Intracranial hemorrhage detection: how much can windowing, transfer learning and data augmentation affect a deep learning model’s performance?

Pedro Lacerda, Rosalvo Ferreira De Oliveira Neto
{"title":"Intracranial hemorrhage detection: how much can windowing, transfer learning and data augmentation affect a deep learning model’s performance?","authors":"Pedro Lacerda, Rosalvo Ferreira De Oliveira Neto","doi":"10.5335/rbca.v15i3.14792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of Deep Neural Networks to detect intracranial hemorrhage from computed tomography images has been widely used in clinical medicine. In general, building these solutions combines three types of approaches: Preprocessing, Transfer Learning, and Data Augmentation. This study’s goal was to measure the contribution of each of these approaches and thus highlight which approach has more margin of improvement. An experimental study was conducted on a public dataset containing computerized tomography images. The comparison used the stratified ten-fold cross-validation process to set confidence intervals evaluating performance measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The ResNet-50 was the deep learning model selected. The results showed that all the approaches raise the generalization power when applied in isolation, and Data Augmentation offers the most significant gain to the baseline. The experiment also showed an opportunity to improve the detection of intracranial hemorrhage by applying new preprocessing techniques since this was the approach that showed the smallest increase in discriminatory power among the investigated approaches. The paired Wilcoxon’s Signed-Rank Test showed that not all the differences were statistically significant, with a confidence level of 95%.","PeriodicalId":138408,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada","volume":"4668 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5335/rbca.v15i3.14792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of Deep Neural Networks to detect intracranial hemorrhage from computed tomography images has been widely used in clinical medicine. In general, building these solutions combines three types of approaches: Preprocessing, Transfer Learning, and Data Augmentation. This study’s goal was to measure the contribution of each of these approaches and thus highlight which approach has more margin of improvement. An experimental study was conducted on a public dataset containing computerized tomography images. The comparison used the stratified ten-fold cross-validation process to set confidence intervals evaluating performance measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The ResNet-50 was the deep learning model selected. The results showed that all the approaches raise the generalization power when applied in isolation, and Data Augmentation offers the most significant gain to the baseline. The experiment also showed an opportunity to improve the detection of intracranial hemorrhage by applying new preprocessing techniques since this was the approach that showed the smallest increase in discriminatory power among the investigated approaches. The paired Wilcoxon’s Signed-Rank Test showed that not all the differences were statistically significant, with a confidence level of 95%.
颅内出血检测:开窗、迁移学习和数据增强对深度学习模型的性能有多大影响?
应用深度神经网络从计算机断层扫描图像中检测颅内出血已广泛应用于临床医学。一般来说,构建这些解决方案需要结合三类方法:预处理、迁移学习和数据增强。本研究的目标是衡量每种方法的贡献,从而突出哪种方法有更大的改进余地。我们在一个包含计算机断层扫描图像的公共数据集上进行了实验研究。比较使用了分层十倍交叉验证过程来设定置信区间,通过接收器工作特征曲线下的面积来评估性能。所选的深度学习模型是 ResNet-50。结果表明,所有方法在单独应用时都能提高泛化能力,而数据增强方法比基线方法的增益最为显著。实验还显示,通过应用新的预处理技术,有机会提高颅内出血的检测能力,因为这是所有研究方法中判别能力提高幅度最小的一种方法。配对 Wilcoxon's Signed-Rank 检验表明,并非所有差异都具有统计学意义,置信度为 95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信