Bond Behavior of Stainless-Steel and Ordinary Reinforcement Bars in Refractory Castables under Elevated Temperatures

IF 3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Linas Plioplys, A. Kudžma, A. Sokolov, V. Antonovič, V. Gribniak
{"title":"Bond Behavior of Stainless-Steel and Ordinary Reinforcement Bars in Refractory Castables under Elevated Temperatures","authors":"Linas Plioplys, A. Kudžma, A. Sokolov, V. Antonovič, V. Gribniak","doi":"10.3390/jcs7120485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refractory castables, i.e., refractory aggregates and ultra-fine particle mixtures with calcium aluminate cement (CAC) and deflocculants, were created 40 years ago for the metallurgy and petrochemical industries. These materials demonstrate outstanding performance even over 1000 °C. Typically, they have no structural reinforcement, resisting compression stresses because of the combination of temperature and mechanical loads. This study is a part of the research project that develops high-temperature resistance composite material suitable for fire and explosion protection of building structures. However, this application is impossible without structural reinforcement, and the bond performance problem becomes essential under high temperatures. This experimental work conducts pull-out tests of austenitic stainless 304 steel bars and typical structural S500 steel bars embedded in refractory castables after high-temperature treatments. This study includes plain and ribbed bars and considers two castable materials designed with 25 wt% CAC content for 50 MPa compressive strength after drying (typical design) and 100 MPa strength (modified with 2.5 wt% microsilica). This test program includes 115 samples for pull-out tests and 88 specimens for compression. As expected, the tests demonstrated the plain bars’ inability to resist the bond stresses already at 400 °C; on the contrary, ribbed bars, even made of structural steel, could ensure a mechanical bond with cement matrix up to 1000 °C. However, only stainless steel bars formed a reliable bond with the high-performance castable, determining a promising object for high-temperature applications. Still, the scatter of the test results did not ensure a reliable bonding model. In addition, the castable strength might not be optimal to ensure maximum bond performance. Thus, the test results clarified the research objectives for further developing the reinforced composite.","PeriodicalId":15435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Composites Science","volume":"615 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Composites Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7120485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Refractory castables, i.e., refractory aggregates and ultra-fine particle mixtures with calcium aluminate cement (CAC) and deflocculants, were created 40 years ago for the metallurgy and petrochemical industries. These materials demonstrate outstanding performance even over 1000 °C. Typically, they have no structural reinforcement, resisting compression stresses because of the combination of temperature and mechanical loads. This study is a part of the research project that develops high-temperature resistance composite material suitable for fire and explosion protection of building structures. However, this application is impossible without structural reinforcement, and the bond performance problem becomes essential under high temperatures. This experimental work conducts pull-out tests of austenitic stainless 304 steel bars and typical structural S500 steel bars embedded in refractory castables after high-temperature treatments. This study includes plain and ribbed bars and considers two castable materials designed with 25 wt% CAC content for 50 MPa compressive strength after drying (typical design) and 100 MPa strength (modified with 2.5 wt% microsilica). This test program includes 115 samples for pull-out tests and 88 specimens for compression. As expected, the tests demonstrated the plain bars’ inability to resist the bond stresses already at 400 °C; on the contrary, ribbed bars, even made of structural steel, could ensure a mechanical bond with cement matrix up to 1000 °C. However, only stainless steel bars formed a reliable bond with the high-performance castable, determining a promising object for high-temperature applications. Still, the scatter of the test results did not ensure a reliable bonding model. In addition, the castable strength might not be optimal to ensure maximum bond performance. Thus, the test results clarified the research objectives for further developing the reinforced composite.
高温条件下不锈钢和普通钢筋在耐火浇注料中的粘结行为
耐火浇注料,即耐火集料和铝酸钙水泥(CAC)及脱沫剂的超细颗粒混合物,是 40 年前为冶金和石化工业而开发的。即使温度超过 1000 °C,这些材料也能表现出卓越的性能。通常情况下,它们没有结构加固,在温度和机械负荷的共同作用下可抵抗压缩应力。本研究是开发适用于建筑结构防火防爆的耐高温复合材料研究项目的一部分。然而,如果没有结构加固,这种应用是不可能实现的,因此高温下的粘结性能问题变得至关重要。本实验对高温处理后嵌入耐火浇注料中的奥氏体不锈钢 304 钢筋和典型结构 S500 钢筋进行了拉拔试验。这项研究包括普通钢棒和带肋钢棒,并考虑了两种耐火浇注料,其中 CAC 含量为 25 wt%,干燥后抗压强度分别为 50 MPa(典型设计)和 100 MPa(用 2.5 wt% 微硅改性)。该测试程序包括 115 个拉拔测试样本和 88 个压缩测试样本。不出所料,试验结果表明,普通钢筋在 400 °C 时就已无法抵抗粘结应力;相反,带肋钢筋,即使是由结构钢制成,也能确保与水泥基体的机械粘结温度高达 1000 °C。然而,只有不锈钢棒材能与高性能浇注料形成可靠的粘结,这就为高温应用奠定了基础。然而,测试结果的分散性并不能确保可靠的结合模型。此外,浇注料的强度也可能不是确保最大粘接性能的最佳值。因此,测试结果明确了进一步开发增强复合材料的研究目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Composites Science
Journal of Composites Science MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
328
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信