Surgical Management of Full-Thickness Macular Holes Spontaneously Arising From Lamellar Macular Holes

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Anubhav Garg, Charbel Wahab, Peng Yan
{"title":"Surgical Management of Full-Thickness Macular Holes Spontaneously Arising From Lamellar Macular Holes","authors":"Anubhav Garg, Charbel Wahab, Peng Yan","doi":"10.1177/24741264231208493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To review the literature regarding surgical management of full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) spontaneously arising from lamellar MHs (LMHs). Methods: The literature on surgically managed FTMHs arising from LMHs was reviewed via Ovid MEDLINE and Embase through June 5, 2022. Results: Seventy-six eyes from 16 articles were included. Forty eyes had internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, 32 inverted ILM flap techniques, and 4 an unclear surgical technique. The FTMH closure rate was not significantly different between ILM peeling (34/40 [85%]) and the inverted ILM flap techniques (28/32 [88%]) ( P = .761). The mean (±SD) logMAR visual acuity improved from 0.64 ± 0.46 to 0.25 ± 0.22 (Snellen 20/87 to 20/36) with ILM peeling (n = 30); similar data were not available for inverted ILM flap techniques. Conclusions: Foveal tissue loss, flat hole edges, and limited retinal hydration may result in inverted ILM flap techniques having outcomes similar to those of ILM peeling in repairing FTMHs from LMHs. Future studies are needed to compare techniques.","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264231208493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To review the literature regarding surgical management of full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) spontaneously arising from lamellar MHs (LMHs). Methods: The literature on surgically managed FTMHs arising from LMHs was reviewed via Ovid MEDLINE and Embase through June 5, 2022. Results: Seventy-six eyes from 16 articles were included. Forty eyes had internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, 32 inverted ILM flap techniques, and 4 an unclear surgical technique. The FTMH closure rate was not significantly different between ILM peeling (34/40 [85%]) and the inverted ILM flap techniques (28/32 [88%]) ( P = .761). The mean (±SD) logMAR visual acuity improved from 0.64 ± 0.46 to 0.25 ± 0.22 (Snellen 20/87 to 20/36) with ILM peeling (n = 30); similar data were not available for inverted ILM flap techniques. Conclusions: Foveal tissue loss, flat hole edges, and limited retinal hydration may result in inverted ILM flap techniques having outcomes similar to those of ILM peeling in repairing FTMHs from LMHs. Future studies are needed to compare techniques.
鳞状黄斑孔自发形成的全厚黄斑孔的手术治疗
简介:回顾有关板层黄斑孔(LMH)自发形成的全厚黄斑孔(FTMH)手术治疗的文献。方法:通过 Ovid MEDLINE 和 Embase 对截至 2022 年 6 月 5 日有关 LMHs 引起的全厚黄斑洞手术治疗的文献进行了回顾。结果共纳入16篇文章中的76只眼睛。其中40眼采用了内缘膜(ILM)剥离,32眼采用了倒置ILM瓣技术,4眼采用了不明确的手术技术。ILM剥离(34/40 [85%])和倒置ILM瓣技术(28/32 [88%])的FTMH闭合率无明显差异(P = .761)。ILM剥离术的平均(±SD)logMAR视力从0.64±0.46提高到0.25±0.22(Snellen 20/87到20/36)(n = 30);倒置ILM瓣技术没有类似数据。结论眼窝组织缺失、扁平的孔边缘和有限的视网膜水合可能导致倒置的ILM瓣技术在修复LMH的FTMH时与ILM剥离的结果相似。未来的研究需要对这些技术进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信