Reentry Service Engagement Among a Reentry Population with Co-occurring Mental Health and Opioid Use Disorders in Massachusetts Jails

Paige M. Shaffer, David Smelson, Abigail Helm, Ayorkor Gaba, Sarah Marcus, Howard J. Shaffer
{"title":"Reentry Service Engagement Among a Reentry Population with Co-occurring Mental Health and Opioid Use Disorders in Massachusetts Jails","authors":"Paige M. Shaffer, David Smelson, Abigail Helm, Ayorkor Gaba, Sarah Marcus, Howard J. Shaffer","doi":"10.12974/2313-1047.2023.10.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD) are common among people with criminal legal involvement. Reentry is a vulnerable period with low treatment engagement, often resulting in relapse, reincarceration, and overdose. While both linkage and multicomponent COD wraparound interventions have supported reentry, little is known about which are most effective for treatment engagement post release. Methods: This quasi-experimental study included 293 nonrandomized persons involved in the criminal legal system enrolled in a multicomponent COD intervention (n=173) or a linkage only model (n=120) for treatment. Kaplan Meier Curves and Cox Proportional Hazards were computed to determine differences in engagement. Results: Engagement was significantly different between interventions (X2=58.33, P <.0001). We observed a 73.3% reduction in hazard of early discharge for participants receiving the multicomponent COD intervention as compared to the linkage only model (P<.0001) and a higher 12-month engagement rate (51.5%) compared to the linkage only model (20.8%). Conclusions: Future research should include a randomized controlled trial to examine factors that influence post-release engagement as well as treatment effects and outcomes. We suggest that programs consider both interventions and assess client reentry needs in advance of release to match to the best suited post-release COD treatment.","PeriodicalId":222355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12974/2313-1047.2023.10.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD) are common among people with criminal legal involvement. Reentry is a vulnerable period with low treatment engagement, often resulting in relapse, reincarceration, and overdose. While both linkage and multicomponent COD wraparound interventions have supported reentry, little is known about which are most effective for treatment engagement post release. Methods: This quasi-experimental study included 293 nonrandomized persons involved in the criminal legal system enrolled in a multicomponent COD intervention (n=173) or a linkage only model (n=120) for treatment. Kaplan Meier Curves and Cox Proportional Hazards were computed to determine differences in engagement. Results: Engagement was significantly different between interventions (X2=58.33, P <.0001). We observed a 73.3% reduction in hazard of early discharge for participants receiving the multicomponent COD intervention as compared to the linkage only model (P<.0001) and a higher 12-month engagement rate (51.5%) compared to the linkage only model (20.8%). Conclusions: Future research should include a randomized controlled trial to examine factors that influence post-release engagement as well as treatment effects and outcomes. We suggest that programs consider both interventions and assess client reentry needs in advance of release to match to the best suited post-release COD treatment.
马萨诸塞州监狱中精神健康和阿片类药物使用并发症重返社会人群参与重返社会服务的情况
目的:在涉及刑事法律问题的人群中,阿片类药物使用和精神疾病(COD)并发的情况很常见。重返社会是一个脆弱的时期,治疗参与度低,往往会导致复发、再次入狱和用药过量。虽然联系干预和多成分 COD 综合干预都有助于重返社会,但人们对哪种干预对释放后的治疗参与度最有效知之甚少。 方法:这项准实验研究纳入了 293 名刑事法律系统中的非随机人员,他们参加了多成分 COD 干预(人数=173)或仅联系模式(人数=120)的治疗。研究人员计算了卡普兰-麦尔曲线和考克斯比例危害值,以确定参与程度的差异。 结果:不同干预措施之间的参与度存在明显差异(X2=58.33,P <.0001)。我们观察到,接受多组分 COD 干预的参与者的提前出院风险比单纯联系模型降低了 73.3%(P<.0001),12 个月的参与率(51.5%)也比单纯联系模型(20.8%)高。 结论:未来的研究应包括随机对照试验,以检查影响释放后参与的因素以及治疗效果和结果。我们建议,项目应考虑两种干预措施,并在释放前评估客户的重返社会需求,以匹配最适合的释放后 COD 治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信