Comparative analysis of IgG levels in blood sera from patients with COVID-19, persons vaccinated by «Gam-COVID-Vac» and healthy donors before the pandemic

IF 3.1 4区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Y. Tarakanova, O. V. Borisova, D. Dmitriev, Maria V. Lichutina, Yulia S. Massino, A. Pechelyulko, Olga L. Segal, D. A. Yakovleva, Alexander D Dmitriev
{"title":"Comparative analysis of IgG levels in blood sera from patients with COVID-19, persons vaccinated by «Gam-COVID-Vac» and healthy donors before the pandemic","authors":"Y. Tarakanova, O. V. Borisova, D. Dmitriev, Maria V. Lichutina, Yulia S. Massino, A. Pechelyulko, Olga L. Segal, D. A. Yakovleva, Alexander D Dmitriev","doi":"10.36233/0372-9311-367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Serum IgG measurement is used in the diagnosis and monitoring of many diseases. Therefore, it seems important to study the impact of coronavirus pandemic on IgG levels in population and the role of this parameter in COVID-19. The aim of this study was to compare mean IgG levels in sera obtained from 31 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 30 healthy donors before pandemic and 34 donors vaccinated with «Sputnik V» (have not had COVID-19). Materials and methods. Total IgG was quantitated by two enzyme immunoassays (EIAs): «IgG Total-ELISA-BEST» kit certificated in Russia and homemade competitive EIA utilizing bispecific monoclonal antibodies (bsAbs) against human IgG (HIgG) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Results and discussion. The groups did not show differences in IgG levels (regardless of sex) with both methods giving comparable results. However, «IgG Total-ELISA-BEST» kit revealed statistically significant differences in mean serum IgG levels in subgroups of male patients depending on the levels of antibodies to viral RBD-antigen: below and above 400 BAU/ml. In the first subgroup (10 men) the mean serum IgG content was 14.3 ± 4.1 mg/mL, while in the second (6 men) — 6.9 ± 2.7 mg/mL. Conclusion. Sera obtained before pandemic contained the same mean IgG concentrations as sera from donors vaccinated with «Sputnik V» and COVID-19 patients. The relatively decreased mean IgG concentration was found only in COVID-19 male patients with anti-RBD antibodies levels above 400 BAU/ml. In light of literature data on association of decreased serum IgG with COVID-19 severity, it would be reasonable to further compare larger groups, taking into account clinical differences. The possibility of using bsAbs for human Ig measurements by competitive EIA was demonstrated.","PeriodicalId":9785,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Chinese Universities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Chinese Universities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36233/0372-9311-367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Serum IgG measurement is used in the diagnosis and monitoring of many diseases. Therefore, it seems important to study the impact of coronavirus pandemic on IgG levels in population and the role of this parameter in COVID-19. The aim of this study was to compare mean IgG levels in sera obtained from 31 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 30 healthy donors before pandemic and 34 donors vaccinated with «Sputnik V» (have not had COVID-19). Materials and methods. Total IgG was quantitated by two enzyme immunoassays (EIAs): «IgG Total-ELISA-BEST» kit certificated in Russia and homemade competitive EIA utilizing bispecific monoclonal antibodies (bsAbs) against human IgG (HIgG) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Results and discussion. The groups did not show differences in IgG levels (regardless of sex) with both methods giving comparable results. However, «IgG Total-ELISA-BEST» kit revealed statistically significant differences in mean serum IgG levels in subgroups of male patients depending on the levels of antibodies to viral RBD-antigen: below and above 400 BAU/ml. In the first subgroup (10 men) the mean serum IgG content was 14.3 ± 4.1 mg/mL, while in the second (6 men) — 6.9 ± 2.7 mg/mL. Conclusion. Sera obtained before pandemic contained the same mean IgG concentrations as sera from donors vaccinated with «Sputnik V» and COVID-19 patients. The relatively decreased mean IgG concentration was found only in COVID-19 male patients with anti-RBD antibodies levels above 400 BAU/ml. In light of literature data on association of decreased serum IgG with COVID-19 severity, it would be reasonable to further compare larger groups, taking into account clinical differences. The possibility of using bsAbs for human Ig measurements by competitive EIA was demonstrated.
大流行前 COVID-19 患者、"Gam-COVID-Vac "疫苗接种者和健康献血者血清中 IgG 含量的比较分析
简介血清 IgG 测量可用于多种疾病的诊断和监测。因此,研究冠状病毒大流行对人群 IgG 水平的影响以及该参数在 COVID-19 中的作用似乎很重要。 本研究的目的是比较 31 名住院的 COVID-19 患者、30 名大流行前的健康捐献者和 34 名接种过 "Sputnik V "疫苗的捐献者(未接种过 COVID-19)血清中的平均 IgG 水平。 材料和方法。通过两种酶免疫测定(EIA)对总 IgG 进行定量:俄罗斯认证的 "IgG Total-ELISA-BEST "试剂盒和利用针对人类 IgG (HIgG) 和辣根过氧化物酶 (HRP) 的双特异性单克隆抗体 (bsAbs) 的自制竞争性 EIA。 结果与讨论。各组的 IgG 水平没有差异(不考虑性别),两种方法得出的结果相当。然而,"IgG 总-ELISA-BEST "试剂盒显示,根据病毒 RBD 抗原抗体水平(低于和高于 400 BAU/ml)的不同,男性患者亚组的平均血清 IgG 水平存在显著的统计学差异。第一亚组(10 名男性)的平均血清 IgG 含量为 14.3 ± 4.1 毫克/毫升,而第二亚组(6 名男性)的平均血清 IgG 含量为 6.9 ± 2.7 毫克/毫升。 结论是大流行前获得的血清与接种 "斯普特尼克五号 "疫苗的供体和 COVID-19 患者血清中的平均 IgG 含量相同。只有 COVID-19 男性患者的抗 RBD 抗体水平超过 400 BAU/ml,其平均 IgG 浓度才相对降低。根据血清 IgG 降低与 COVID-19 严重程度相关的文献数据,考虑到临床差异,进一步比较更大的组别是合理的。通过竞争性 EIA 使用 bsAbs 测定人体 Ig 的可能性得到了证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
152
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research articles, letters/communications and reviews written by faculty members, researchers and postgraduates in universities, colleges and research institutes all over China and overseas. It reports the latest and most creative results of important fundamental research in all aspects of chemistry and of developments with significant consequences across subdisciplines. Main research areas include (but are not limited to): Organic chemistry (synthesis, characterization, and application); Inorganic chemistry (bio-inorganic chemistry, inorganic material chemistry); Analytical chemistry (especially chemometrics and the application of instrumental analysis and spectroscopy); Physical chemistry (mechanisms, catalysis, thermodynamics and dynamics); Polymer chemistry and polymer physics (mechanisms, material, catalysis, thermodynamics and dynamics); Quantum chemistry (quantum mechanical theory, quantum partition function, quantum statistical mechanics); Biochemistry; Biochemical engineering; Medicinal chemistry; Nanoscience (nanochemistry, nanomaterials).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信