The Prognostic and Clinical Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Zihan Zhang, Jinghe Lang
{"title":"The Prognostic and Clinical Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Zihan Zhang, Jinghe Lang","doi":"10.5937/jomb0-46035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is a major gynecological malignancy with varying prognosis. The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) has been proposed as a potential prognostic biomarker. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic and clinical value of NLR in OC. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines, including studies that evaluated the association between NLR and survival outcomes in OC patients. Search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Quality assessment was done using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Heterogeneity was assessed, and pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using fixed or random-effects models as appropriate. Results: Twenty studies involving various ethnicities, ages, and sample sizes were included. A high NLR was found to be inversely correlated with overall survival (OS) (HR= 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.34, P<0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.38, P<0.001). Stratified analyses showed a stronger association in Asian patients, studies with smaller sample sizes, younger patients, and higher NLR cutoff values. Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggests a significant inverse association between NLR and survival outcomes in OC patients, emphasizing NLR's potential as a simple, cost-effective prognostic biomarker. However, substantial heterogeneity and influence of confounding factors underscore the need for further investigation.","PeriodicalId":16175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Biochemistry","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/jomb0-46035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is a major gynecological malignancy with varying prognosis. The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) has been proposed as a potential prognostic biomarker. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic and clinical value of NLR in OC. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines, including studies that evaluated the association between NLR and survival outcomes in OC patients. Search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Quality assessment was done using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Heterogeneity was assessed, and pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using fixed or random-effects models as appropriate. Results: Twenty studies involving various ethnicities, ages, and sample sizes were included. A high NLR was found to be inversely correlated with overall survival (OS) (HR= 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.34, P<0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.38, P<0.001). Stratified analyses showed a stronger association in Asian patients, studies with smaller sample sizes, younger patients, and higher NLR cutoff values. Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggests a significant inverse association between NLR and survival outcomes in OC patients, emphasizing NLR's potential as a simple, cost-effective prognostic biomarker. However, substantial heterogeneity and influence of confounding factors underscore the need for further investigation.
卵巢癌中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 (NLR) 的预后和临床价值:系统回顾与元分析
背景:卵巢癌(OC)是一种主要的妇科恶性肿瘤,其预后各不相同。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)被认为是一种潜在的预后生物标志物。本研究旨在评估 NLR 在 OC 中的预后和临床价值。 方法:按照 PRISMA 指南进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,包括评估 NLR 与 OC 患者生存结果之间关系的研究。在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了检索。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行质量评估。对异质性进行了评估,并酌情使用固定或随机效应模型计算了汇总的危险比(HRs)。 结果:共纳入了 20 项涉及不同种族、年龄和样本量的研究。研究发现,高NLR与总生存期(OS)(HR=1.21,95% CI 1.09-1.34,P<0.001)和无进展生存期(PFS)(HR=1.20,95% CI 1.03-1.38,P<0.001)呈反相关。分层分析表明,亚洲患者、样本量较小的研究、年轻患者和 NLR 临界值较高的患者的相关性更强。 结论荟萃分析表明,NLR 与 OC 患者的生存结果呈显著的负相关,强调了 NLR 作为一种简单、经济有效的预后生物标志物的潜力。然而,巨大的异质性和混杂因素的影响凸显了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Biochemistry
Journal of Medical Biochemistry BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JOURNAL OF MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY (J MED BIOCHEM) is the official journal of the Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia with international peer-review. Papers are independently reviewed by at least two reviewers selected by the Editors as Blind Peer Reviews. The Journal of Medical Biochemistry is published quarterly. The Journal publishes original scientific and specialized articles on all aspects of clinical and medical biochemistry, molecular medicine, clinical hematology and coagulation, clinical immunology and autoimmunity, clinical microbiology, virology, clinical genomics and molecular biology, genetic epidemiology, drug measurement, evaluation of diagnostic markers, new reagents and laboratory equipment, reference materials and methods, reference values, laboratory organization, automation, quality control, clinical metrology, all related scientific disciplines where chemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology and immunochemistry deal with the study of normal and pathologic processes in human beings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信