Disparities in therapies for coronary artery disease with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Abdullah H. Ghunaim, Dominique Vervoort, Lina A. Elfaki, Mimi X. Deng, Guillaume Marquis-Gravel, Stephen E. Fremes
{"title":"Disparities in therapies for coronary artery disease with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction","authors":"Abdullah H. Ghunaim, Dominique Vervoort, Lina A. Elfaki, Mimi X. Deng, Guillaume Marquis-Gravel, Stephen E. Fremes","doi":"10.20517/2574-1209.2023.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is used to manage left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) due to coronary artery disease (CAD). This review provides an overview of coronary revascularization for CAD with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), focusing on disparities in management. CABG provides more complete revascularization, and lower long-term all-cause mortality and reintervention and MI rates compared to PCI in patients with LVSD and CAD. Consequently, CABG is recommended as the primary revascularization therapy for CAD with reduced LVEF, with PCI being reserved for patients who are high-risk or have unfavorable coronary anatomy. Although LVSD increases revascularization risk, differential outcomes can be attributed to patients’ biological, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors as well as health system deficiencies. Women and racially and/or ethnically minoritized patients often present with progressive disease and greater comorbidity, experience delays in diagnosis and treatment, and have higher morbidity and mortality rates post-revascularization. These disparities may be explained by biological differences compounded by social determinants of health. Patients with CAD with LVSD pose unique medical challenges, which may be further complicated by disparities in care. Increased representation of minoritized patients in cardiovascular trials is needed to elucidate these differences and their long-term impact.","PeriodicalId":75299,"journal":{"name":"Vessel plus","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vessel plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is used to manage left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) due to coronary artery disease (CAD). This review provides an overview of coronary revascularization for CAD with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), focusing on disparities in management. CABG provides more complete revascularization, and lower long-term all-cause mortality and reintervention and MI rates compared to PCI in patients with LVSD and CAD. Consequently, CABG is recommended as the primary revascularization therapy for CAD with reduced LVEF, with PCI being reserved for patients who are high-risk or have unfavorable coronary anatomy. Although LVSD increases revascularization risk, differential outcomes can be attributed to patients’ biological, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors as well as health system deficiencies. Women and racially and/or ethnically minoritized patients often present with progressive disease and greater comorbidity, experience delays in diagnosis and treatment, and have higher morbidity and mortality rates post-revascularization. These disparities may be explained by biological differences compounded by social determinants of health. Patients with CAD with LVSD pose unique medical challenges, which may be further complicated by disparities in care. Increased representation of minoritized patients in cardiovascular trials is needed to elucidate these differences and their long-term impact.
左心室射血分数降低的冠状动脉疾病的治疗差异
通过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)进行血运重建可用于控制冠状动脉疾病(CAD)导致的左室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)。本综述概述了针对左室射血分数(LVEF)降低的 CAD 进行冠状动脉血运重建的情况,重点关注管理方面的差异。与 PCI 相比,CABG 能为 LVSD 和 CAD 患者提供更彻底的血管再通、更低的长期全因死亡率、再介入率和心肌梗死率。因此,建议将 CABG 作为 LVEF 降低的 CAD 的主要血管再通疗法,而 PCI 则保留给高风险或冠状动脉解剖结构不利的患者。虽然 LVSD 会增加血管再通的风险,但不同的结果可归因于患者的生理、行为和社会经济因素以及医疗系统的缺陷。女性、少数种族和/或族裔患者通常病情进展迅速,合并症较多,诊断和治疗延迟,血管再通后的发病率和死亡率较高。造成这些差异的原因可能是生理上的差异以及健康的社会决定因素。患有 CAD 并伴有 LVSD 的患者面临着独特的医疗挑战,而护理方面的差异可能会使这些挑战变得更加复杂。需要在心血管试验中增加少数民族患者的代表性,以阐明这些差异及其长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信