In my opinion, the TOS… Situating personal data literacy interventions

IF 1.6 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
J. Raffaghelli, Marc Romero Carbonell, Teresa Romeu-Fontanillas
{"title":"In my opinion, the TOS… Situating personal data literacy interventions","authors":"J. Raffaghelli, Marc Romero Carbonell, Teresa Romeu-Fontanillas","doi":"10.1108/ils-06-2023-0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose It has been demonstrated that AI-powered, data-driven tools’ usage is not universal, but deeply linked to socio-cultural contexts. The purpose of this paper is to display the need of adopting situated lenses, relating to specific personal and professional learning about data protection and privacy. Design/methodology/approach The authors introduce the results of a case study based on a large educational intervention at a fully online university. The views of the participants from degrees representing different knowledge areas and contexts of technology adoption (work, education and leisure) were explored after engaging in the analysis of the terms and conditions of use about privacy and data usage. After consultation, 27 course instructors (CIs) integrated the activity and worked with 823 students (702 of whom were complete and correct for analytical purposes). Findings The results of this study indicated that the intervention increased privacy-conscious online behaviour among most participants. Results were more contradictory when looking at the tools’ daily usage, with overall positive considerations around the tools being mostly needed or “indispensable”. Research limitations/implications Though appliable only to the authors’ case study and not generalisable, the authors’ results show both the complexity of privacy views and the presence of forms of renunciation in the trade-off between data protection and the need of using a specific software into a personal and professional context. Practical implications This study provides an example of teaching and learning activities that supports the development of data literacy, with a focus on data privacy. Therefore, beyond the research findings, any educator can build over the authors’ proposal to produce materials and interventions aimed at developing awareness on data privacy issues. Social implications Developing awareness, understanding and skills relating to data privacy is crucial to live in a society where digital technologies are used in any area of our personal and professional life. Well-informed citizens will be able to obscure, resist or claim for their rights whenever a violation of their privacy takes place. Also, they will be able to support (through adoption) better quality apps and platforms, instead of passively accepting what is evident or easy to use. Originality/value The authors specifically spot how students and educators, as part of a specific learning and cultural ecosystem, need tailored opportunities to keep on reflecting on their degrees of freedom and their possibilities to act regarding evolving data systems and their alternatives.","PeriodicalId":44588,"journal":{"name":"Information and Learning Sciences","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-06-2023-0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose It has been demonstrated that AI-powered, data-driven tools’ usage is not universal, but deeply linked to socio-cultural contexts. The purpose of this paper is to display the need of adopting situated lenses, relating to specific personal and professional learning about data protection and privacy. Design/methodology/approach The authors introduce the results of a case study based on a large educational intervention at a fully online university. The views of the participants from degrees representing different knowledge areas and contexts of technology adoption (work, education and leisure) were explored after engaging in the analysis of the terms and conditions of use about privacy and data usage. After consultation, 27 course instructors (CIs) integrated the activity and worked with 823 students (702 of whom were complete and correct for analytical purposes). Findings The results of this study indicated that the intervention increased privacy-conscious online behaviour among most participants. Results were more contradictory when looking at the tools’ daily usage, with overall positive considerations around the tools being mostly needed or “indispensable”. Research limitations/implications Though appliable only to the authors’ case study and not generalisable, the authors’ results show both the complexity of privacy views and the presence of forms of renunciation in the trade-off between data protection and the need of using a specific software into a personal and professional context. Practical implications This study provides an example of teaching and learning activities that supports the development of data literacy, with a focus on data privacy. Therefore, beyond the research findings, any educator can build over the authors’ proposal to produce materials and interventions aimed at developing awareness on data privacy issues. Social implications Developing awareness, understanding and skills relating to data privacy is crucial to live in a society where digital technologies are used in any area of our personal and professional life. Well-informed citizens will be able to obscure, resist or claim for their rights whenever a violation of their privacy takes place. Also, they will be able to support (through adoption) better quality apps and platforms, instead of passively accepting what is evident or easy to use. Originality/value The authors specifically spot how students and educators, as part of a specific learning and cultural ecosystem, need tailored opportunities to keep on reflecting on their degrees of freedom and their possibilities to act regarding evolving data systems and their alternatives.
我认为,《服务条款》... 个人数据素养干预措施的定位
目的 事实证明,人工智能驱动的数据驱动工具的使用并不普遍,而是与社会文化背景密切相关。本文旨在说明采用情景透视法的必要性,它与有关数据保护和隐私的具体个人和专业学习有关。 设计/方法/途径 作者介绍了基于一所完全在线大学的大型教育干预的案例研究结果。在对有关隐私和数据使用的使用条款和条件进行分析后,探讨了代表不同知识领域和技术应用环境(工作、教育和休闲)的学位参与者的观点。经过协商,27 名课程讲师(CIs)整合了该活动,并与 823 名学生(其中 702 名学生的分析结果完整且正确)进行了合作。 研究结果 这项研究的结果表明,干预措施提高了大多数参与者的网络隐私意识。在考察这些工具的日常使用情况时,结果则较为矛盾,总体上,这些工具被认为是 "必需的 "或 "不可或缺的"。 研究局限性/启示 作者的研究结果虽然只适用于作者的案例研究,并不具有普遍性,但它显示了隐私观点的复杂性,以及在数据保护与个人和职业背景下使用特定软件的需要之间权衡时存在的放弃形式。 实践意义 本研究提供了一个支持数据素养发展的教学活动实例,重点是数据隐私。因此,除了研究成果之外,任何教育工作者都可以在作者建议的基础上,编写旨在培养数据隐私意识的材料和干预措施。 社会影响 培养与数据隐私有关的意识、理解和技能,对于我们生活在一个数字技术应用于个人和职业生活任何领域的社会中至关重要。在隐私权受到侵犯时,充分了解情况的公民将能够掩盖、抵制或主张自己的权利。此外,他们还能支持(通过采用)质量更好的应用程序和平台,而不是被动地接受显而易见或易于使用的东西。 独创性/价值 作者特别指出,作为特定学习和文化生态系统的一部分,学生和教育工作者需要有针对性的机会来不断反思他们的自由度,以及他们对不断发展的数据系统及其替代品采取行动的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information and Learning Sciences
Information and Learning Sciences INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Information and Learning Sciences advances inter-disciplinary research that explores scholarly intersections shared within 2 key fields: information science and the learning sciences / education sciences. The journal provides a publication venue for work that strengthens our scholarly understanding of human inquiry and learning phenomena, especially as they relate to design and uses of information and e-learning systems innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信