Leaders’ Coping Strategies After Abusive Behaviour – From the Eyes of the Perpetrator

Jannatul Rafia-Tracy
{"title":"Leaders’ Coping Strategies After Abusive Behaviour – From the Eyes of the Perpetrator","authors":"Jannatul Rafia-Tracy","doi":"10.1177/09721509231208327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of abusive supervision is prevalent in organizations across the board. However, the dark side of leadership is under-researched. The focus of this article is abusive managers’ coping strategy with the guilt of being abusive with subordinates. First, a review has been provided about abusive supervision, which was followed by different literature on coping strategies. Following the discussion on the methodology, findings on coping strategies adopted by managers were presented. Implications and limitations were also discussed at the end. Using qualitative research methodology and by interviewing 21 managers across four countries in seven different sectors data analysis revealed that managers adopt up to eight different types of coping strategies and the most used coping strategies are seeking social support, planning to reduce abusive behaviour, blaming others and acceptance. Moderately used coping strategies are self-control, the mental undoing of the transgression, rationalization and mental disengagement. No manager was found to adopt positive reinterpretation, resignation and plan to make up for the transgression as a coping strategy for their abusive behaviour towards employees.","PeriodicalId":503988,"journal":{"name":"Global Business Review","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231208327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of abusive supervision is prevalent in organizations across the board. However, the dark side of leadership is under-researched. The focus of this article is abusive managers’ coping strategy with the guilt of being abusive with subordinates. First, a review has been provided about abusive supervision, which was followed by different literature on coping strategies. Following the discussion on the methodology, findings on coping strategies adopted by managers were presented. Implications and limitations were also discussed at the end. Using qualitative research methodology and by interviewing 21 managers across four countries in seven different sectors data analysis revealed that managers adopt up to eight different types of coping strategies and the most used coping strategies are seeking social support, planning to reduce abusive behaviour, blaming others and acceptance. Moderately used coping strategies are self-control, the mental undoing of the transgression, rationalization and mental disengagement. No manager was found to adopt positive reinterpretation, resignation and plan to make up for the transgression as a coping strategy for their abusive behaviour towards employees.
施虐者眼中的领导者应对策略
滥用监督的问题在所有组织中都普遍存在。然而,人们对领导力的阴暗面研究不足。本文的重点是辱骂型管理者对辱骂下属的内疚感的应对策略。首先,本文回顾了有关滥用权力的监督的情况,然后介绍了有关应对策略的不同文献。在对研究方法进行讨论之后,介绍了有关管理人员所采取的应对策略的研究结果。最后还讨论了影响和局限性。通过采用定性研究方法,对四个国家七个不同部门的 21 名管理人员进行访谈,数据分析显示,管理人员采用了多达八种不同类型的应对策略,其中最常用的应对策略是寻求社会支持、计划减少虐待行为、指责他人和接受。中度使用的应对策略是自我控制、从心理上消除过失、合理化和心理脱离。没有发现管理者采用积极的重新解释、辞职和计划弥补过失作为其虐待员工行为的应对策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信