Embankments Reinforced by Vertical Inclusions on Soft Soil: Numerical Study of Stress Redistribution

Minh-Tuan Pham, Duc‐Dung Pham, Duy-Liem Vu, Daniel Dias
{"title":"Embankments Reinforced by Vertical Inclusions on Soft Soil: Numerical Study of Stress Redistribution","authors":"Minh-Tuan Pham, Duc‐Dung Pham, Duy-Liem Vu, Daniel Dias","doi":"10.3390/geotechnics3040069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constructing embankments over soft soils is a challenge for geotechnical engineers due to large settlements. Among diverse ground-improvement methods, combining piles and geosynthetics (e.g., geosynthetic-reinforced piles, deep cement mixing columns, geotextile-encased columns) emerges as a reliable solution for time-bound projects and challenging ground conditions. While stress distribution within pile-supported embankments has been extensively studied, the load transfer efficiency of piled solutions with geosynthetic reinforcement remains less explored. The novelty in this study lies in the investigation of three different inclusion solutions from a common control case in the numerical model considering the role of geosynthetic reinforcement. This study investigates the load transfer mechanisms in embankments supported by various techniques including geosynthetic-reinforced piles, deep cement mixing columns, and geosynthetic-encased granular columns. Two-dimensional axisymmetric finite element models were developed for three cases of embankments supported by vertical inclusions. Numerical findings allow clarification of the soft ground and embankment characteristics which influence the arching and membrane efficiencies. Rigid piles outperform deep cement mixing (DCM) columns and geotextile-encased columns (GEC) in reducing settlements of soft ground. Geosynthetic reinforcements are particularly helpful for rigid pile solutions in high embankments due to their load transfer capability. Additionally, physical properties of fill soil can impact the inclusion solutions, with high shear resistance enhancing the arching effect and lower modulus subsoils showing better arching performance.","PeriodicalId":505610,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnics","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics3040069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Constructing embankments over soft soils is a challenge for geotechnical engineers due to large settlements. Among diverse ground-improvement methods, combining piles and geosynthetics (e.g., geosynthetic-reinforced piles, deep cement mixing columns, geotextile-encased columns) emerges as a reliable solution for time-bound projects and challenging ground conditions. While stress distribution within pile-supported embankments has been extensively studied, the load transfer efficiency of piled solutions with geosynthetic reinforcement remains less explored. The novelty in this study lies in the investigation of three different inclusion solutions from a common control case in the numerical model considering the role of geosynthetic reinforcement. This study investigates the load transfer mechanisms in embankments supported by various techniques including geosynthetic-reinforced piles, deep cement mixing columns, and geosynthetic-encased granular columns. Two-dimensional axisymmetric finite element models were developed for three cases of embankments supported by vertical inclusions. Numerical findings allow clarification of the soft ground and embankment characteristics which influence the arching and membrane efficiencies. Rigid piles outperform deep cement mixing (DCM) columns and geotextile-encased columns (GEC) in reducing settlements of soft ground. Geosynthetic reinforcements are particularly helpful for rigid pile solutions in high embankments due to their load transfer capability. Additionally, physical properties of fill soil can impact the inclusion solutions, with high shear resistance enhancing the arching effect and lower modulus subsoils showing better arching performance.
软土上的垂直夹杂物加固路堤:应力再分布数值研究
由于沉降量大,在软土上筑堤对岩土工程师来说是一项挑战。在各种地基改善方法中,结合桩和土工合成材料(如土工合成材料加固桩、深层水泥搅拌柱、土工织物包裹柱)是一种可靠的解决方案,可用于时间紧迫的项目和具有挑战性的地基条件。虽然对桩基支撑路堤内的应力分布进行了广泛研究,但对土工合成材料加固的桩基解决方案的荷载传递效率的探讨仍然较少。本研究的新颖之处在于,考虑到土工合成材料加固的作用,在数值模型中对来自普通控制案例的三种不同包含方案进行了研究。本研究探讨了由土工合成材料加固桩、深层水泥搅拌柱和土工合成材料包裹的颗粒柱等不同技术支撑的堤坝的荷载传递机制。针对三种由垂直夹层支撑的路堤情况,建立了二维轴对称有限元模型。数值研究结果明确了影响拱起和膜效率的软土地基和路堤特征。在减少软土地基沉降方面,刚性桩优于深层水泥搅拌(DCM)柱和土工织物包裹柱(GEC)。土工合成材料加固因其荷载转移能力,特别适用于高路堤的刚性桩解决方案。此外,填土的物理性质也会影响包容方案,高抗剪性会增强起拱效果,而低模量的基土则会显示出更好的起拱性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信