Evaluation of the peculiarity of the combined action of a number of chemicals based on the analysis of parameterized cause-effect relationships of marketers of exposure and negative effects and quantitative evaluation of additional health risk

N. Zaitseva, M. Zemlyanova, J. V. Koldibekova, D. Kiryanov, V. Chigvintsev
{"title":"Evaluation of the peculiarity of the combined action of a number of chemicals based on the analysis of parameterized cause-effect relationships of marketers of exposure and negative effects and quantitative evaluation of additional health risk","authors":"N. Zaitseva, M. Zemlyanova, J. V. Koldibekova, D. Kiryanov, V. Chigvintsev","doi":"10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-10-1132-1142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Assessing the type of combined action of chemicals is a complex and pressing problem of hygiene and preventive medicine. The purpose of the work is to expand methodological approaches to assessing the characteristics of the combined interaction of a number of chemical substances based on the analysis of parameterized cause-and-effect relationships of exposure and negative effects and quantitative assessment of additional health risks. Materials and methods. There was applied basic multiple logistic regression model, which is an assessment of the probability of developing a negative effect simultaneously with the isolated and combined effects of substances. The model was implemented for three components, the exposure of which was confirmed by exposure to biomarkers. Expert assessment of the type of combined action, carried out taking into account the regression coefficients of the adopted models. Quantitative assessment of the additional risk of negative effects from isolated and combined exposure to substances is carried out according to the parameters of cause-and-effect relationships of exposure to biomarkers and effects. Approbation of the methodological method provided for conditions of exposure to short-term aerogenic exposure to benzo(a)pyrene, significantly exceeding the reference concentrations (15.4 Rfc), with combustion oxide and hydrofluoride at the level of reference indicators (0.2–0.8 Rfc). The results of a study of cause-and-effect relationships based on previously conducted (in 2021–2022) medical examinations of four hundred fifty four exposed and unexposed 4-7 years children were used as biomarker effects. Results. Depending on the binary combination of three chemical substances and the choice of biomarker of the negative effect (8 indicators), various options for the combined action were identified (24 options in total). For 10 of them, an increase in the adverse effect was established. The predominant nature of the action is the synergistic nature, which causes, in addition to the isolated one, the risk of developing negative effects on the part of the immune, bone and nervous systems, exceeding up to 56.8 times the acceptable level. Limitations. During the combination effect, there was measured the substance in a binary combination of substances, taking into account the adverse effect and the direction of biomarkers. Conclusion. In the practice of hygienic assessments, it is necessary to take into account the additional risk of developing negative effects with more complex types of combined action (synergism, antagonism) than simple summation, which will increase the objectivity of the hygienic assessment of the risk to the health of the exposed population. Compliance with ethical standards. The study was approved by the local ethical committee of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Reservative Technologies for Risk Management of the Population of the Rospotrebnadzor (meeting protocol No. 2 dated 11.02.2021), and the Gelsinki Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association (as amended 2013) was carried out.","PeriodicalId":13009,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and sanitation","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and sanitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-10-1132-1142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Assessing the type of combined action of chemicals is a complex and pressing problem of hygiene and preventive medicine. The purpose of the work is to expand methodological approaches to assessing the characteristics of the combined interaction of a number of chemical substances based on the analysis of parameterized cause-and-effect relationships of exposure and negative effects and quantitative assessment of additional health risks. Materials and methods. There was applied basic multiple logistic regression model, which is an assessment of the probability of developing a negative effect simultaneously with the isolated and combined effects of substances. The model was implemented for three components, the exposure of which was confirmed by exposure to biomarkers. Expert assessment of the type of combined action, carried out taking into account the regression coefficients of the adopted models. Quantitative assessment of the additional risk of negative effects from isolated and combined exposure to substances is carried out according to the parameters of cause-and-effect relationships of exposure to biomarkers and effects. Approbation of the methodological method provided for conditions of exposure to short-term aerogenic exposure to benzo(a)pyrene, significantly exceeding the reference concentrations (15.4 Rfc), with combustion oxide and hydrofluoride at the level of reference indicators (0.2–0.8 Rfc). The results of a study of cause-and-effect relationships based on previously conducted (in 2021–2022) medical examinations of four hundred fifty four exposed and unexposed 4-7 years children were used as biomarker effects. Results. Depending on the binary combination of three chemical substances and the choice of biomarker of the negative effect (8 indicators), various options for the combined action were identified (24 options in total). For 10 of them, an increase in the adverse effect was established. The predominant nature of the action is the synergistic nature, which causes, in addition to the isolated one, the risk of developing negative effects on the part of the immune, bone and nervous systems, exceeding up to 56.8 times the acceptable level. Limitations. During the combination effect, there was measured the substance in a binary combination of substances, taking into account the adverse effect and the direction of biomarkers. Conclusion. In the practice of hygienic assessments, it is necessary to take into account the additional risk of developing negative effects with more complex types of combined action (synergism, antagonism) than simple summation, which will increase the objectivity of the hygienic assessment of the risk to the health of the exposed population. Compliance with ethical standards. The study was approved by the local ethical committee of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Reservative Technologies for Risk Management of the Population of the Rospotrebnadzor (meeting protocol No. 2 dated 11.02.2021), and the Gelsinki Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association (as amended 2013) was carried out.
根据对暴露和负面影响的营销者的参数化因果关系的分析,以及对额外健康风险的定量评估,评估多种化学品联合作用的特殊性
简介评估化学品的联合作用类型是卫生和预防医学领域一个复杂而紧迫的问题。 这项工作的目的是在分析接触和负面影响的参数化因果关系以及对额外健康风险进行定量评估的基础上,拓展评估多种化学物质联合作用特征的方法。 材料和方法。应用了基本的多元逻辑回归模型,该模型是对同时受到物质的单独和综合影响而产生负面效应的概率进行评估。该模型适用于三种成分,其暴露情况通过生物标志物的暴露情况进行确认。根据所采用模型的回归系数,对综合作用类型进行专家评估。根据生物标志物暴露和影响的因果关系参数,对单独和联合暴露于物质所产生的负面影响的额外风险进行定量评估。方法学方法的批准为短期气源接触苯并(a)芘提供了条件,大大超过了参考浓度(15.4 Rfc),燃烧氧化物和氢氟化物处于参考指标水平(0.2-0.8 Rfc)。根据先前(2021-2022 年)对 454 名接触和未接触苯并芘的 4-7 岁儿童进行的体检结果,对因果关系进行了研究,并将其作为生物标记效应。 研究结果根据三种化学物质的二元组合和负面影响生物标志物(8 个指标)的选择,确定了各种组合行动方案(共 24 个方案)。其中 10 个方案的负面影响增加。这种作用的主要性质是协同作用,除单独作用外,还可能对免疫系统、骨骼系统和神经系统产生负面影响,最高超过可接受水平的 56.8 倍。 局限性。在组合效应期间,考虑到不利影响和生物标志物的方向,对二元组合物质中的物质进行了测量。 结论。在卫生评估实践中,有必要考虑到更复杂类型的联合作用(协同作用、拮抗作用)比简单相加产生负面影响的额外风险,这将提高对暴露人群健康风险进行卫生评估的客观性。 遵守伦理标准。该研究获得了俄联邦人口风险管理医疗和防腐技术科学中心地方伦理委员会的批准(2021 年 2 月 11 日第 2 号会议协议),并执行了《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》(2013 年修订)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信