Trading on Diverse Relationships: The Process of Racialized Social Commodification in Multiracial Congregations

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES
O. Okuwobi, Christopher W. Munn, Korie L. Edwards
{"title":"Trading on Diverse Relationships: The Process of Racialized Social Commodification in Multiracial Congregations","authors":"O. Okuwobi, Christopher W. Munn, Korie L. Edwards","doi":"10.1177/23326492231213327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diverse organizations focus on appearing progressive but, in practice, may reproduce internal and external racial inequalities. Previous research has focused on how organizations with superficial levels of diversity may be detrimental to racial equity; are organizations with deep and sustained, cross-racial relationships any better? Drawing on in-depth interviews, field notes, and surveys of 121 head clergy of multiracial churches, we examine the strategies of leaders of multiracial churches to raise funds for their organizations. Our systematic analysis reveals how these, mostly White, religious leaders act as brokers by leveraging embeddedness with congregants of color, social and cultural capital within institutions valuing diversity, and the racial status of their organizations to gain access to social and organizational benefits. We develop a theoretical concept called “racialized social commodification” (RSC) to explore how leaders convert the racial capital of people of color into social and economic resources in contexts of substantive diversity. Through RSC, even organizations boasting strong, cross-racial relationships continue to reproduce racial inequality by protecting power and resource hierarchies that benefit White Americans.","PeriodicalId":46879,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Race and Ethnicity","volume":"106 1","pages":"16 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Race and Ethnicity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492231213327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diverse organizations focus on appearing progressive but, in practice, may reproduce internal and external racial inequalities. Previous research has focused on how organizations with superficial levels of diversity may be detrimental to racial equity; are organizations with deep and sustained, cross-racial relationships any better? Drawing on in-depth interviews, field notes, and surveys of 121 head clergy of multiracial churches, we examine the strategies of leaders of multiracial churches to raise funds for their organizations. Our systematic analysis reveals how these, mostly White, religious leaders act as brokers by leveraging embeddedness with congregants of color, social and cultural capital within institutions valuing diversity, and the racial status of their organizations to gain access to social and organizational benefits. We develop a theoretical concept called “racialized social commodification” (RSC) to explore how leaders convert the racial capital of people of color into social and economic resources in contexts of substantive diversity. Through RSC, even organizations boasting strong, cross-racial relationships continue to reproduce racial inequality by protecting power and resource hierarchies that benefit White Americans.
多元关系交易:多种族会众中种族化社会商品化的过程
多元化组织注重表面上的进步,但实际上可能会复制内部和外部的种族不平等。以往的研究主要关注表面多元化的组织如何不利于种族公平,那么具有深层次和持续的跨种族关系的组织是否更好呢?我们通过对 121 个多种族教会的神职人员负责人进行深入访谈、实地记录和调查,研究了多种族教会领导人为其组织筹集资金的策略。我们的系统分析揭示了这些大多为白人的宗教领袖如何通过利用与有色人种会众的嵌入关系、重视多样性的机构内的社会和文化资本以及其组织的种族地位来获得社会和组织利益,从而充当中间人。我们提出了一个名为 "种族化社会商品化"(RSC)的理论概念,以探讨在实质性多元化背景下,领导者如何将有色人种的种族资本转化为社会和经济资源。通过 RSC,即使是拥有强大的跨种族关系的组织,也会通过保护有利于美国白人的权力和资源等级制度,继续复制种族不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信