Systematic Review of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Language Education: A Balanced Perspective

Lhoussine Qasserras
{"title":"Systematic Review of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Language Education: A Balanced Perspective","authors":"Lhoussine Qasserras","doi":"10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.6.763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a comprehensive review of communicative language teaching (CLT) in language education, considering both the positive impact of the approach and the criticisms raised by scholars. CLT has garnered significant attention in language education due to its emphasis on promoting effective communication and meaningful language use. This systematic review presents an impartial and well-rounded analysis of the pros and cons of CLT, citing previous studies in the literature review. It highlights the positive results of past research, demonstrating how CLT can enhance students’ communicative competence, language proficiency, cultural awareness, learner autonomy, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. However, other studies have criticized CLT, raising concerns about its lack of explicit grammar and vocabulary instruction, insufficient preparation for formal writing, standardized exams, insufficient attention to individual learner differences, and emphasis on fluency over accuracy. By presenting both perspectives, this article aims to provide educators with a balanced understanding of CLT’s potential strengths and limitations, guiding them in designing effective language teaching practices.","PeriodicalId":503832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education and Pedagogy","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.6.763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive review of communicative language teaching (CLT) in language education, considering both the positive impact of the approach and the criticisms raised by scholars. CLT has garnered significant attention in language education due to its emphasis on promoting effective communication and meaningful language use. This systematic review presents an impartial and well-rounded analysis of the pros and cons of CLT, citing previous studies in the literature review. It highlights the positive results of past research, demonstrating how CLT can enhance students’ communicative competence, language proficiency, cultural awareness, learner autonomy, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. However, other studies have criticized CLT, raising concerns about its lack of explicit grammar and vocabulary instruction, insufficient preparation for formal writing, standardized exams, insufficient attention to individual learner differences, and emphasis on fluency over accuracy. By presenting both perspectives, this article aims to provide educators with a balanced understanding of CLT’s potential strengths and limitations, guiding them in designing effective language teaching practices.
语言教育中的交际语言教学 (CLT) 系统回顾:平衡视角
本文对语言教育中的交际语言教学(CLT)进行了全面回顾,既考虑了该方法的积极影响,也考虑了学者们提出的批评意见。由于交际语言教学强调促进有效交流和有意义的语言使用,因此在语言教育领域备受关注。本系统综述在文献综述中引用了以往的研究,对语言教学法的利弊进行了公正、全面的分析。综述强调了以往研究的积极成果,展示了语言教学如何提高学生的交际能力、语言水平、文化意识、学习自主性、批判性思维和解决问题的能力。然而,也有一些研究对 CLT 提出了批评,认为 CLT 缺乏明确的语法和词汇教学,没有为正式写作和标准化考试做好充分准备,没有充分关注学习者的个体差异,以及强调流畅性而非准确性。通过介绍这两种观点,本文旨在让教育工作者均衡地了解语言教学法的潜在优势和局限性,指导他们设计有效的语言教学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书