoperative requirement of analgesia , post-operative ambulating time and duration of post-operative hospital stay and to put forward best route of hysterectomy in non- descent cases. Compared to all other routes vaginal hysterectomy yields better outcome with less complications. The study was done on 50 cases fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly segregated in two groups- abdominal hysterectomy and NDVH (non-decent vaginal hysterectomy). Intra operative blood loss, Operative time and post-operative morbidity and hospital stay were less in NDVH groups. Nondecent vaginal hysterectomy is a better substitute to abdominal hysterectomy in cases with benign disorders of the uterus, with good mobility and adequate vaginal access.
非后天性阴道子宫切除术与全腹子宫切除术的前瞻性观察研究
子宫切除术是包括印度在内的全世界妇科医生最常见的手术之一。它是子宫切除术中最常见的选择性手术之一。影响子宫切除术路径的因素包括子宫的可及性和大小、附件病变的程度、外科医生的培训和经验。目前使用的子宫切除术有多种途径,腹部子宫切除术无疑比阴道子宫切除术更受欢迎。随着麻醉技术的进步、输血服务和抗生素的普及,子宫切除术已成为非妊娠相关大手术中最常见的手术。许多文献证实,阴道子宫切除术是最经济、最安全的子宫切除术,也是最常选择的腹腔途径。在这个微创手术的新时代,对于非妊娠适应症的阴道子宫切除术(即非妊娠阴道子宫切除术,NDVH)重新引起了人们的兴趣和重视,因为它比腹部子宫切除术有许多优点,如术后发病率低、美观、恢复更好更快。该研究的目的是比较和评估手术时间、术中和术后并发症、术中失血量、术后镇痛要求、术后行走时间和术后住院时间等因素,并提出非下行病例子宫切除术的最佳途径。与所有其他途径相比,阴道子宫切除术的效果更好,并发症更少。研究对象为符合纳入标准的 50 例患者。患者被随机分为两组--腹部子宫切除术组和非阴道子宫切除术组(NDVH)。NDVH组的术中失血量、手术时间、术后发病率和住院时间均较少。对于子宫良性病变、活动能力良好且有足够阴道通路的病例来说,非整容阴道子宫切除术是腹部子宫切除术的更好替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信