Adaptive phenotypic plasticity of mandibles with respect to host plants

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Indukala Prasannakumar, Ullasa Kodandaramaiah
{"title":"Adaptive phenotypic plasticity of mandibles with respect to host plants","authors":"Indukala Prasannakumar,&nbsp;Ullasa Kodandaramaiah","doi":"10.1007/s11829-023-10013-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Polyphagous butterflies, i.e., those that feed on multiple host plants, need to evolve adaptations against the defenses of many plants. Studies have focused on chemical defenses of host plants and counter-adaptations of their herbivores. Physical defenses, despite being the first line of defense of many plants, have received little attention. Grass feeding butterflies are among the most speciose adaptive radiations among insects. Grasses rely primarily on physical rather than chemical defenses. Therefore, it is interesting to understand how butterflies have adapted to grass feeding. Mandibles are the principal biting and chewing organs in insect larvae, and mandible morphology should affect the ability of butterflies to effectively feed on their host plants. We here ask whether grass feeding butterflies have plasticity in mandibular morphology to cope with grass physical defenses, using the widespread grass feeding butterfly <i>Mycalesis mineus</i> as a model. We first show that physical defenses of grasses, such as leaf toughness, presence of silica deposits and trichomes, negatively affect body size of the butterfly. Our results further indicate that larvae of <i>M. mineus</i> show mandible plasticity, with increased mandibular length and relative mass investment, when feeding on tougher leaves and leaves with silica deposits. We suggest that the evolution of mandible plasticity may have been a key component of the coevolutionary arms race between grasses and herbivorous insects. This plasticity may have also allowed butterflies such as <i>M. mineus</i> to colonize a broad range of habitats and geographic regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"18 1","pages":"77 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-023-10013-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polyphagous butterflies, i.e., those that feed on multiple host plants, need to evolve adaptations against the defenses of many plants. Studies have focused on chemical defenses of host plants and counter-adaptations of their herbivores. Physical defenses, despite being the first line of defense of many plants, have received little attention. Grass feeding butterflies are among the most speciose adaptive radiations among insects. Grasses rely primarily on physical rather than chemical defenses. Therefore, it is interesting to understand how butterflies have adapted to grass feeding. Mandibles are the principal biting and chewing organs in insect larvae, and mandible morphology should affect the ability of butterflies to effectively feed on their host plants. We here ask whether grass feeding butterflies have plasticity in mandibular morphology to cope with grass physical defenses, using the widespread grass feeding butterfly Mycalesis mineus as a model. We first show that physical defenses of grasses, such as leaf toughness, presence of silica deposits and trichomes, negatively affect body size of the butterfly. Our results further indicate that larvae of M. mineus show mandible plasticity, with increased mandibular length and relative mass investment, when feeding on tougher leaves and leaves with silica deposits. We suggest that the evolution of mandible plasticity may have been a key component of the coevolutionary arms race between grasses and herbivorous insects. This plasticity may have also allowed butterflies such as M. mineus to colonize a broad range of habitats and geographic regions.

下颚对寄主植物的适应性表型可塑性
多食性蝴蝶,即以多种寄主植物为食的蝴蝶,需要进化适应多种植物的防御能力。研究主要集中于寄主植物的化学防御及其食草动物的反适应。物理防御尽管是许多植物的第一道防线,但却很少受到关注。以草为食的蝴蝶是昆虫中最特殊的适应性辐射之一。禾本科植物主要依靠物理防御而非化学防御。因此,了解蝴蝶是如何适应草食性的是很有意义的。下颚是昆虫幼虫的主要咬嚼器官,下颚形态应该会影响蝴蝶有效取食寄主植物的能力。在此,我们以广泛分布的草食性蝴蝶Mycalesis mineus为模型,探讨草食性蝴蝶的下颚形态是否具有可塑性,以应对草的物理防御。我们首先发现,草的物理防御(如叶片的韧性、硅沉积物和毛状体的存在)会对蝴蝶的体型产生负面影响。我们的研究结果进一步表明,米氏蝶类幼虫在取食韧性较强的叶片和有二氧化硅沉积的叶片时,会表现出下颚的可塑性,下颚长度和相对质量投资都会增加。我们认为,下颚可塑性的进化可能是草和食草昆虫之间共同进化军备竞赛的一个关键组成部分。这种可塑性还可能使蝴蝶(如M. mineus)能够在广泛的栖息地和地理区域定居。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Arthropod-Plant Interactions 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism. Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信