The Australian landscape of newborn screening in the genomics era

Charli Ji, Michelle A. Farrar, Sarah Norris, Kaustuv Bhattacharya, Bruce Bennetts, A. Newson, Louise Healy, N. Millis, Didu S Kariyawasam
{"title":"The Australian landscape of newborn screening in the genomics era","authors":"Charli Ji, Michelle A. Farrar, Sarah Norris, Kaustuv Bhattacharya, Bruce Bennetts, A. Newson, Louise Healy, N. Millis, Didu S Kariyawasam","doi":"10.20517/rdodj.2023.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Australia, over 300,000 newborns undergo newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) annually, with approximately 1 in 1,000 identified with a rare but actionable condition through this pathway. Prior to 2018, the inclusion criteria for adding conditions in NBS panels was inconsistent nationally, leading to the development of the Australian National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Policy Framework. This framework promotes systematic and evidence-based inclusion of conditions using criteria closely informed by traditional Wilson and Junger screening principles. Current policy initiatives are focused on achieving national consistency in the conditions screened. NBS programs, initiated in the 1960s, have used a variety of techniques, including but not limited to tandem mass spectrometry and immunological assays. The acceleration of genomic technologies has the potential to greatly increase the number of conditions screened and match affected newborns with innovative treatment options, including advanced (gene, immune modulation, and RNA) therapies. This review describes the evolution, current status quo, and outlook for Australian NBS programs with a focus on the implications of wider adoption of genomic newborn screening (gNBS) in our culturally, geographically, and genetically diverse population. We discuss the potential for transformative benefits for families with children identified by gNBS and how this must be balanced against the potential for a range of unintended negative consequences. We emphasise the importance of a nationally agreed, coordinated, and streamlined approach to the addition and removal of conditions from Australian NBS programs, which considers the utility, cost, ethical, and equity aspects of gNBS.","PeriodicalId":74638,"journal":{"name":"Rare disease and orphan drugs journal","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rare disease and orphan drugs journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/rdodj.2023.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Australia, over 300,000 newborns undergo newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) annually, with approximately 1 in 1,000 identified with a rare but actionable condition through this pathway. Prior to 2018, the inclusion criteria for adding conditions in NBS panels was inconsistent nationally, leading to the development of the Australian National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Policy Framework. This framework promotes systematic and evidence-based inclusion of conditions using criteria closely informed by traditional Wilson and Junger screening principles. Current policy initiatives are focused on achieving national consistency in the conditions screened. NBS programs, initiated in the 1960s, have used a variety of techniques, including but not limited to tandem mass spectrometry and immunological assays. The acceleration of genomic technologies has the potential to greatly increase the number of conditions screened and match affected newborns with innovative treatment options, including advanced (gene, immune modulation, and RNA) therapies. This review describes the evolution, current status quo, and outlook for Australian NBS programs with a focus on the implications of wider adoption of genomic newborn screening (gNBS) in our culturally, geographically, and genetically diverse population. We discuss the potential for transformative benefits for families with children identified by gNBS and how this must be balanced against the potential for a range of unintended negative consequences. We emphasise the importance of a nationally agreed, coordinated, and streamlined approach to the addition and removal of conditions from Australian NBS programs, which considers the utility, cost, ethical, and equity aspects of gNBS.
基因组学时代澳大利亚的新生儿筛查现状
在澳大利亚,每年有超过 30 万名新生儿接受新生儿血斑筛查(NBS),其中约有千分之一的新生儿通过这一途径被确定患有罕见但可采取行动的疾病。2018 年之前,全国范围内 NBS 面板中添加病症的纳入标准并不一致,因此制定了《澳大利亚全国新生儿血斑筛查政策框架》。该框架采用与传统的威尔逊和容格筛查原则密切相关的标准,促进系统化和循证地纳入病症。目前的政策措施重点在于实现全国筛查病症的一致性。20 世纪 60 年代启动的新生儿筛查计划采用了多种技术,包括但不限于串联质谱法和免疫测定法。基因组技术的加速发展有可能大大增加筛查病症的数量,并为受影响的新生儿匹配创新的治疗方案,包括先进的(基因、免疫调节和 RNA)疗法。本综述介绍了澳大利亚新生儿筛查项目的发展、现状和前景,重点关注在我国文化、地理和基因多样化的人口中更广泛地采用基因组新生儿筛查(gNBS)的影响。我们讨论了通过基因组新生儿筛查(gNBS)发现患儿的家庭可能获得的变革性益处,以及必须如何将这种益处与可能产生的一系列意外负面影响相平衡。我们强调,在澳大利亚国家健康调查项目中增加和删除条件时,必须采取全国一致、协调和简化的方法,并考虑到 gNBS 的效用、成本、伦理和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信